BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-41048High confidence

skmsg: Skip zero length skb in sk_msg_recvmsg

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 73 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.80% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 73 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

19 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 15 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.106-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2024-41048 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 71 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-41048
197 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: skmsg: Skip zero length skb in sk_msg_recvmsg When running BPF selftests (./test_progs -t sockmap_basic) on a Loongarch platform, the following kernel panic occurs: [...] Oops[#1]: CPU: 22 PID: 2824 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #18 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018 ... ... ra: 90000000048bf6c0 sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 ERA: 9000000004162774 copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack Process test_progs (pid: 2824, threadinfo=0000000000863a31, task=...) Stack : ... Call Trace: [ ] copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 [ ] sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 [ ] tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x170/0x4e0 [ ] inet_recvmsg+0x54/0x100 [ ] sock_recvmsg+0x7c/0xe0 [ ] __sys_recvfrom+0x108/0x1c0 [ ] sys_recvfrom+0x1c/0x40 [ ] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [ ] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: ... ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Kernel relocated by 0x3510000 .text @ 0x9000000003710000 .data @ 0x9000000004d70000 .bss @ 0x9000000006469400 ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]--- [...] This crash happens every time when running sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown subtest in sockmap_basic. This crash is because a NULL pointer is passed to page_address() in the sk_msg_recvmsg(). Due to the different implementations depending on the architecture, page_address(NULL) will trigger a panic on Loongarch platform but not on x86 platform. So this bug was hidden on x86 platform for a while, but now it is exposed on Loongarch platform. The root cause is that a zero length skb (skb->len == 0) was put on the queue. This zero length skb is a TCP FIN packet, which was sent by shutdown(), invoked in test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown(): shutdown(p1, SHUT_WR); In this case, in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(), num_sge is zero, and no page is put to this sge (see sg_set_page in sg_set_page), but this empty sge is queued into ingress_msg list. And in sk_msg_recvmsg(), this empty sge is used, and a NULL page is got by sg_page(sge). Pass this NULL page to copy_page_to_iter(), which passes it to kmap_local_page() and to page_address(), then kernel panics. To solve this, we should skip this zero length skb. So in sk_msg_recvmsg(), if copy is zero, that means it's a zero length skb, skip invoking copy_page_to_iter(). We are using the EFAULT return triggered by copy_page_to_iter to check for is_fin in tcp_bpf.c.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2024-41048 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: skmsg: Skip zero length skb in sk_msg_recvmsg
58 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A zero-length socket buffer (skb) can be placed on the sk_msg ingress queue. This occurs when a TCP FIN is processed, such as when shutdown(p1, SHUT_WR) is called. Because the skb has zero length, no memory page is associated with its scatter-gather entry. Later, sk_msg_recvmsg() processes this empty entry and obtains a NULL page pointer through sg_page(). The NULL pointer is then passed through copy_page_to_iter() to kmap_local_page()/page_address(). On architectures such as LoongArch, this results in a kernel panic. The issue was less visible on x86 because of architecture-specific page_address() behavior.
Remediation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-39078

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 73 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: skmsg: Skip zero length skb in sk_msg_recvmsg When running BPF selftests (./test_progs -t sockmap_basic) on a Loongarch platform, the following kernel panic occurs: [...] Oops[#1]: CPU: 22 PID: 2824 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #18 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018 ... ... ra: 90000000048bf6c0 sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 ERA: 9000000004162774 copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack Process test_progs (pid: 2824, threadinfo=0000000000863a31, task=...) Stack : ... Call Trace: [<9000000004162774>] copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 [<90000000048bf6c0>] sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 [<90000000049f2b90>] tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x170/0x4e0 [<90000000049aae34>] inet_recvmsg+0x54/0x100 [<900000000481ad5c>] sock_recvmsg+0x7c/0xe0 [<900000000481e1a8>] __sys_recvfrom+0x108/0x1c0 [<900000000481e27c>] sys_recvfrom+0x1c/0x40 [<9000000004c076ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<9000000003731da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: ... ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Kernel relocated by 0x3510000 .text @ 0x9000000003710000 .data @ 0x9000000004d70000 .bss @ 0x9000000006469400 ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]--- [...] This crash happens every time when running sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown subtest in sockmap_basic. This crash is because a NULL pointer is passed to page_address() in the sk_msg_recvmsg(). Due to the different implementations depending on the architecture, page_address(NULL) will trigger a panic on Loongarch platform but not on x86 platform. So this bug was hidden on x86 platform for a while, but now it is exposed on Loongarch platform. The root cause is that a zero length skb (skb->len == 0) was put on the queue. This zero length skb is a TCP FIN packet, which was sent by shutdown(), invoked in test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown(): shutdown(p1, SHUT_WR); In this case, in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(), num_sge is zero, and no page is put to this sge (see sg_set_page in sg_set_page), but this empty sge is queued into ingress_msg list. And in sk_msg_recvmsg(), this empty sge is used, and a NULL page is got by sg_page(sge). Pass this NULL page to copy_page_to_iter(), which passes it to kmap_local_page() and to page_address(), then kernel panics. To solve this, we should skip this zero length skb. So in sk_msg_recvmsg(), if copy is zero, that means it's a zero length skb, skip invoking copy_page_to_iter(). We are using the EFAULT return triggered by copy_page_to_iter to check for is_fin in tcp_bpf.c.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: skmsg: Skip zero length skb in sk_msg_recvmsg When running BPF selftests (./test_progs -t sockmap_basic) on a Loongarch platform, the following kernel panic occurs: [...] Oops[#1]: CPU: 22 PID: 2824 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #18 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018 ... ... ra: 90000000048bf6c0 sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 ERA: 9000000004162774 copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack Process test_progs (pid: 2824, threadinfo=0000000000863a31, task=...) Stack : ... Call Trace: [<9000000004162774>] copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 [<90000000048bf6c0>] sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 [<90000000049f2b90>] tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x170/0x4e0 [<90000000049aae34>] inet_recvmsg+0x54/0x100 [<900000000481ad5c>] sock_recvmsg+0x7c/0xe0 [<900000000481e1a8>] __sys_recvfrom+0x108/0x1c0 [<900000000481e27c>] sys_recvfrom+0x1c/0x40 [<9000000004c076ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<9000000003731da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: ... ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Kernel relocated by 0x3510000 .text @ 0x9000000003710000 .data @ 0x9000000004d70000 .bss @ 0x9000000006469400 ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]--- [...] This crash happens every time when running sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown subtest in sockmap_basic. This crash is because a NULL pointer is passed to page_address() in the sk_msg_recvmsg(). Due to the different implementations depending on the architecture, page_address(NULL) will trigger a panic on Loongarch platform but not on x86 platform. So this bug was hidden on x86 platform for a while, but now it is exposed on Loongarch platform. The root cause is that a zero length skb (skb->len == 0) was put on the queue. This zero length skb is a TCP FIN packet, which was sent by shutdown(), invoked in test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown(): shutdown(p1, SHUT_WR); In this case, in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(), num_sge is zero, and no page is put to this sge (see sg_set_page in sg_set_page), but this empty sge is queued into ingress_msg list. And in sk_msg_recvmsg(), this empty sge is used, and a NULL page is got by sg_page(sge). Pass this NULL page to copy_page_to_iter(), which passes it to kmap_local_page() and to page_address(), then kernel panics. To solve this, we should skip this zero length skb. So in sk_msg_recvmsg(), if copy is zero, that means it's a zero length skb, skip invoking copy_page_to_iter(). We are using the EFAULT return triggered by copy_page_to_iter to check for is_fin in tcp_bpf.c.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: skmsg: Skip zero length skb in sk_msg_recvmsg When running BPF selftests (./test_progs -t sockmap_basic) on a Loongarch platform, the following kernel panic occurs: [...] Oops[#1]: CPU: 22 PID: 2824 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #18 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018 ... ... ra: 90000000048bf6c0 sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 ERA: 9000000004162774 copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack Process test_progs (pid: 2824, threadinfo=0000000000863a31, task=...) Stack : ... Call Trace: [<9000000004162774>] copy_page_to_iter+0x74/0x1c0 [<90000000048bf6c0>] sk_msg_recvmsg+0x120/0x560 [<90000000049f2b90>] tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x170/0x4e0 [<90000000049aae34>] inet_recvmsg+0x54/0x100 [<900000000481ad5c>] sock_recvmsg+0x7c/0xe0 [<900000000481e1a8>] __sys_recvfrom+0x108/0x1c0 [<900000000481e27c>] sys_recvfrom+0x1c/0x40 [<9000000004c076ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<9000000003731da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: ... ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Kernel relocated by 0x3510000 .text @ 0x9000000003710000 .data @ 0x9000000004d70000 .bss @ 0x9000000006469400 ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]--- [...] This crash happens every time when running sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown subtest in sockmap_basic. This crash is because a NULL pointer is passed to page_address() in the sk_msg_recvmsg(). Due to the different implementations depending on the architecture, page_address(NULL) will trigger a panic on Loongarch platform but not on x86 platform. So this bug was hidden on x86 platform for a while, but now it is exposed on Loongarch platform. The root cause is that a zero length skb (skb->len == 0) was put on the queue. This zero length skb is a TCP FIN packet, which was sent by shutdown(), invoked in test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown(): shutdown(p1, SHUT_WR); In this case, in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(), num_sge is zero, and no page is put to this sge (see sg_set_page in sg_set_page), but this empty sge is queued into ingress_msg list. And in sk_msg_recvmsg(), this empty sge is used, and a NULL page is got by sg_page(sge). Pass this NULL page to copy_page_to_iter(), which passes it to kmap_local_page() and to page_address(), then kernel panics. To solve this, we should skip this zero length skb. So in sk_msg_recvmsg(), if copy is zero, that means it's a zero length skb, skip invoking copy_page_to_iter(). We are using the EFAULT return triggered by copy_page_to_iter to check for is_fin in tcp_bpf.c.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1722Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240731Security Bulletin 31 Jul 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 31 Jul 2024, published on 31 July 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-41036 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1080Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-41037 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1013Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-41037 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0997Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-41037 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0957Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-41037 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0822Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41036 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41037 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-41036 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41037 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-41012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-41012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-018414Linux の Linux Kernel における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.20, 5.15.163 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.100 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.41 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.9.10 ≤ 6.9.*, 6.10 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Jul 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-39078
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-41048 · cve.blacktree.nl