BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-49878High confidence

resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed()

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-355557 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.30% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

21 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 17 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.115-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-355557 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2
3 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
resource: Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() during onlining CXL memory, which makes "System RAM (kmem)" a descendant of "CXL Window X". This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all "System RAM" resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource.
Remediation
Update to V3.2 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-43825

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed() On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related to CXL memory may look like something as follows. 490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0 490000000-50fffffff : region0 490000000-50fffffff : dax0.0 490000000-50fffffff : System RAM (kmem) Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() during onlining CXL memory, which makes "System RAM (kmem)" a descendant of "CXL Window X". This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all "System RAM" resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource. This can lead to bugs. For example, when the following command line is executed to write some memory in CXL memory range via /dev/mem, $ dd if=data of=/dev/mem bs=$((1 << 10)) seek=$((0x490000000 >> 10)) count=1 dd: error writing '/dev/mem': Bad address 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes copied, 0.0283507 s, 0.0 kB/s the command fails as expected. However, the error code is wrong. It should be "Operation not permitted" instead of "Bad address". More seriously, the /dev/mem permission checking in devmem_is_allowed() passes incorrectly. Although the accessing is prevented later because ioremap() isn't allowed to map system RAM, it is a potential security issue. During command executing, the following warning is reported in the kernel log for calling ioremap() on system RAM. ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000490000000 - 0x0000000490000fff WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 416 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:216 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x131/0x35d Call Trace: memremap+0xcb/0x184 xlate_dev_mem_ptr+0x25/0x2f write_mem+0x94/0xfb vfs_write+0x128/0x26d ksys_write+0xac/0xfe do_syscall_64+0x9a/0xfd entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The details of command execution process are as follows. In the above resource tree, "System RAM" is a descendant of "CXL Window 0" instead of a top level resource. So, region_intersects() will report no System RAM resources in the CXL memory region incorrectly, because it only checks the top level resources. Consequently, devmem_is_allowed() will return 1 (allow access via /dev/mem) for CXL memory region incorrectly. Fortunately, ioremap() doesn't allow to map System RAM and reject the access. So, region_intersects() needs to be fixed to work correctly with the resource tree with "System RAM" not at top level as above. To fix it, if we found a unmatched resource in the top level, we will continue to search matched resources in its descendant resources. So, we will not miss any matched resources in resource tree anymore. In the new implementation, an example resource tree |------------- "CXL Window 0" ------------| |-- "System RAM" --| will behave similar as the following fake resource tree for region_intersects(, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, ), |-- "System RAM" --||-- "CXL Window 0a" --| Where "CXL Window 0a" is part of the original "CXL Window 0" that isn't covered by "System RAM".

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed() On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related to CXL memory may look like something as follows. 490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0 490000000-50fffffff : region0 490000000-50fffffff : dax0.0 490000000-50fffffff : System RAM (kmem) Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() during onlining CXL memory, which makes "System RAM (kmem)" a descendant of "CXL Window X". This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all "System RAM" resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource. This can lead to bugs. For example, when the following command line is executed to write some memory in CXL memory range via /dev/mem, $ dd if=data of=/dev/mem bs=$((1 << 10)) seek=$((0x490000000 >> 10)) count=1 dd: error writing '/dev/mem': Bad address 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes copied, 0.0283507 s, 0.0 kB/s the command fails as expected. However, the error code is wrong. It should be "Operation not permitted" instead of "Bad address". More seriously, the /dev/mem permission checking in devmem_is_allowed() passes incorrectly. Although the accessing is prevented later because ioremap() isn't allowed to map system RAM, it is a potential security issue. During command executing, the following warning is reported in the kernel log for calling ioremap() on system RAM. ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000490000000 - 0x0000000490000fff WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 416 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:216 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x131/0x35d Call Trace: memremap+0xcb/0x184 xlate_dev_mem_ptr+0x25/0x2f write_mem+0x94/0xfb vfs_write+0x128/0x26d ksys_write+0xac/0xfe do_syscall_64+0x9a/0xfd entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The details of command execution process are as follows. In the above resource tree, "System RAM" is a descendant of "CXL Window 0" instead of a top level resource. So, region_intersects() will report no System RAM resources in the CXL memory region incorrectly, because it only checks the top level resources. Consequently, devmem_is_allowed() will return 1 (allow access via /dev/mem) for CXL memory region incorrectly. Fortunately, ioremap() doesn't allow to map System RAM and reject the access. So, region_intersects() needs to be fixed to work correctly with the resource tree with "System RAM" not at top level as above. To fix it, if we found a unmatched resource in the top level, we will continue to search matched resources in its descendant resources. So, we will not miss any matched resources in resource tree anymore. In the new implementation, an example resource tree |------------- "CXL Window 0" ------------| |-- "System RAM" --| will behave similar as the following fake resource tree for region_intersects(, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, ), |-- "System RAM" --||-- "CXL Window 0a" --| Where "CXL Window 0a" is part of the original "CXL Window 0" that isn't covered by "System RAM".

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed() On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related to CXL memory may look like something as follows. 490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0 490000000-50fffffff : region0 490000000-50fffffff : dax0.0 490000000-50fffffff : System RAM (kmem) Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() during onlining CXL memory, which makes "System RAM (kmem)" a descendant of "CXL Window X". This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all "System RAM" resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource. This can lead to bugs. For example, when the following command line is executed to write some memory in CXL memory range via /dev/mem, $ dd if=data of=/dev/mem bs=$((1 << 10)) seek=$((0x490000000 >> 10)) count=1 dd: error writing '/dev/mem': Bad address 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes copied, 0.0283507 s, 0.0 kB/s the command fails as expected. However, the error code is wrong. It should be "Operation not permitted" instead of "Bad address". More seriously, the /dev/mem permission checking in devmem_is_allowed() passes incorrectly. Although the accessing is prevented later because ioremap() isn't allowed to map system RAM, it is a potential security issue. During command executing, the following warning is reported in the kernel log for calling ioremap() on system RAM. ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000490000000 - 0x0000000490000fff WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 416 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:216 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x131/0x35d Call Trace: memremap+0xcb/0x184 xlate_dev_mem_ptr+0x25/0x2f write_mem+0x94/0xfb vfs_write+0x128/0x26d ksys_write+0xac/0xfe do_syscall_64+0x9a/0xfd entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The details of command execution process are as follows. In the above resource tree, "System RAM" is a descendant of "CXL Window 0" instead of a top level resource. So, region_intersects() will report no System RAM resources in the CXL memory region incorrectly, because it only checks the top level resources. Consequently, devmem_is_allowed() will return 1 (allow access via /dev/mem) for CXL memory region incorrectly. Fortunately, ioremap() doesn't allow to map System RAM and reject the access. So, region_intersects() needs to be fixed to work correctly with the resource tree with "System RAM" not at top level as above. To fix it, if we found a unmatched resource in the top level, we will continue to search matched resources in its descendant resources. So, we will not miss any matched resources in resource tree anymore. In the new implementation, an example resource tree |------------- "CXL Window 0" ------------| |-- "System RAM" --| will behave similar as the following fake resource tree for region_intersects(, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, ), |-- "System RAM" --||-- "CXL Window 0a" --| Where "CXL Window 0a" is part of the original "CXL Window 0" that isn't covered by "System RAM".

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3251Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht näher bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen..

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241023Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024, published on 23 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-48881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-49851 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0069Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1108Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1101Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0999Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-49863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-012553Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.1, 5.4.285 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.227 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.168 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.113 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.55 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.10.14 ≤ 6.10.*, 6.11.3 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Oct 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:40 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-43825
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-49878 · cve.blacktree.nl