BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-49956High confidence

gfs2: fix double destroy_workqueue error

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 44 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 44 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-49956 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: gfs2: fix double destroy_workqueue error
42 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A flaw was found in the gfs2 component of the Linux kernel. This vulnerability occurs when the `gfs2_fill_super()` function fails, leading to a critical system resource, known as a work queue, being destroyed twice. This improper handling can cause system instability and a complete system crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for affected systems.
Remediation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-43635

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 44 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: fix double destroy_workqueue error When gfs2_fill_super() fails, destroy_workqueue() is called within gfs2_gl_hash_clear(), and the subsequent code path calls destroy_workqueue() on the same work queue again. This issue can be fixed by setting the work queue pointer to NULL after the first destroy_workqueue() call and checking for a NULL pointer before attempting to destroy the work queue again.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: fix double destroy_workqueue error When gfs2_fill_super() fails, destroy_workqueue() is called within gfs2_gl_hash_clear(), and the subsequent code path calls destroy_workqueue() on the same work queue again. This issue can be fixed by setting the work queue pointer to NULL after the first destroy_workqueue() call and checking for a NULL pointer before attempting to destroy the work queue again.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: fix double destroy_workqueue error When gfs2_fill_super() fails, destroy_workqueue() is called within gfs2_gl_hash_clear(), and the subsequent code path calls destroy_workqueue() on the same work queue again. This issue can be fixed by setting the work queue pointer to NULL after the first destroy_workqueue() call and checking for a NULL pointer before attempting to destroy the work queue again.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3251Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht näher bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen..

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241023Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024, published on 23 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-011925Linux の Linux Kernel における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.11, 6.11.3 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Oct 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-43635
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-49956 · cve.blacktree.nl