BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-47794High confidence

bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-47794 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 57 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-47794
204 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a combination of tail calls and freplace. In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop: entry_tc -> subprog_tc -> entry_freplace --tailcall-> entry_tc. The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic. To fix this issue, the solution is twofold: 1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a prog_array map. 2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map with an freplace program. This ensures that: * If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program, it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map. * If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its subprograms can be extended by an freplace program. Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return -EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a prog_array map. Additionally, fix a minor code style issue by replacing eight spaces with a tab for proper formatting.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-42878

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a combination of tail calls and freplace. In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop: entry_tc -> subprog_tc -> entry_freplace --tailcall-> entry_tc. The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic. To fix this issue, the solution is twofold: 1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a prog_array map. 2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map with an freplace program. This ensures that: * If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program, it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map. * If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its subprograms can be extended by an freplace program. Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return -EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a prog_array map. Additionally, fix a minor code style issue by replacing eight spaces with a tab for proper formatting.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a combination of tail calls and freplace. In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop: entry_tc -> subprog_tc -> entry_freplace --tailcall-> entry_tc. The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic. To fix this issue, the solution is twofold: 1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a prog_array map. 2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map with an freplace program. This ensures that: * If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program, it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map. * If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its subprograms can be extended by an freplace program. Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return -EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a prog_array map. Additionally, fix a minor code style issue by replacing eight spaces with a tab for proper formatting.

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a combination of tail calls and freplace. In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop: entry_tc -> subprog_tc -> entry_freplace --tailcall-> entry_tc. The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic. To fix this issue, the solution is twofold: 1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a prog_array map. 2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map with an freplace program. This ensures that: * If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program, it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map. * If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its subprograms can be extended by an freplace program. Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return -EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a prog_array map. Additionally, fix a minor code style issue by replacing eight spaces with a tab for proper formatting.

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-835 ↗

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop'). The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-835
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0047Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250115Security Bulletin 15 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 15 Jan 2025, published on 15 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49504 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49504 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-45021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46751 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46752 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49570 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46796 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50029 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50036 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-47739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-46841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47707 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47711 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47730 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-42229 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46796 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50126 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-38558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028178Linux の Linux Kernel における無限ループに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、無限ループに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.6, 6.12.5 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Jan 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC · CWE-835 · Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-42878
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-42878↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-47794 · cve.blacktree.nl