BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-50014High confidence

ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

21 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 17 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2024-50014 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path
64 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. When the ext4 filesystem's fast-commit feature is enabled, a local attacker could trigger a condition where an uninitialized lock is accessed during the filesystem's replay path. This can lead to a system crash, resulting in a denial of service.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path The following kernel trace can be triggered with fstest generic/629 when executed against a filesystem with fast-commit feature enabled: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90 register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0 __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630 ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x61/0xb0 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x79/0x270 ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450 ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450 ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540 ? jread+0x88/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40 do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00 jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0 jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390 ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40 ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180 ... In the replay path there's an attempt to lock sbi->s_bdev_wb_lock in function ext4_check_bdev_write_error(). Unfortunately, at this point this spinlock has not been initialized yet. Moving it's initialization to an earlier point in __ext4_fill_super() fixes this splat.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-45232

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path The following kernel trace can be triggered with fstest generic/629 when executed against a filesystem with fast-commit feature enabled: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90 register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0 __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630 ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x61/0xb0 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x79/0x270 ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450 ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450 ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540 ? jread+0x88/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40 do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00 jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0 jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390 ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40 ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180 ... In the replay path there's an attempt to lock sbi->s_bdev_wb_lock in function ext4_check_bdev_write_error(). Unfortunately, at this point this spinlock has not been initialized yet. Moving it's initialization to an earlier point in __ext4_fill_super() fixes this splat.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path The following kernel trace can be triggered with fstest generic/629 when executed against a filesystem with fast-commit feature enabled: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90 register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0 __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630 ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x61/0xb0 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x79/0x270 ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450 ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450 ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540 ? jread+0x88/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40 do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00 jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0 jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390 ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40 ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180 ... In the replay path there's an attempt to lock sbi->s_bdev_wb_lock in function ext4_check_bdev_write_error(). Unfortunately, at this point this spinlock has not been initialized yet. Moving it's initialization to an earlier point in __ext4_fill_super() fixes this splat.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path The following kernel trace can be triggered with fstest generic/629 when executed against a filesystem with fast-commit feature enabled: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90 register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0 __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630 ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x61/0xb0 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x79/0x270 ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450 ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450 ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540 ? jread+0x88/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40 do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00 jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0 jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390 ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40 ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180 ... In the replay path there's an attempt to lock sbi->s_bdev_wb_lock in function ext4_check_bdev_write_error(). Unfortunately, at this point this spinlock has not been initialized yet. Moving it's initialization to an earlier point in __ext4_fill_super() fixes this splat.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path The following kernel trace can be triggered with fstest generic/629 when executed against a filesystem with fast-commit feature enabled: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90 register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0 __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630 ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x61/0xb0 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x79/0x270 ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450 ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450 ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540 ? jread+0x88/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40 do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00 jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0 jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390 ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40 ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180 ... In the replay path there's an attempt to lock sbi->s_bdev_wb_lock in function ext4_check_bdev_write_error(). Unfortunately, at this point this spinlock has not been initialized yet. Moving it's initialization to an earlier point in __ext4_fill_super() fixes this splat.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use of Uninitialized Resource → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-908 ↗

CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource. The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-908
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-45232Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix access to uninitialised lock in fc replay path The following kernel trace can be triggered with fstest generic/629 when executed against a filesystem with fast-commit feature enabled: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 866 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0x90 register_lock_class+0x759/0x7d0 __lock_acquire+0x85/0x2630 ? __find_get_block+0xb4/0x380 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0xd5/0x160 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x61/0xb0 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x79/0x270 ? ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x2f8/0x450 ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks+0x330/0x450 ext4_fc_replay+0x14c8/0x1540 ? jread+0x88/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x40 do_one_pass+0x447/0xd00 jbd2_journal_recover+0x139/0x1b0 jbd2_journal_load+0x96/0x390 ext4_load_and_init_journal+0x253/0xd40 ext4_fill_super+0x2cc6/0x3180 ... In the replay path there's an attempt to lock sbi->s_bdev_wb_lock in function ext4_check_bdev_write_error(). Unfortunately, at this point this spinlock has not been initialized yet. Moving it's initialization to an earlier point in __ext4_fill_super() fixes this splat.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2855IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder andere, nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3251Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht näher bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen..

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241023Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024, published on 23 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

données Contournement de la politique de sécurité Déni de service à distance Exécution de code arbitraire à distance Non spécifié par l'éditeur Élévation de privilèges Systèmes affectés Desigo CC toutes versions Desigo CC toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-15467 Desigo CC versions antérieures à 9.0.1 SIMATIC S7-1500 versions supérieures ou égales à 3.1.6 pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2021-41617, CVE-2023-28531, CVE-2023-51384, CVE-2023-52927, CVE-2024-26783, CVE-2024-27056, CVE-2024-28956, CVE-2024-36903, CVE-2024-36927, CVE-2024-42079, CVE-2024-46786, CVE-2024-47736, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-49968, CVE-2024-49994, CVE-2024-49998, CVE-2024-50014, CVE-2024-50063, CVE-2024-50164, CVE-2024-50298, CVE-2024-53124, CVE-2024-53170, CVE-2024-54458, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2024-56703, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2024-57973, CVE-2024-57977, CVE-2024-57979, CVE-2024-58011, CVE-2024-58016, CVE-2024-58020, CVE-2024-58056, CVE-2024-58058, CVE-2024-58061, CVE-2024-58086, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2025-21676, CVE-2025-21682, CVE-2025-21702, CVE-2025-21705, CVE-2025-21706, CVE-2025-21707, CVE-2025-21718, CVE-2025-21731, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-49994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50036 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50036 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0134Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Debian DSA-5860-1 du 07 février 2025 https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2025/msg00023.html Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50023 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0999Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50023 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-011407Linux の Linux Kernel における初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Oct 2024 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:39 UTC · CWE-908 · Use of Uninitialized Resource

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-45232
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    01efe93a5aa20a19b390426718dc214898a7c2ec < 6e35f560daebe40264c95e9a1ab03110d4997df6; 01efe93a5aa20a19b390426718dc214898a7c2ec < d157fc20ca5239fd56965a5a8aa1a0e25919891a; 01efe93a5aa20a19b390426718dc214898a7c2ec < b002031d585a14eed511117dda8c6452a804d508; 01efe93a5aa20a19b390426718dc214898a7c2ec < 23dfdb56581ad92a9967bcd720c8c23356af74c1; 6.6 · Fixed: < 6.6; 6.6.75 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.10.14 ≤ 6.10.*; 6.11.3 ≤ 6.11.*; 6.12 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 01efe93a5aa20a19b390426718dc214898a7c2ec < 6e35f560daebe40264c95e9a1ab03110d4997df6, 01efe93a5aa20a19b390426718dc214898a7c2ec < d157fc20ca5239fd56965a5a8aa1a0e25919891a, 01efe93a5aa20a19b390426718dc214898a7c2ec < b002031d585a14eed511117dda8c6452a804d508, 01efe93a5aa20a19b390426718dc214898a7c2ec < 23dfdb56581ad92a9967bcd720c8c23356af74c1, 6.6 · Fixed: Linux: < 6.6, 6.6.75 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.10.14 ≤ 6.10.*, 6.11.3 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-50014 · cve.blacktree.nl