BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-50253High confidence

bpf: Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-50253 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: bpf: Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new()
28 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • bpftool as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-rt as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. A privileged local user could exploit a missing validity check for the `nr_words` parameter within the Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) subsystem's `bpf_iter_bits_new()` function. This could lead to a multiplication overflow, resulting in stack corruption and a denial of service.
Remediation
To confirm that unprivileged users cannot utilize eBPF, inspect the `kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled` sysctl. A value of `1` indicates that unprivileged eBPF is disabled, which mitigates this flaw. If the value is `0`, set it to `1` using `sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1` and ensure this setting persists across reboots by adding `kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 1` to `/etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf`.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-44755

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new() Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new(). Without this check, when multiplication overflow occurs for nr_bits (e.g., when nr_words = 0x0400-0001, nr_bits becomes 64), stack corruption may occur due to bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(..., nr_bytes = 0x2000-0008). Fix it by limiting the maximum value of nr_words to 511. The value is derived from the current implementation of BPF memory allocator. To ensure compatibility if the BPF memory allocator's size limitation changes in the future, use the helper bpf_mem_alloc_check_size() to check whether nr_bytes is too larger. And return -E2BIG instead of -ENOMEM for oversized nr_bytes.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new() Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new(). Without this check, when multiplication overflow occurs for nr_bits (e.g., when nr_words = 0x0400-0001, nr_bits becomes 64), stack corruption may occur due to bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(..., nr_bytes = 0x2000-0008). Fix it by limiting the maximum value of nr_words to 511. The value is derived from the current implementation of BPF memory allocator. To ensure compatibility if the BPF memory allocator's size limitation changes in the future, use the helper bpf_mem_alloc_check_size() to check whether nr_bytes is too larger. And return -E2BIG instead of -ENOMEM for oversized nr_bytes.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new() Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new(). Without this check, when multiplication overflow occurs for nr_bits (e.g., when nr_words = 0x0400-0001, nr_bits becomes 64), stack corruption may occur due to bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(..., nr_bytes = 0x2000-0008). Fix it by limiting the maximum value of nr_words to 511. The value is derived from the current implementation of BPF memory allocator. To ensure compatibility if the BPF memory allocator's size limitation changes in the future, use the helper bpf_mem_alloc_check_size() to check whether nr_bytes is too larger. And return -E2BIG instead of -ENOMEM for oversized nr_bytes.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3397Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241113Security Bulletin 13 Nov 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 Nov 2024, published on 13 November 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50244 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50245 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50247 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50248 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50249 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50250 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50253 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50254 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50255 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50257 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50258 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50259 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50260 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50244 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50245 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50247 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50248 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50249 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50250 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50253 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50254 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50255 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50257 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50258 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50259 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50260 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-012761Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.11, 6.11.7 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
To confirm that unprivileged users cannot utilize eBPF, inspect the `kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled` sysctl. A value of `1` indicates that unprivileged eBPF is disabled, which mitigates this flaw. If the value is `0`, set it to `1` using `sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1` and ensure this setting persists across reboots by adding `kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 1` to `/etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf`.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Nov 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-44755
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-50253 · cve.blacktree.nl