BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-43880High confidence

mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

15 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-355557 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2
3 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: object nesting warning.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
SSA-613116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-613116: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.1
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: object nesting warning.
Remediation
Update to V3.1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-40530

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM (A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each region (i.e., tc chain) is limited. In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters. The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in different TCAMs cannot share a mask. The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by looking at all the existing objects. When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the A-TCAM. The above can result in the following set of hints: H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during the transition. Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive) will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by the library [1]. Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will only return exact matches. I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour. Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next. [1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580 objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80 mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510 process_one_work+0x151/0x370

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM (A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each region (i.e., tc chain) is limited. In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters. The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in different TCAMs cannot share a mask. The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by looking at all the existing objects. When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the A-TCAM. The above can result in the following set of hints: H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during the transition. Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive) will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by the library [1]. Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will only return exact matches. I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour. Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next. [1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580 objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80 mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510 process_one_work+0x151/0x370

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM (A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each region (i.e., tc chain) is limited. In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters. The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in different TCAMs cannot share a mask. The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by looking at all the existing objects. When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the A-TCAM. The above can result in the following set of hints: H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during the transition. Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive) will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by the library [1]. Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will only return exact matches. I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour. Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next. [1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580 objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80 mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510 process_one_work+0x151/0x370

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-1888Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-42232 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0588Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-26717 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0401Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Secure Analytics

ord?id=CVE-2024-41093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42292 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-4317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4317 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0106Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2024-42070 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42292 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-4317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4317 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43788 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-43868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-43868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1080Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-43868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1013Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-43861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0997Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-43861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0957Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-43854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43856 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-41092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42292 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0872Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-43853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43856 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0840Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-43860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0822Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-43867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-43867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00); SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Fixed
< 5.1; 5.4.282 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.224 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.165 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.103 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.44 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.10.3 ≤ 6.10.*; 6.11 ≤ *
Action
Update to V3.1 or later version
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Aug 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-40530
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-43880 · cve.blacktree.nl