BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-53052High confidence

io_uring/rw: fix missing NOWAIT check for O_DIRECT start write

Linux · Linux

4.4MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.119-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2024-53052 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: io_uring/rw: fix missing NOWAIT check for O_DIRECT start write
22 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-rt as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-kvm as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-internal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-partner as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's io_uring subsystem. A local user with administrative privileges can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by triggering a system deadlock. This issue occurs when direct input/output (I/O) write requests are processed during an active filesystem freeze without verifying non-blocking execution status. As a result, the freeze operation and pending write tasks wait on each other indefinitely, causing affected storage operations to hang.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
SSA-355557 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2
3 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
io_uring/rw: vulnerability due to io_uring not checking for IOCB_NOWAIT when starting an O_DIRECT write, leading to potential deadlocks if the mount point is being frozen.
Remediation
Update to V3.2 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-50468

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/rw: fix missing NOWAIT check for O_DIRECT start write When io_uring starts a write, it'll call kiocb_start_write() to bump the super block rwsem, preventing any freezes from happening while that write is in-flight. The freeze side will grab that rwsem for writing, excluding any new writers from happening and waiting for existing writes to finish. But io_uring unconditionally uses kiocb_start_write(), which will block if someone is currently attempting to freeze the mount point. This causes a deadlock where freeze is waiting for previous writes to complete, but the previous writes cannot complete, as the task that is supposed to complete them is blocked waiting on starting a new write. This results in the following stuck trace showing that dependency with the write blocked starting a new write: task:fio state:D stack:0 pid:886 tgid:886 ppid:876 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_rwsem_wait+0x1e8/0x3f8 __percpu_down_read+0xe8/0x500 io_write+0xbb8/0xff8 io_issue_sqe+0x10c/0x1020 io_submit_sqes+0x614/0x2110 __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x524/0x1038 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 INFO: task fsfreeze:7364 blocked for more than 15 seconds. Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-00063-g76aaf945701c #7963 with the attempting freezer stuck trying to grab the rwsem: task:fsfreeze state:D stack:0 pid:7364 tgid:7364 ppid:995 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_down_write+0x2b0/0x680 freeze_super+0x248/0x8a8 do_vfs_ioctl+0x149c/0x1b18 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x1a0 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 Fix this by having the io_uring side honor IOCB_NOWAIT, and only attempt a blocking grab of the super block rwsem if it isn't set. For normal issue where IOCB_NOWAIT would always be set, this returns -EAGAIN which will have io_uring core issue a blocking attempt of the write. That will in turn also get completions run, ensuring forward progress. Since freezing requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the first place, this isn't something that can be triggered by a regular user.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/rw: fix missing NOWAIT check for O_DIRECT start write When io_uring starts a write, it'll call kiocb_start_write() to bump the super block rwsem, preventing any freezes from happening while that write is in-flight. The freeze side will grab that rwsem for writing, excluding any new writers from happening and waiting for existing writes to finish. But io_uring unconditionally uses kiocb_start_write(), which will block if someone is currently attempting to freeze the mount point. This causes a deadlock where freeze is waiting for previous writes to complete, but the previous writes cannot complete, as the task that is supposed to complete them is blocked waiting on starting a new write. This results in the following stuck trace showing that dependency with the write blocked starting a new write: task:fio state:D stack:0 pid:886 tgid:886 ppid:876 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_rwsem_wait+0x1e8/0x3f8 __percpu_down_read+0xe8/0x500 io_write+0xbb8/0xff8 io_issue_sqe+0x10c/0x1020 io_submit_sqes+0x614/0x2110 __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x524/0x1038 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 INFO: task fsfreeze:7364 blocked for more than 15 seconds. Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-00063-g76aaf945701c #7963 with the attempting freezer stuck trying to grab the rwsem: task:fsfreeze state:D stack:0 pid:7364 tgid:7364 ppid:995 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_down_write+0x2b0/0x680 freeze_super+0x248/0x8a8 do_vfs_ioctl+0x149c/0x1b18 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x1a0 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 Fix this by having the io_uring side honor IOCB_NOWAIT, and only attempt a blocking grab of the super block rwsem if it isn't set. For normal issue where IOCB_NOWAIT would always be set, this returns -EAGAIN which will have io_uring core issue a blocking attempt of the write. That will in turn also get completions run, ensuring forward progress. Since freezing requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the first place, this isn't something that can be triggered by a regular user.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/rw: fix missing NOWAIT check for O_DIRECT start write When io_uring starts a write, it'll call kiocb_start_write() to bump the super block rwsem, preventing any freezes from happening while that write is in-flight. The freeze side will grab that rwsem for writing, excluding any new writers from happening and waiting for existing writes to finish. But io_uring unconditionally uses kiocb_start_write(), which will block if someone is currently attempting to freeze the mount point. This causes a deadlock where freeze is waiting for previous writes to complete, but the previous writes cannot complete, as the task that is supposed to complete them is blocked waiting on starting a new write. This results in the following stuck trace showing that dependency with the write blocked starting a new write: task:fio state:D stack:0 pid:886 tgid:886 ppid:876 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_rwsem_wait+0x1e8/0x3f8 __percpu_down_read+0xe8/0x500 io_write+0xbb8/0xff8 io_issue_sqe+0x10c/0x1020 io_submit_sqes+0x614/0x2110 __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x524/0x1038 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 INFO: task fsfreeze:7364 blocked for more than 15 seconds. Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-00063-g76aaf945701c #7963 with the attempting freezer stuck trying to grab the rwsem: task:fsfreeze state:D stack:0 pid:7364 tgid:7364 ppid:995 Call trace: __switch_to+0x1d8/0x348 __schedule+0x8e8/0x2248 schedule+0x110/0x3f0 percpu_down_write+0x2b0/0x680 freeze_super+0x248/0x8a8 do_vfs_ioctl+0x149c/0x1b18 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x1a0 invoke_syscall+0x74/0x268 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x238 do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60 el0_svc+0x44/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x128 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 Fix this by having the io_uring side honor IOCB_NOWAIT, and only attempt a blocking grab of the super block rwsem if it isn't set. For normal issue where IOCB_NOWAIT would always be set, this returns -EAGAIN which will have io_uring core issue a blocking attempt of the write. That will in turn also get completions run, ensuring forward progress. Since freezing requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the first place, this isn't something that can be triggered by a regular user.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
High: elevated access is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRHighPrivileges required: The attacker needs elevated or administrative privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2253IBM Security Verify Access: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Security Verify Access ausnutzen, um erweiterte Berechtigungen zu erlangen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren, sensible Informationen offenzulegen und andere, nicht näher bezeichnete Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3509Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241120Security Bulletin 20 Nov 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 20 Nov 2024, published on 20 November 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-50295 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52504 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50292 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-50292 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50287 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-50290 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1031Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-50290 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-013367Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Nov 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:49 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-50468
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-53052 · cve.blacktree.nl