BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-49958High confidence

ocfs2: reserve space for inline xattr before attaching reflink tree

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.27% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

21 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 17 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.115-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
CVE-2024-49958 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 73 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-49958
306 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: reserve space for inline xattr before attaching reflink tree One of our customers reported a crash and a corrupted ocfs2 filesystem. The crash was due to the detection of corruption. Upon troubleshooting, the fsck -fn output showed the below corruption [EXTENT_LIST_FREE] Extent list in owner 33080590 claims 230 as the next free chain record, but fsck believes the largest valid value is 227. Clamp the next record value? n The stat output from the debugfs.ocfs2 showed the following corruption where the "Next Free Rec:" had overshot the "Count:" in the root metadata block. Inode: 33080590 Mode: 0640 Generation: 2619713622 (0x9c25a856) FS Generation: 904309833 (0x35e6ac49) CRC32: 00000000 ECC: 0000 Type: Regular Attr: 0x0 Flags: Valid Dynamic Features: (0x16) HasXattr InlineXattr Refcounted Extended Attributes Block: 0 Extended Attributes Inline Size: 256 User: 0 (root) Group: 0 (root) Size: 281320357888 Links: 1 Clusters: 141738 ctime: 0x66911b56 0x316edcb8 -- Fri Jul 12 06:02:30.829349048 2024 atime: 0x66911d6b 0x7f7a28d -- Fri Jul 12 06:11:23.133669517 2024 mtime: 0x66911b56 0x12ed75d7 -- Fri Jul 12 06:02:30.317552087 2024 dtime: 0x0 -- Wed Dec 31 17:00:00 1969 Refcount Block: 2777346 Last Extblk: 2886943 Orphan Slot: 0 Sub Alloc Slot: 0 Sub Alloc Bit: 14 Tree Depth: 1 Count: 227 Next Free Rec: 230 ## Offset Clusters Block# 0 0 2310 2776351 1 2310 2139 2777375 2 4449 1221 2778399 3 5670 731 2779423 4 6401 566 2780447 ....... .... ....... ....... .... ....... The issue was in the reflink workfow while reserving space for inline xattr. The problematic function is ocfs2_reflink_xattr_inline(). By the time this function is called the reflink tree is already recreated at the destination inode from the source inode. At this point, this function reserves space for inline xattrs at the destination inode without even checking if there is space at the root metadata block. It simply reduces the l_count from 243 to 227 thereby making space of 256 bytes for inline xattr whereas the inode already has extents beyond this index (in this case up to 230), thereby causing corruption. The fix for this is to reserve space for inline metadata at the destination inode before the reflink tree gets recreated. The customer has verified the fix.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2024-49958 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: ocfs2: reserve space for inline xattr before attaching reflink tree
198 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A flaw was found in ocfs2, a clustered file system in the Linux kernel. A local user, by performing reflink operations, can trigger an issue where space for inline extended attributes (xattrs) is incorrectly reserved. This improper reservation can lead to metadata corruption within the filesystem. The corruption may cause the filesystem to crash, potentially resulting in data loss.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
SSA-355557 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2
3 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
ocfs2: reserve space for inline xattr before attaching reflink tree.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-43637

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: reserve space for inline xattr before attaching reflink tree One of our customers reported a crash and a corrupted ocfs2 filesystem. The crash was due to the detection of corruption. Upon troubleshooting, the fsck -fn output showed the below corruption [EXTENT_LIST_FREE] Extent list in owner 33080590 claims 230 as the next free chain record, but fsck believes the largest valid value is 227. Clamp the next record value? n The stat output from the debugfs.ocfs2 showed the following corruption where the "Next Free Rec:" had overshot the "Count:" in the root metadata block. Inode: 33080590 Mode: 0640 Generation: 2619713622 (0x9c25a856) FS Generation: 904309833 (0x35e6ac49) CRC32: 00000000 ECC: 0000 Type: Regular Attr: 0x0 Flags: Valid Dynamic Features: (0x16) HasXattr InlineXattr Refcounted Extended Attributes Block: 0 Extended Attributes Inline Size: 256 User: 0 (root) Group: 0 (root) Size: 281320357888 Links: 1 Clusters: 141738 ctime: 0x66911b56 0x316edcb8 -- Fri Jul 12 06:02:30.829349048 2024 atime: 0x66911d6b 0x7f7a28d -- Fri Jul 12 06:11:23.133669517 2024 mtime: 0x66911b56 0x12ed75d7 -- Fri Jul 12 06:02:30.317552087 2024 dtime: 0x0 -- Wed Dec 31 17:00:00 1969 Refcount Block: 2777346 Last Extblk: 2886943 Orphan Slot: 0 Sub Alloc Slot: 0 Sub Alloc Bit: 14 Tree Depth: 1 Count: 227 Next Free Rec: 230 ## Offset Clusters Block# 0 0 2310 2776351 1 2310 2139 2777375 2 4449 1221 2778399 3 5670 731 2779423 4 6401 566 2780447 ....... .... ....... ....... .... ....... The issue was in the reflink workfow while reserving space for inline xattr. The problematic function is ocfs2_reflink_xattr_inline(). By the time this function is called the reflink tree is already recreated at the destination inode from the source inode. At this point, this function reserves space for inline xattrs at the destination inode without even checking if there is space at the root metadata block. It simply reduces the l_count from 243 to 227 thereby making space of 256 bytes for inline xattr whereas the inode already has extents beyond this index (in this case up to 230), thereby causing corruption. The fix for this is to reserve space for inline metadata at the destination inode before the reflink tree gets recreated. The customer has verified the fix.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: reserve space for inline xattr before attaching reflink tree One of our customers reported a crash and a corrupted ocfs2 filesystem. The crash was due to the detection of corruption. Upon troubleshooting, the fsck -fn output showed the below corruption [EXTENT_LIST_FREE] Extent list in owner 33080590 claims 230 as the next free chain record, but fsck believes the largest valid value is 227. Clamp the next record value? n The stat output from the debugfs.ocfs2 showed the following corruption where the "Next Free Rec:" had overshot the "Count:" in the root metadata block. Inode: 33080590 Mode: 0640 Generation: 2619713622 (0x9c25a856) FS Generation: 904309833 (0x35e6ac49) CRC32: 00000000 ECC: 0000 Type: Regular Attr: 0x0 Flags: Valid Dynamic Features: (0x16) HasXattr InlineXattr Refcounted Extended Attributes Block: 0 Extended Attributes Inline Size: 256 User: 0 (root) Group: 0 (root) Size: 281320357888 Links: 1 Clusters: 141738 ctime: 0x66911b56 0x316edcb8 -- Fri Jul 12 06:02:30.829349048 2024 atime: 0x66911d6b 0x7f7a28d -- Fri Jul 12 06:11:23.133669517 2024 mtime: 0x66911b56 0x12ed75d7 -- Fri Jul 12 06:02:30.317552087 2024 dtime: 0x0 -- Wed Dec 31 17:00:00 1969 Refcount Block: 2777346 Last Extblk: 2886943 Orphan Slot: 0 Sub Alloc Slot: 0 Sub Alloc Bit: 14 Tree Depth: 1 Count: 227 Next Free Rec: 230 ## Offset Clusters Block# 0 0 2310 2776351 1 2310 2139 2777375 2 4449 1221 2778399 3 5670 731 2779423 4 6401 566 2780447 ....... .... ....... ....... .... ....... The issue was in the reflink workfow while reserving space for inline xattr. The problematic function is ocfs2_reflink_xattr_inline(). By the time this function is called the reflink tree is already recreated at the destination inode from the source inode. At this point, this function reserves space for inline xattrs at the destination inode without even checking if there is space at the root metadata block. It simply reduces the l_count from 243 to 227 thereby making space of 256 bytes for inline xattr whereas the inode already has extents beyond this index (in this case up to 230), thereby causing corruption. The fix for this is to reserve space for inline metadata at the destination inode before the reflink tree gets recreated. The customer has verified the fix.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: reserve space for inline xattr before attaching reflink tree One of our customers reported a crash and a corrupted ocfs2 filesystem. The crash was due to the detection of corruption. Upon troubleshooting, the fsck -fn output showed the below corruption [EXTENT_LIST_FREE] Extent list in owner 33080590 claims 230 as the next free chain record, but fsck believes the largest valid value is 227. Clamp the next record value? n The stat output from the debugfs.ocfs2 showed the following corruption where the "Next Free Rec:" had overshot the "Count:" in the root metadata block. Inode: 33080590 Mode: 0640 Generation: 2619713622 (0x9c25a856) FS Generation: 904309833 (0x35e6ac49) CRC32: 00000000 ECC: 0000 Type: Regular Attr: 0x0 Flags: Valid Dynamic Features: (0x16) HasXattr InlineXattr Refcounted Extended Attributes Block: 0 Extended Attributes Inline Size: 256 User: 0 (root) Group: 0 (root) Size: 281320357888 Links: 1 Clusters: 141738 ctime: 0x66911b56 0x316edcb8 -- Fri Jul 12 06:02:30.829349048 2024 atime: 0x66911d6b 0x7f7a28d -- Fri Jul 12 06:11:23.133669517 2024 mtime: 0x66911b56 0x12ed75d7 -- Fri Jul 12 06:02:30.317552087 2024 dtime: 0x0 -- Wed Dec 31 17:00:00 1969 Refcount Block: 2777346 Last Extblk: 2886943 Orphan Slot: 0 Sub Alloc Slot: 0 Sub Alloc Bit: 14 Tree Depth: 1 Count: 227 Next Free Rec: 230 ## Offset Clusters Block# 0 0 2310 2776351 1 2310 2139 2777375 2 4449 1221 2778399 3 5670 731 2779423 4 6401 566 2780447 ....... .... ....... ....... .... ....... The issue was in the reflink workfow while reserving space for inline xattr. The problematic function is ocfs2_reflink_xattr_inline(). By the time this function is called the reflink tree is already recreated at the destination inode from the source inode. At this point, this function reserves space for inline xattrs at the destination inode without even checking if there is space at the root metadata block. It simply reduces the l_count from 243 to 227 thereby making space of 256 bytes for inline xattr whereas the inode already has extents beyond this index (in this case up to 230), thereby causing corruption. The fix for this is to reserve space for inline metadata at the destination inode before the reflink tree gets recreated. The customer has verified the fix.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3251Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht näher bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen..

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241023Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024, published on 23 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-49933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46753 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46812 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46821 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50116 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46753 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46812 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46821 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50116 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0069Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0024Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1108Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1101Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1048Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0999Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-012209Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.11, 4.19.323 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.285 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.227 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.168 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.113 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.55 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.10.14 ≤ 6.10.*, 6.11.3 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Oct 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-43637
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-49958 · cve.blacktree.nl