BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-43828High confidence

ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

15 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable. Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039. This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range(). Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-40478

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable. Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039. This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range(). Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable. Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039. This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range(). Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable. Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039. This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range(). Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-835

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop'). The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-835
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-2855IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder andere, nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-1875Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder unbekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-43818 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43819 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43821 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43825 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43827 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43833 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-42314 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42316 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42318 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42322 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43818 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43833 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43837 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1080Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-43818 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43819 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43821 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43825 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43827 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43833 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1013Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-42305 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42306 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42309 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42310 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42311 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42312 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42313 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42318 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43846 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0997Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-42305 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42306 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42309 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42310 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42311 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42312 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42313 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42318 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43846 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0872Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-42304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42305 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42306 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42308 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42309 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42310 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42311 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42312 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42313 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43846 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0870Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-42243 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42252 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42259 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42265 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42294 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42305 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42306 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43845 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Fixed
< 5.10; 5.10.224 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.165 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.103 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.44 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.10.3 ≤ 6.10.*; 6.11 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 Aug 2024 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 11:56 UTC · CWE-835 · Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-40478
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-43828 · cve.blacktree.nl