Published severityCritical→Operational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged
Evidence used
CISA confirms exploitation in the wild.
A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
EPSS is 94.77% for the current model date.
Compensating controls
Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.
Verification
Confirm that the asset runs Fortinet FortiManager and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Optional official sources
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2024-42531
CISA KEV mirrored by ENISA
A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7.6.0, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, FortiManager 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, FortiManager 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.12, FortiManager Cloud 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Recorded by ENISA since 23 Oct 2024. Evidence sources: cisa_kev.
ENISA score
9.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
2 linked advisory records
Recommended actionPatch now
CISA confirms exploitation in the wild and lists 2024-11-13 as the remediation due date.
Patch available
01
What, why and how
Fortinet FortiManager contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the fgfmd daemon that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
What
Fortinet FortiManager contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the fgfmd daemon that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
Why
A security-sensitive function is reachable without the authentication check that should protect it.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
What
Fortinet FortiManager contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the fgfmd daemon that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
Why
A security-sensitive function is reachable without the authentication check that should protect it.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Confirmed in the wild
CISA added this CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on 2024-10-23.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
Likely attack path
a network path → Missing Authentication for Critical Function → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function. The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-42531Known-exploited evidence recorded
A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7.6.0, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, FortiManager 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, FortiManager 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.12, FortiManager Cloud 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
Official EUVD record ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3260Fortinet FortiManager: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung
Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Fortinet FortiManager ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.
Official advisory ↗Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV24-608Fortinet security advisory (AV24-608)
On October 23, 2024, Fortinet published security advisories to address a vulnerability in multiple products. Included was a critical update for the following products::
Fortinet has received reports that CVE-2024-47575 has been exploited.
Official advisory ↗Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241030Security Bulletin 30 Oct 2024
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Oct 2024, published on 30 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0917Vulnérabilité dans Fortinet FortiManager
Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans Fortinet FortiManager. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance.
Fortinet indique que la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-47575 est activement exploitée.
Official advisory ↗KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6324Fortinet 제품 보안 업데이트 권고
Fortinet의 FortiManager, FortiManager Cloud에서 발생하는 임의 코드 실행 취약점(CVE-2024-47575) [2]
Official advisory ↗KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6323美 CISA 발표 주요 Exploit 정보공유(Update. 2024-10-23)
Fortinet FortiManager contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the fgfmd daemon that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
Official advisory ↗NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0423Kwetsbaarheid ontdekt in Fortinet FortiManager
Er is, voor de bekendmaking van de CVE en patch, misbruik van CVE-2024-47575 waargenomen. Er bestaat daarmee een risico op misbruik van deze CVE voordat de beschikbare patch is geïnstalleerd.
Het NCSC adviseert om, naast het patchen van uw FortiManager met de beschikbaar gestelde patch, onderzoek te doen aan de hand van beschikbare Indicators of Compromise (IoC’s) om mogelijk misbruik te onderkennen.
Een kwaadwillende kan toegang hebben gehad tot uw FortiManager omgeving door een ander Fortinet serienummer in uw FortiManager te registreren. Via het certificaat zou de kwaadwillende de authenticatie hebben kunnen omzeilen. Fortinet heeft in de FG-IR-24-423 advisory IoC's beschikbaar gesteld die kunnen helpen bij forensisch onderzoek (zie referentie).
De aanval stelt een kwaadwillende in staat om configuratie gegevens op te halen van uw firewall/netwerk omgeving. Ook stelt dit een kwaadwillende in staat om (VPN) account credentials en certificaten in te zien, welke de mogelijkheid geven om via bestaande accounts uw netwerk te betreden.
Mocht u indicatoren zien van misbruik, adviseert het NCSC daarom ook om accounts te resetten en certificaten te vernieuwen. Wat precies in een aanval gestolen zou kunnen zijn ligt echter aan de geïmplementeerde configuratie en kan per casus verschillen.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
7.6.0; 7.4.0 ≤ 7.4.4; 7.2.0 ≤ 7.2.7; 7.0.0 ≤ 7.0.12; 6.4.0 ≤ 6.4.14; 6.2.0 ≤ 6.2.12 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
After
FortiManager: 7.6.0, 7.4.0 ≤ 7.4.4, 7.2.0 ≤ 7.2.7, 7.0.0 ≤ 7.0.12, 6.4.0 ≤ 6.4.14, 6.2.0 ≤ 6.2.12 · Fixed: Please upgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 7.6.2 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 7.4.5 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 7.2.8 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager Cloud version 7.0.13 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager version 7.6.1 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager version 7.4.5 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager version 7.2.8 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager version 7.0.13 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager version 6.4.15 or above; Please upgrade to FortiManager version 6.2.13 or above
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.