BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-50082High confidence

blk-rq-qos: fix crash on rq_qos_wait vs. rq_qos_wake_function race

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-355557 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.115-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-355557 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2
3 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
blk-rq-qos: vulnerability in blk-rq-qos can cause a crash due to a race condition between rq_qos_wait and rq_qos_wake_function, which is fixed by ensuring the waitqueue entry is accessed in the correct order.
Remediation
Update to V3.2 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-44719

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-rq-qos: fix crash on rq_qos_wait vs. rq_qos_wake_function race We're seeing crashes from rq_qos_wake_function that look like this: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffafe180a40084 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 10027c067 PMD 10115d067 PTE 0 Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 17 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/17 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-00013-geca631b8fe80 #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1d/0x40 Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 9c 41 5c fa 65 ff 05 62 97 30 4c 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 <f0> 0f b1 17 75 0a 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc 89 c6 e8 2c 0b 00 RSP: 0018:ffffafe180580ca0 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffafe180a3f7a8 RCX: 0000000000000011 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffffafe180a40084 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000001e7240 R09: 0000000000000011 R10: 0000000000000028 R11: 0000000000000888 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: ffffafe180a40084 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9aaf1f280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffafe180a40084 CR3: 000000010e428002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> try_to_wake_up+0x5a/0x6a0 rq_qos_wake_function+0x71/0x80 __wake_up_common+0x75/0xa0 __wake_up+0x36/0x60 scale_up.part.0+0x50/0x110 wb_timer_fn+0x227/0x450 ... So rq_qos_wake_function() calls wake_up_process(data->task), which calls try_to_wake_up(), which faults in raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock). p comes from data->task, and data comes from the waitqueue entry, which is stored on the waiter's stack in rq_qos_wait(). Analyzing the core dump with drgn, I found that the waiter had already woken up and moved on to a completely unrelated code path, clobbering what was previously data->task. Meanwhile, the waker was passing the clobbered garbage in data->task to wake_up_process(), leading to the crash. What's happening is that in between rq_qos_wake_function() deleting the waitqueue entry and calling wake_up_process(), rq_qos_wait() is finding that it already got a token and returning. The race looks like this: rq_qos_wait() rq_qos_wake_function() ============================================================== prepare_to_wait_exclusive() data->got_token = true; list_del_init(&curr->entry); if (data.got_token) break; finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq); ^- returns immediately because list_empty_careful(&wq_entry->entry) is true ... return, go do something else ... wake_up_process(data->task) (NO LONGER VALID!)-^ Normally, finish_wait() is supposed to synchronize against the waker. But, as noted above, it is returning immediately because the waitqueue entry has already been removed from the waitqueue. The bug is that rq_qos_wake_function() is accessing the waitqueue entry AFTER deleting it. Note that autoremove_wake_function() wakes the waiter and THEN deletes the waitqueue entry, which is the proper order. Fix it by swapping the order. We also need to use list_del_init_careful() to match the list_empty_careful() in finish_wait().

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-rq-qos: fix crash on rq_qos_wait vs. rq_qos_wake_function race We're seeing crashes from rq_qos_wake_function that look like this: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffafe180a40084 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 10027c067 PMD 10115d067 PTE 0 Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 17 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/17 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-00013-geca631b8fe80 #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1d/0x40 Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 9c 41 5c fa 65 ff 05 62 97 30 4c 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 <f0> 0f b1 17 75 0a 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc 89 c6 e8 2c 0b 00 RSP: 0018:ffffafe180580ca0 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffafe180a3f7a8 RCX: 0000000000000011 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffffafe180a40084 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000001e7240 R09: 0000000000000011 R10: 0000000000000028 R11: 0000000000000888 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: ffffafe180a40084 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9aaf1f280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffafe180a40084 CR3: 000000010e428002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> try_to_wake_up+0x5a/0x6a0 rq_qos_wake_function+0x71/0x80 __wake_up_common+0x75/0xa0 __wake_up+0x36/0x60 scale_up.part.0+0x50/0x110 wb_timer_fn+0x227/0x450 ... So rq_qos_wake_function() calls wake_up_process(data->task), which calls try_to_wake_up(), which faults in raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock). p comes from data->task, and data comes from the waitqueue entry, which is stored on the waiter's stack in rq_qos_wait(). Analyzing the core dump with drgn, I found that the waiter had already woken up and moved on to a completely unrelated code path, clobbering what was previously data->task. Meanwhile, the waker was passing the clobbered garbage in data->task to wake_up_process(), leading to the crash. What's happening is that in between rq_qos_wake_function() deleting the waitqueue entry and calling wake_up_process(), rq_qos_wait() is finding that it already got a token and returning. The race looks like this: rq_qos_wait() rq_qos_wake_function() ============================================================== prepare_to_wait_exclusive() data->got_token = true; list_del_init(&curr->entry); if (data.got_token) break; finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq); ^- returns immediately because list_empty_careful(&wq_entry->entry) is true ... return, go do something else ... wake_up_process(data->task) (NO LONGER VALID!)-^ Normally, finish_wait() is supposed to synchronize against the waker. But, as noted above, it is returning immediately because the waitqueue entry has already been removed from the waitqueue. The bug is that rq_qos_wake_function() is accessing the waitqueue entry AFTER deleting it. Note that autoremove_wake_function() wakes the waiter and THEN deletes the waitqueue entry, which is the proper order. Fix it by swapping the order. We also need to use list_del_init_careful() to match the list_empty_careful() in finish_wait().

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-rq-qos: fix crash on rq_qos_wait vs. rq_qos_wake_function race We're seeing crashes from rq_qos_wake_function that look like this: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffafe180a40084 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 10027c067 PMD 10115d067 PTE 0 Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 17 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/17 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-00013-geca631b8fe80 #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1d/0x40 Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 9c 41 5c fa 65 ff 05 62 97 30 4c 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 <f0> 0f b1 17 75 0a 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc 89 c6 e8 2c 0b 00 RSP: 0018:ffffafe180580ca0 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffafe180a3f7a8 RCX: 0000000000000011 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffffafe180a40084 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000001e7240 R09: 0000000000000011 R10: 0000000000000028 R11: 0000000000000888 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: ffffafe180a40084 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9aaf1f280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffafe180a40084 CR3: 000000010e428002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> try_to_wake_up+0x5a/0x6a0 rq_qos_wake_function+0x71/0x80 __wake_up_common+0x75/0xa0 __wake_up+0x36/0x60 scale_up.part.0+0x50/0x110 wb_timer_fn+0x227/0x450 ... So rq_qos_wake_function() calls wake_up_process(data->task), which calls try_to_wake_up(), which faults in raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock). p comes from data->task, and data comes from the waitqueue entry, which is stored on the waiter's stack in rq_qos_wait(). Analyzing the core dump with drgn, I found that the waiter had already woken up and moved on to a completely unrelated code path, clobbering what was previously data->task. Meanwhile, the waker was passing the clobbered garbage in data->task to wake_up_process(), leading to the crash. What's happening is that in between rq_qos_wake_function() deleting the waitqueue entry and calling wake_up_process(), rq_qos_wait() is finding that it already got a token and returning. The race looks like this: rq_qos_wait() rq_qos_wake_function() ============================================================== prepare_to_wait_exclusive() data->got_token = true; list_del_init(&curr->entry); if (data.got_token) break; finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq); ^- returns immediately because list_empty_careful(&wq_entry->entry) is true ... return, go do something else ... wake_up_process(data->task) (NO LONGER VALID!)-^ Normally, finish_wait() is supposed to synchronize against the waker. But, as noted above, it is returning immediately because the waitqueue entry has already been removed from the waitqueue. The bug is that rq_qos_wake_function() is accessing the waitqueue entry AFTER deleting it. Note that autoremove_wake_function() wakes the waiter and THEN deletes the waitqueue entry, which is the proper order. Fix it by swapping the order. We also need to use list_del_init_careful() to match the list_empty_careful() in finish_wait().

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2855IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder andere, nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3289Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241030Security Bulletin 30 Oct 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Oct 2024, published on 30 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-46695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47118 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47535 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47561 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49350 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50192 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0664Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

6 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621735-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21743-1 du 19 mai 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621743-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:21745-1 du 19 mai 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621745-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:2068-1 du 26 mai 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262068-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50053 Référence CVE CVE-2023-20585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20585 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23193 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-50039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0648Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50022 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42226 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50080 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50084 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50080 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50084 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50080 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50084 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0255Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2023-36478 Référence CVE CVE-2023-36479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36479 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40167 Référence CVE CVE-2023-41900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-41900 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-3661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50192 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-50046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50103 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50116 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50080 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50081 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50084 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50036 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50101 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50103 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50080 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50081 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50084 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-50060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50067 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50069 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50069 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50080 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50081 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50084 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1078Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-41064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50192 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-011664Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.19, 5.4.285 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.228 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.169 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.114 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.58 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.11.5 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Oct 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-44719
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-50082 · cve.blacktree.nl