BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-50154High confidence

tcp/dccp: Don't use timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink().

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.56% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.115-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-50154 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 98 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-50154
197 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp/dccp: Don't use timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink(). Martin KaFai Lau reported use-after-free [0] in reqsk_timer_handler(). """ We are seeing a use-after-free from a bpf prog attached to trace_tcp_retransmit_synack. The program passes the req->sk to the bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing kernel helper which does check for null before using it. """ The commit 83fccfc3940c ("inet: fix potential deadlock in reqsk_queue_unlink()") added timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink() not to call del_timer_sync() from reqsk_timer_handler(), but it introduced a small race window. Before the timer is called, expire_timers() calls detach_timer(timer, true) to clear timer->entry.pprev and marks it as not pending. If reqsk_queue_unlink() checks timer_pending() just after expire_timers() calls detach_timer(), TCP will miss del_timer_sync(); the reqsk timer will continue running and send multiple SYN+ACKs until it expires. The reported UAF could happen if req->sk is close()d earlier than the timer expiration, which is 63s by default. The scenario would be 1. inet_csk_complete_hashdance() calls inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(), but del_timer_sync() is missed 2. reqsk timer is executed and scheduled again 3. req->sk is accept()ed and reqsk_put() decrements rsk_refcnt, but reqsk timer still has another one, and inet_csk_accept() does not clear req->sk for non-TFO sockets 4. sk is close()d 5. reqsk timer is executed again, and BPF touches req->sk Let's not use timer_pending() by passing the caller context to __inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(). Note that reqsk timer is pinned, so the issue does not happen in most use cases. [1] [0] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x2e/0x1b0 Use-after-free read at 0x00000000a891fb3a (in kfence-#1): bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x2e/0x1b0 bpf_prog_5ea3e95db6da0438_tcp_retransmit_synack+0x1d20/0x1dda bpf_trace_run2+0x4c/0xc0 tcp_rtx_synack+0xf9/0x100 reqsk_timer_handler+0xda/0x3d0 run_timer_softirq+0x292/0x8a0 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 intel_idle_irq+0x5a/0xa0 cpuidle_enter_state+0x94/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb kfence-#1: 0x00000000a72cc7b6-0x00000000d97616d9, size=2376, cache=TCPv6 allocated by task 0 on cpu 9 at 260507.901592s: sk_prot_alloc+0x35/0x140 sk_clone_lock+0x1f/0x3f0 inet_csk_clone_lock+0x15/0x160 tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1f/0x410 tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock+0x1da/0x700 tcp_check_req+0x1fb/0x510 tcp_v6_rcv+0x98b/0x1420 ipv6_list_rcv+0x2258/0x26e0 napi_complete_done+0x5b1/0x2990 mlx5e_napi_poll+0x2ae/0x8d0 net_rx_action+0x13e/0x590 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 common_interrupt+0x80/0x90 asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb freed by task 0 on cpu 9 at 260507.927527s: rcu_core_si+0x4ff/0xf10 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-45151

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp/dccp: Don't use timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink(). Martin KaFai Lau reported use-after-free [0] in reqsk_timer_handler(). """ We are seeing a use-after-free from a bpf prog attached to trace_tcp_retransmit_synack. The program passes the req->sk to the bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing kernel helper which does check for null before using it. """ The commit 83fccfc3940c ("inet: fix potential deadlock in reqsk_queue_unlink()") added timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink() not to call del_timer_sync() from reqsk_timer_handler(), but it introduced a small race window. Before the timer is called, expire_timers() calls detach_timer(timer, true) to clear timer->entry.pprev and marks it as not pending. If reqsk_queue_unlink() checks timer_pending() just after expire_timers() calls detach_timer(), TCP will miss del_timer_sync(); the reqsk timer will continue running and send multiple SYN+ACKs until it expires. The reported UAF could happen if req->sk is close()d earlier than the timer expiration, which is 63s by default. The scenario would be 1. inet_csk_complete_hashdance() calls inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(), but del_timer_sync() is missed 2. reqsk timer is executed and scheduled again 3. req->sk is accept()ed and reqsk_put() decrements rsk_refcnt, but reqsk timer still has another one, and inet_csk_accept() does not clear req->sk for non-TFO sockets 4. sk is close()d 5. reqsk timer is executed again, and BPF touches req->sk Let's not use timer_pending() by passing the caller context to __inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(). Note that reqsk timer is pinned, so the issue does not happen in most use cases. [1] [0] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x2e/0x1b0 Use-after-free read at 0x00000000a891fb3a (in kfence-#1): bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x2e/0x1b0 bpf_prog_5ea3e95db6da0438_tcp_retransmit_synack+0x1d20/0x1dda bpf_trace_run2+0x4c/0xc0 tcp_rtx_synack+0xf9/0x100 reqsk_timer_handler+0xda/0x3d0 run_timer_softirq+0x292/0x8a0 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 intel_idle_irq+0x5a/0xa0 cpuidle_enter_state+0x94/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb kfence-#1: 0x00000000a72cc7b6-0x00000000d97616d9, size=2376, cache=TCPv6 allocated by task 0 on cpu 9 at 260507.901592s: sk_prot_alloc+0x35/0x140 sk_clone_lock+0x1f/0x3f0 inet_csk_clone_lock+0x15/0x160 tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1f/0x410 tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock+0x1da/0x700 tcp_check_req+0x1fb/0x510 tcp_v6_rcv+0x98b/0x1420 ipv6_list_rcv+0x2258/0x26e0 napi_complete_done+0x5b1/0x2990 mlx5e_napi_poll+0x2ae/0x8d0 net_rx_action+0x13e/0x590 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 common_interrupt+0x80/0x90 asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb freed by task 0 on cpu 9 at 260507.927527s: rcu_core_si+0x4ff/0xf10 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp/dccp: Don't use timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink(). Martin KaFai Lau reported use-after-free [0] in reqsk_timer_handler(). """ We are seeing a use-after-free from a bpf prog attached to trace_tcp_retransmit_synack. The program passes the req->sk to the bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing kernel helper which does check for null before using it. """ The commit 83fccfc3940c ("inet: fix potential deadlock in reqsk_queue_unlink()") added timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink() not to call del_timer_sync() from reqsk_timer_handler(), but it introduced a small race window. Before the timer is called, expire_timers() calls detach_timer(timer, true) to clear timer->entry.pprev and marks it as not pending. If reqsk_queue_unlink() checks timer_pending() just after expire_timers() calls detach_timer(), TCP will miss del_timer_sync(); the reqsk timer will continue running and send multiple SYN+ACKs until it expires. The reported UAF could happen if req->sk is close()d earlier than the timer expiration, which is 63s by default. The scenario would be 1. inet_csk_complete_hashdance() calls inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(), but del_timer_sync() is missed 2. reqsk timer is executed and scheduled again 3. req->sk is accept()ed and reqsk_put() decrements rsk_refcnt, but reqsk timer still has another one, and inet_csk_accept() does not clear req->sk for non-TFO sockets 4. sk is close()d 5. reqsk timer is executed again, and BPF touches req->sk Let's not use timer_pending() by passing the caller context to __inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(). Note that reqsk timer is pinned, so the issue does not happen in most use cases. [1] [0] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x2e/0x1b0 Use-after-free read at 0x00000000a891fb3a (in kfence-#1): bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x2e/0x1b0 bpf_prog_5ea3e95db6da0438_tcp_retransmit_synack+0x1d20/0x1dda bpf_trace_run2+0x4c/0xc0 tcp_rtx_synack+0xf9/0x100 reqsk_timer_handler+0xda/0x3d0 run_timer_softirq+0x292/0x8a0 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 intel_idle_irq+0x5a/0xa0 cpuidle_enter_state+0x94/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb kfence-#1: 0x00000000a72cc7b6-0x00000000d97616d9, size=2376, cache=TCPv6 allocated by task 0 on cpu 9 at 260507.901592s: sk_prot_alloc+0x35/0x140 sk_clone_lock+0x1f/0x3f0 inet_csk_clone_lock+0x15/0x160 tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1f/0x410 tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock+0x1da/0x700 tcp_check_req+0x1fb/0x510 tcp_v6_rcv+0x98b/0x1420 ipv6_list_rcv+0x2258/0x26e0 napi_complete_done+0x5b1/0x2990 mlx5e_napi_poll+0x2ae/0x8d0 net_rx_action+0x13e/0x590 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 common_interrupt+0x80/0x90 asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb freed by task 0 on cpu 9 at 260507.927527s: rcu_core_si+0x4ff/0xf10 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp/dccp: Don't use timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink(). Martin KaFai Lau reported use-after-free [0] in reqsk_timer_handler(). """ We are seeing a use-after-free from a bpf prog attached to trace_tcp_retransmit_synack. The program passes the req->sk to the bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing kernel helper which does check for null before using it. """ The commit 83fccfc3940c ("inet: fix potential deadlock in reqsk_queue_unlink()") added timer_pending() in reqsk_queue_unlink() not to call del_timer_sync() from reqsk_timer_handler(), but it introduced a small race window. Before the timer is called, expire_timers() calls detach_timer(timer, true) to clear timer->entry.pprev and marks it as not pending. If reqsk_queue_unlink() checks timer_pending() just after expire_timers() calls detach_timer(), TCP will miss del_timer_sync(); the reqsk timer will continue running and send multiple SYN+ACKs until it expires. The reported UAF could happen if req->sk is close()d earlier than the timer expiration, which is 63s by default. The scenario would be 1. inet_csk_complete_hashdance() calls inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(), but del_timer_sync() is missed 2. reqsk timer is executed and scheduled again 3. req->sk is accept()ed and reqsk_put() decrements rsk_refcnt, but reqsk timer still has another one, and inet_csk_accept() does not clear req->sk for non-TFO sockets 4. sk is close()d 5. reqsk timer is executed again, and BPF touches req->sk Let's not use timer_pending() by passing the caller context to __inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(). Note that reqsk timer is pinned, so the issue does not happen in most use cases. [1] [0] BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x2e/0x1b0 Use-after-free read at 0x00000000a891fb3a (in kfence-#1): bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x2e/0x1b0 bpf_prog_5ea3e95db6da0438_tcp_retransmit_synack+0x1d20/0x1dda bpf_trace_run2+0x4c/0xc0 tcp_rtx_synack+0xf9/0x100 reqsk_timer_handler+0xda/0x3d0 run_timer_softirq+0x292/0x8a0 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 intel_idle_irq+0x5a/0xa0 cpuidle_enter_state+0x94/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb kfence-#1: 0x00000000a72cc7b6-0x00000000d97616d9, size=2376, cache=TCPv6 allocated by task 0 on cpu 9 at 260507.901592s: sk_prot_alloc+0x35/0x140 sk_clone_lock+0x1f/0x3f0 inet_csk_clone_lock+0x15/0x160 tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1f/0x410 tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock+0x1da/0x700 tcp_check_req+0x1fb/0x510 tcp_v6_rcv+0x98b/0x1420 ipv6_list_rcv+0x2258/0x26e0 napi_complete_done+0x5b1/0x2990 mlx5e_napi_poll+0x2ae/0x8d0 net_rx_action+0x13e/0x590 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 common_interrupt+0x80/0x90 asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb freed by task 0 on cpu 9 at 260507.927527s: rcu_core_si+0x4ff/0xf10 irq_exit_rcu+0xf5/0x320 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x273 cpu_startup_entry+0x15e/0x260 start_secondary+0x8a/0x90 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xfa/0xfb

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1905IBM QRadar SIEM Komponente: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM Komponenten ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, und um Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3368Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241113Security Bulletin 13 Nov 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 Nov 2024, published on 13 November 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47674 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-53528 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53530 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53531 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53532 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58239 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0860Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0746Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-13009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23337 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43420 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45332 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47535 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50349 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52533 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0626Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-46823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47730 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47753 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47754 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56608 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50067 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50210 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50149 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50149 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0071Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0070Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0024Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50117 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-50141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50139 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-012562Linux の Linux Kernel における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.2, 5.4.293 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.237 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.170 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.115 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.59 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.11.6 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 7 Nov 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-45151
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-50154 · cve.blacktree.nl