BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-50164High confidence

bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 160 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 160 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.128-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2024-50164 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning
136 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • bpftool as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • kernel-rt as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) verifier. A privileged local attacker can exploit an issue where the BPF verifier incorrectly handles memory initialization flags. This allows a BPF program to write to read-only memory maps, such as `.rodata` global maps, bypassing security checks. This could lead to unauthorized modification of kernel data or information disclosure.
Remediation
To mitigate this issue, ensure that unprivileged eBPF is disabled by setting `kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled` to 1. This prevents unprivileged users from loading eBPF programs. To check the current status, run: ```bash cat /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled ``` If the output is 0, enable the mitigation by running: ```bash sudo sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1 ``` To make this change persistent across reboots, add or modify the following line in `/etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf` (or a similar sysctl configuration file): ``` kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 1 ``` Then, apply the changes: ```bash sudo sysctl --system ``` Note that these actions require root privileges.
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg() has the following code: if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) /* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw * mode so that the program is required to * initialize all the memory that the helper could * just partially fill up. */ meta = NULL; This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example, .rodata global maps. The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back in commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type") got overloaded over time with "the passed buffer is being written to". The problem however is that checks such as the above which were added later via 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") set meta to NULL in order force the user to always initialize the passed buffer to the helper. Due to the current double meaning of MEM_UNINIT, this bypasses verifier write checks to the memory (not boundary checks though) and only assumes the latter memory is read instead. Fix this by reverting MEM_UNINIT back to its original meaning, and having MEM_WRITE as an annotation to BPF helpers in order to then trigger the BPF verifier checks for writing to memory. Some notes: check_arg_pair_ok() ensures that for ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} we can access fn->arg_type[arg - 1] since it must contain a preceding ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. For check_mem_reg() the meta argument can be removed altogether since we do check both BPF_READ and BPF_WRITE. Same for the equivalent check_kfunc_mem_size_reg().
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-44666

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg() has the following code: if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) /* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw * mode so that the program is required to * initialize all the memory that the helper could * just partially fill up. */ meta = NULL; This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example, .rodata global maps. The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back in commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type") got overloaded over time with "the passed buffer is being written to". The problem however is that checks such as the above which were added later via 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") set meta to NULL in order force the user to always initialize the passed buffer to the helper. Due to the current double meaning of MEM_UNINIT, this bypasses verifier write checks to the memory (not boundary checks though) and only assumes the latter memory is read instead. Fix this by reverting MEM_UNINIT back to its original meaning, and having MEM_WRITE as an annotation to BPF helpers in order to then trigger the BPF verifier checks for writing to memory. Some notes: check_arg_pair_ok() ensures that for ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} we can access fn->arg_type[arg - 1] since it must contain a preceding ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. For check_mem_reg() the meta argument can be removed altogether since we do check both BPF_READ and BPF_WRITE. Same for the equivalent check_kfunc_mem_size_reg().

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 160 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg() has the following code: if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) /* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw * mode so that the program is required to * initialize all the memory that the helper could * just partially fill up. */ meta = NULL; This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example, .rodata global maps. The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back in commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type") got overloaded over time with "the passed buffer is being written to". The problem however is that checks such as the above which were added later via 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") set meta to NULL in order force the user to always initialize the passed buffer to the helper. Due to the current double meaning of MEM_UNINIT, this bypasses verifier write checks to the memory (not boundary checks though) and only assumes the latter memory is read instead. Fix this by reverting MEM_UNINIT back to its original meaning, and having MEM_WRITE as an annotation to BPF helpers in order to then trigger the BPF verifier checks for writing to memory. Some notes: check_arg_pair_ok() ensures that for ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} we can access fn->arg_type[arg - 1] since it must contain a preceding ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. For check_mem_reg() the meta argument can be removed altogether since we do check both BPF_READ and BPF_WRITE. Same for the equivalent check_kfunc_mem_size_reg().

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg() has the following code: if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) /* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw * mode so that the program is required to * initialize all the memory that the helper could * just partially fill up. */ meta = NULL; This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example, .rodata global maps. The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back in commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type") got overloaded over time with "the passed buffer is being written to". The problem however is that checks such as the above which were added later via 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") set meta to NULL in order force the user to always initialize the passed buffer to the helper. Due to the current double meaning of MEM_UNINIT, this bypasses verifier write checks to the memory (not boundary checks though) and only assumes the latter memory is read instead. Fix this by reverting MEM_UNINIT back to its original meaning, and having MEM_WRITE as an annotation to BPF helpers in order to then trigger the BPF verifier checks for writing to memory. Some notes: check_arg_pair_ok() ensures that for ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} we can access fn->arg_type[arg - 1] since it must contain a preceding ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. For check_mem_reg() the meta argument can be removed altogether since we do check both BPF_READ and BPF_WRITE. Same for the equivalent check_kfunc_mem_size_reg().

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg() has the following code: if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) /* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw * mode so that the program is required to * initialize all the memory that the helper could * just partially fill up. */ meta = NULL; This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example, .rodata global maps. The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back in commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type") got overloaded over time with "the passed buffer is being written to". The problem however is that checks such as the above which were added later via 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") set meta to NULL in order force the user to always initialize the passed buffer to the helper. Due to the current double meaning of MEM_UNINIT, this bypasses verifier write checks to the memory (not boundary checks though) and only assumes the latter memory is read instead. Fix this by reverting MEM_UNINIT back to its original meaning, and having MEM_WRITE as an annotation to BPF helpers in order to then trigger the BPF verifier checks for writing to memory. Some notes: check_arg_pair_ok() ensures that for ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} we can access fn->arg_type[arg - 1] since it must contain a preceding ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. For check_mem_reg() the meta argument can be removed altogether since we do check both BPF_READ and BPF_WRITE. Same for the equivalent check_kfunc_mem_size_reg().

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-44666Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg() has the following code: if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) /* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw * mode so that the program is required to * initialize all the memory that the helper could * just partially fill up. */ meta = NULL; This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example, .rodata global maps. The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back in commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type") got overloaded over time with "the passed buffer is being written to". The problem however is that checks such as the above which were added later via 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") set meta to NULL in order force the user to always initialize the passed buffer to the helper. Due to the current double meaning of MEM_UNINIT, this bypasses verifier write checks to the memory (not boundary checks though) and only assumes the latter memory is read instead. Fix this by reverting MEM_UNINIT back to its original meaning, and having MEM_WRITE as an annotation to BPF helpers in order to then trigger the BPF verifier checks for writing to memory. Some notes: check_arg_pair_ok() ensures that for ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} we can access fn->arg_type[arg - 1] since it must contain a preceding ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. For check_mem_reg() the meta argument can be removed altogether since we do check both BPF_READ and BPF_WRITE. Same for the equivalent check_kfunc_mem_size_reg().

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3367Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241113Security Bulletin 13 Nov 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 Nov 2024, published on 13 November 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

itique de sécurité Déni de service à distance Exécution de code arbitraire à distance Non spécifié par l'éditeur Élévation de privilèges Systèmes affectés Desigo CC toutes versions Desigo CC toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-15467 Desigo CC versions antérieures à 9.0.1 SIMATIC S7-1500 versions supérieures ou égales à 3.1.6 pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2021-41617, CVE-2023-28531, CVE-2023-51384, CVE-2023-52927, CVE-2024-26783, CVE-2024-27056, CVE-2024-28956, CVE-2024-36903, CVE-2024-36927, CVE-2024-42079, CVE-2024-46786, CVE-2024-47736, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-49968, CVE-2024-49994, CVE-2024-49998, CVE-2024-50014, CVE-2024-50063, CVE-2024-50164, CVE-2024-50298, CVE-2024-53124, CVE-2024-53170, CVE-2024-54458, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2024-56703, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2024-57973, CVE-2024-57977, CVE-2024-57979, CVE-2024-58011, CVE-2024-58016, CVE-2024-58020, CVE-2024-58056, CVE-2024-58058, CVE-2024-58061, CVE-2024-58086, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2025-21676, CVE-2025-21682, CVE-2025-21702, CVE-2025-21705, CVE-2025-21706, CVE-2025-21707, CVE-2025-21718, CVE-2025-21731, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21802, CVE-2025-21814, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-50057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50217 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-50057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50217 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-50147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50165 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50182 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50186 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50189 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-50127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50165 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50165 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0134Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

ne atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Debian DSA-5860-1 du 07 février 2025 https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2025/msg00023.html Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-013357Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.19, 6.1.125 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.59 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.11.6 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
To mitigate this issue, ensure that unprivileged eBPF is disabled by setting `kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled` to 1. This prevents unprivileged users from loading eBPF programs. To check the current status, run: ```bash cat /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled ``` If the output is 0, enable the mitigation by running: ```bash sudo sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1 ``` To make this change persistent across reboots, add or modify the following line in `/etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf` (or a similar sysctl configuration file): ``` kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 1 ``` Then, apply the changes: ```bash sudo sysctl --system ``` Note that these actions require root privileges.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 7 Nov 2024 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:39 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-44666
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db < 43f4df339a4d375bedcad29a61ae6f0ee7a048f8; 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db < 48068ccaea957469f1adf78dfd2c1c9a7e18f0fe; 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db < 54bc31682660810af1bed7ca7a19f182df8d3df8; 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db < 8ea607330a39184f51737c6ae706db7fdca7628e; 6099a6c8a749a5c8d5f8b4c4342022a92072a02b; bfe25df63048edd4ceaf78a2fc755d5e2befc978; 717c39718dbc4f7ebcbb7b625fb11851cd9007fe; 5d0bba8232bf22ce13747cbfc8f696318ff01a50 · Fixed: < 5.19; 6.1.125 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.59 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.11.6 ≤ 6.11.*; 6.12 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db < 43f4df339a4d375bedcad29a61ae6f0ee7a048f8, 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db < 48068ccaea957469f1adf78dfd2c1c9a7e18f0fe, 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db < 54bc31682660810af1bed7ca7a19f182df8d3df8, 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db < 8ea607330a39184f51737c6ae706db7fdca7628e, 6099a6c8a749a5c8d5f8b4c4342022a92072a02b, bfe25df63048edd4ceaf78a2fc755d5e2befc978, 717c39718dbc4f7ebcbb7b625fb11851cd9007fe, 5d0bba8232bf22ce13747cbfc8f696318ff01a50, 70674d11d14eeecad90be4b409a22b902112ba32, a08d942ecbf46e23a192093f6983cb1d779f4fa8, 5.15.45 < 5.16, 5.17.13 < 5.18, 5.18.2 < 5.19, 5.19 · Fixed: Linux: < 5.19, 6.1.125 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.59 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.11.6 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-50164 · cve.blacktree.nl