BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-47689High confidence

f2fs: fix to don't set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error()

Linux · Linux

5.3MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.62% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

21 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 17 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-42609

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to don't set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error() syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 58 at kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0 Workqueue: events destroy_super_work RIP: 0010:rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 Call Trace: percpu_free_rwsem+0x41/0x80 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:42 destroy_super_work+0xec/0x130 fs/super.c:282 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd40 kernel/workqueue.c:3390 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 As Christian Brauner pointed out [1]: the root cause is f2fs sets SB_RDONLY flag in internal function, rather than setting the flag covered w/ sb->s_umount semaphore via remount procedure, then below race condition causes this bug: - freeze_super() - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - f2fs_handle_critical_error - sb->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY - thaw_super - thaw_super_locked - sb_rdonly() is true, so it skips sb_freeze_unlock(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - deactivate_locked_super Since f2fs has almost the same logic as ext4 [2] when handling critical error in filesystem if it mounts w/ errors=remount-ro option: - set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag which indicates filesystem is stopped - record errors to superblock - set SB_RDONLY falg Once we set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag, all writable interfaces can detect the flag and stop any further updates on filesystem. So, it is safe to not set SB_RDONLY flag, let's remove the logic and keep in line w/ ext4 [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729-himbeeren-funknetz-96e62f9c7aee@brauner [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729132721.hxih6ehigadqf7wx@quack3 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240805201241.27286-1-jack@suse.cz

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to don't set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error() syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 58 at kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0 Workqueue: events destroy_super_work RIP: 0010:rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 Call Trace: percpu_free_rwsem+0x41/0x80 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:42 destroy_super_work+0xec/0x130 fs/super.c:282 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd40 kernel/workqueue.c:3390 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 As Christian Brauner pointed out [1]: the root cause is f2fs sets SB_RDONLY flag in internal function, rather than setting the flag covered w/ sb->s_umount semaphore via remount procedure, then below race condition causes this bug: - freeze_super() - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - f2fs_handle_critical_error - sb->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY - thaw_super - thaw_super_locked - sb_rdonly() is true, so it skips sb_freeze_unlock(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - deactivate_locked_super Since f2fs has almost the same logic as ext4 [2] when handling critical error in filesystem if it mounts w/ errors=remount-ro option: - set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag which indicates filesystem is stopped - record errors to superblock - set SB_RDONLY falg Once we set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag, all writable interfaces can detect the flag and stop any further updates on filesystem. So, it is safe to not set SB_RDONLY flag, let's remove the logic and keep in line w/ ext4 [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729-himbeeren-funknetz-96e62f9c7aee@brauner [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729132721.hxih6ehigadqf7wx@quack3 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240805201241.27286-1-jack@suse.cz

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to don't set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error() syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 58 at kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0 Workqueue: events destroy_super_work RIP: 0010:rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 Call Trace: percpu_free_rwsem+0x41/0x80 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:42 destroy_super_work+0xec/0x130 fs/super.c:282 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd40 kernel/workqueue.c:3390 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 As Christian Brauner pointed out [1]: the root cause is f2fs sets SB_RDONLY flag in internal function, rather than setting the flag covered w/ sb->s_umount semaphore via remount procedure, then below race condition causes this bug: - freeze_super() - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - f2fs_handle_critical_error - sb->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY - thaw_super - thaw_super_locked - sb_rdonly() is true, so it skips sb_freeze_unlock(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - deactivate_locked_super Since f2fs has almost the same logic as ext4 [2] when handling critical error in filesystem if it mounts w/ errors=remount-ro option: - set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag which indicates filesystem is stopped - record errors to superblock - set SB_RDONLY falg Once we set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag, all writable interfaces can detect the flag and stop any further updates on filesystem. So, it is safe to not set SB_RDONLY flag, let's remove the logic and keep in line w/ ext4 [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729-himbeeren-funknetz-96e62f9c7aee@brauner [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729132721.hxih6ehigadqf7wx@quack3 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240805201241.27286-1-jack@suse.cz

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3251Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht näher bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen..

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241023Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024, published on 23 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2024-47141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-4741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2024-47141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-4741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47670 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47671 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47672 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47690 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47693 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47682 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47687 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47688 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47690 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47693 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-47679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47682 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47687 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47688 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47690 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47693 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47694 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47682 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47687 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47688 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47690 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47693 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-47679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47682 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47687 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47688 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47690 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47693 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47694 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-011115Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: b62e71be2110d8b52bf5faf3c3ed7ca1a0c113a5 < 649ec8b30df113042588bd3d3cd4e98bcb1091e0, b62e71be2110d8b52bf5faf3c3ed7ca1a0c113a5 < de43021c72993877a8f86f9fddfa0687609da5a4, b62e71be2110d8b52bf5faf3c3ed7ca1a0c113a5 < 1f63f405c1a1a64b9c310388aad7055fb86b245c, b62e71be2110d8b52bf5faf3c3ed7ca1a0c113a5 < 930c6ab93492c4b15436524e704950b364b2930c, ed1d478bf838820201f3fb67a1748fdf15954ea4, 6.4.4 < 6.5, 6.5
Fixed
Linux: < 6.5, 6.6.54 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.10.13 ≤ 6.10.*, 6.11.2 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Oct 2024 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:53 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-42609
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-47689 · cve.blacktree.nl