BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-49961High confidence

media: i2c: ar0521: Use cansleep version of gpiod_set_value()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

21 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 17 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.115-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-43640

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: i2c: ar0521: Use cansleep version of gpiod_set_value() If we use GPIO reset from I2C port expander, we must use *_cansleep() variant of GPIO functions. This was not done in ar0521_power_on()/ar0521_power_off() functions. Let's fix that. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11 at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3496 gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted 6.10.0 #53 Hardware name: Diasom DS-RK3568-SOM-EVB (DT) Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func pstate: 80400009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c lr : ar0521_power_on+0xcc/0x290 sp : ffffff8001d7ab70 x29: ffffff8001d7ab70 x28: ffffff80027dcc90 x27: ffffff8003c82000 x26: ffffff8003ca9250 x25: ffffffc080a39c60 x24: ffffff8003ca9088 x23: ffffff8002402720 x22: ffffff8003ca9080 x21: ffffff8003ca9088 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffff8001eb2a00 x18: ffffff80efeeac80 x17: 756d2d6332692f30 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: ffffff8001d91d40 x13: 0000000000000016 x12: ffffffc080e98930 x11: ffffff8001eb2880 x10: 0000000000000890 x9 : ffffff8001d7a9f0 x8 : ffffff8001d92570 x7 : ffffff80efeeac80 x6 : 000000003fc6e780 x5 : ffffff8001d91c80 x4 : 0000000000000002 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c ar0521_power_on+0xcc/0x290 ...

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: i2c: ar0521: Use cansleep version of gpiod_set_value() If we use GPIO reset from I2C port expander, we must use *_cansleep() variant of GPIO functions. This was not done in ar0521_power_on()/ar0521_power_off() functions. Let's fix that. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11 at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3496 gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted 6.10.0 #53 Hardware name: Diasom DS-RK3568-SOM-EVB (DT) Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func pstate: 80400009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c lr : ar0521_power_on+0xcc/0x290 sp : ffffff8001d7ab70 x29: ffffff8001d7ab70 x28: ffffff80027dcc90 x27: ffffff8003c82000 x26: ffffff8003ca9250 x25: ffffffc080a39c60 x24: ffffff8003ca9088 x23: ffffff8002402720 x22: ffffff8003ca9080 x21: ffffff8003ca9088 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffff8001eb2a00 x18: ffffff80efeeac80 x17: 756d2d6332692f30 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: ffffff8001d91d40 x13: 0000000000000016 x12: ffffffc080e98930 x11: ffffff8001eb2880 x10: 0000000000000890 x9 : ffffff8001d7a9f0 x8 : ffffff8001d92570 x7 : ffffff80efeeac80 x6 : 000000003fc6e780 x5 : ffffff8001d91c80 x4 : 0000000000000002 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c ar0521_power_on+0xcc/0x290 ...

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: i2c: ar0521: Use cansleep version of gpiod_set_value() If we use GPIO reset from I2C port expander, we must use *_cansleep() variant of GPIO functions. This was not done in ar0521_power_on()/ar0521_power_off() functions. Let's fix that. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11 at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3496 gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted 6.10.0 #53 Hardware name: Diasom DS-RK3568-SOM-EVB (DT) Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func pstate: 80400009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c lr : ar0521_power_on+0xcc/0x290 sp : ffffff8001d7ab70 x29: ffffff8001d7ab70 x28: ffffff80027dcc90 x27: ffffff8003c82000 x26: ffffff8003ca9250 x25: ffffffc080a39c60 x24: ffffff8003ca9088 x23: ffffff8002402720 x22: ffffff8003ca9080 x21: ffffff8003ca9088 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffff8001eb2a00 x18: ffffff80efeeac80 x17: 756d2d6332692f30 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: ffffff8001d91d40 x13: 0000000000000016 x12: ffffffc080e98930 x11: ffffff8001eb2880 x10: 0000000000000890 x9 : ffffff8001d7a9f0 x8 : ffffff8001d92570 x7 : ffffff80efeeac80 x6 : 000000003fc6e780 x5 : ffffff8001d91c80 x4 : 0000000000000002 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: gpiod_set_value+0x74/0x7c ar0521_power_on+0xcc/0x290 ...

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3251Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht näher bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen..

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241023Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024, published on 23 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0999Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-012212Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 852b50aeed153b513c0b36298559114fab0fab80 < 9f08876d766755a92f1b9543ae3ee21bfc596fb8, 852b50aeed153b513c0b36298559114fab0fab80 < 625a77b68c96349c16fcc1faa42784313e0b1a85, 852b50aeed153b513c0b36298559114fab0fab80 < 2423b60a2d6d27e5f66c5021b494463aef2db212, 852b50aeed153b513c0b36298559114fab0fab80 < 3cf00ecfbf11ee8e6afff306a5bdcff4bf95d2cf, 852b50aeed153b513c0b36298559114fab0fab80 < bee1aed819a8cda47927436685d216906ed17f62, 6.0
Fixed
Linux: < 6.0, 6.1.113 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.55 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.10.14 ≤ 6.10.*, 6.11.3 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Oct 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:42 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-43640
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-49961 · cve.blacktree.nl