BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-41000High confidence

block/ioctl: prefer different overflow check

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-265688 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.30% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.99-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
block/ioctl: prefer different overflow check Running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer overflow sanitizer.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-355557 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2
3 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
block/ioctl: prefer different overflow check Running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer overflow sanitizer.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
SSA-613116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-613116: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.1
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
block/ioctl: prefer different overflow check Running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer overflow sanitizer.
Remediation
Update to V3.1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-39349

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block/ioctl: prefer different overflow check Running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer overflow sanitizer shows this report: [ 62.982337] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 62.985692] cgroup: Invalid name [ 62.986211] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../block/ioctl.c:36:46 [ 62.989370] 9pnet_fd: p9_fd_create_tcp (7343): problem connecting socket to 127.0.0.1 [ 62.992992] 9223372036854775807 + 4095 cannot be represented in type 'long long' [ 62.997827] 9pnet_fd: p9_fd_create_tcp (7345): problem connecting socket to 127.0.0.1 [ 62.999369] random: crng reseeded on system resumption [ 63.000634] GUP no longer grows the stack in syz-executor.2 (7353): 20002000-20003000 (20001000) [ 63.000668] CPU: 0 PID: 7353 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-00035-gb3ef86b5a957 #1 [ 63.000677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [ 63.000682] Call Trace: [ 63.000686] <TASK> [ 63.000731] dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0 [ 63.000919] __get_user_pages+0x903/0xd30 [ 63.001030] __gup_longterm_locked+0x153e/0x1ba0 [ 63.001041] ? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x17/0x50 [ 63.001072] ? try_get_folio+0x29c/0x2d0 [ 63.001083] internal_get_user_pages_fast+0x1119/0x1530 [ 63.001109] iov_iter_extract_pages+0x23b/0x580 [ 63.001206] bio_iov_iter_get_pages+0x4de/0x1220 [ 63.001235] iomap_dio_bio_iter+0x9b6/0x1410 [ 63.001297] __iomap_dio_rw+0xab4/0x1810 [ 63.001316] iomap_dio_rw+0x45/0xa0 [ 63.001328] ext4_file_write_iter+0xdde/0x1390 [ 63.001372] vfs_write+0x599/0xbd0 [ 63.001394] ksys_write+0xc8/0x190 [ 63.001403] do_syscall_64+0xd4/0x1b0 [ 63.001421] ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x3a/0x60 [ 63.001479] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 [ 63.001535] RIP: 0033:0x7f7fd3ebf539 [ 63.001551] Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 63.001562] RSP: 002b:00007f7fd32570c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 63.001584] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7fd3ff3f80 RCX: 00007f7fd3ebf539 [ 63.001590] RDX: 4db6d1e4f7e43360 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 63.001595] RBP: 00007f7fd3f1e496 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 63.001599] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 63.001604] R13: 0000000000000006 R14: 00007f7fd3ff3f80 R15: 00007ffd415ad2b8 ... [ 63.018142] ---[ end trace ]--- Historically, the signed integer overflow sanitizer did not work in the kernel due to its interaction with `-fwrapv` but this has since been changed [1] in the newest version of Clang; It was re-enabled in the kernel with Commit 557f8c582a9ba8ab ("ubsan: Reintroduce signed overflow sanitizer"). Let's rework this overflow checking logic to not actually perform an overflow during the check itself, thus avoiding the UBSAN splat. [1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block/ioctl: prefer different overflow check Running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer overflow sanitizer shows this report: [ 62.982337] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 62.985692] cgroup: Invalid name [ 62.986211] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../block/ioctl.c:36:46 [ 62.989370] 9pnet_fd: p9_fd_create_tcp (7343): problem connecting socket to 127.0.0.1 [ 62.992992] 9223372036854775807 + 4095 cannot be represented in type 'long long' [ 62.997827] 9pnet_fd: p9_fd_create_tcp (7345): problem connecting socket to 127.0.0.1 [ 62.999369] random: crng reseeded on system resumption [ 63.000634] GUP no longer grows the stack in syz-executor.2 (7353): 20002000-20003000 (20001000) [ 63.000668] CPU: 0 PID: 7353 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-00035-gb3ef86b5a957 #1 [ 63.000677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [ 63.000682] Call Trace: [ 63.000686] <TASK> [ 63.000731] dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0 [ 63.000919] __get_user_pages+0x903/0xd30 [ 63.001030] __gup_longterm_locked+0x153e/0x1ba0 [ 63.001041] ? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x17/0x50 [ 63.001072] ? try_get_folio+0x29c/0x2d0 [ 63.001083] internal_get_user_pages_fast+0x1119/0x1530 [ 63.001109] iov_iter_extract_pages+0x23b/0x580 [ 63.001206] bio_iov_iter_get_pages+0x4de/0x1220 [ 63.001235] iomap_dio_bio_iter+0x9b6/0x1410 [ 63.001297] __iomap_dio_rw+0xab4/0x1810 [ 63.001316] iomap_dio_rw+0x45/0xa0 [ 63.001328] ext4_file_write_iter+0xdde/0x1390 [ 63.001372] vfs_write+0x599/0xbd0 [ 63.001394] ksys_write+0xc8/0x190 [ 63.001403] do_syscall_64+0xd4/0x1b0 [ 63.001421] ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x3a/0x60 [ 63.001479] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 [ 63.001535] RIP: 0033:0x7f7fd3ebf539 [ 63.001551] Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 63.001562] RSP: 002b:00007f7fd32570c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 63.001584] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7fd3ff3f80 RCX: 00007f7fd3ebf539 [ 63.001590] RDX: 4db6d1e4f7e43360 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 63.001595] RBP: 00007f7fd3f1e496 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 63.001599] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 63.001604] R13: 0000000000000006 R14: 00007f7fd3ff3f80 R15: 00007ffd415ad2b8 ... [ 63.018142] ---[ end trace ]--- Historically, the signed integer overflow sanitizer did not work in the kernel due to its interaction with `-fwrapv` but this has since been changed [1] in the newest version of Clang; It was re-enabled in the kernel with Commit 557f8c582a9ba8ab ("ubsan: Reintroduce signed overflow sanitizer"). Let's rework this overflow checking logic to not actually perform an overflow during the check itself, thus avoiding the UBSAN splat. [1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block/ioctl: prefer different overflow check Running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer overflow sanitizer shows this report: [ 62.982337] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 62.985692] cgroup: Invalid name [ 62.986211] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../block/ioctl.c:36:46 [ 62.989370] 9pnet_fd: p9_fd_create_tcp (7343): problem connecting socket to 127.0.0.1 [ 62.992992] 9223372036854775807 + 4095 cannot be represented in type 'long long' [ 62.997827] 9pnet_fd: p9_fd_create_tcp (7345): problem connecting socket to 127.0.0.1 [ 62.999369] random: crng reseeded on system resumption [ 63.000634] GUP no longer grows the stack in syz-executor.2 (7353): 20002000-20003000 (20001000) [ 63.000668] CPU: 0 PID: 7353 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-00035-gb3ef86b5a957 #1 [ 63.000677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [ 63.000682] Call Trace: [ 63.000686] <TASK> [ 63.000731] dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0 [ 63.000919] __get_user_pages+0x903/0xd30 [ 63.001030] __gup_longterm_locked+0x153e/0x1ba0 [ 63.001041] ? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x17/0x50 [ 63.001072] ? try_get_folio+0x29c/0x2d0 [ 63.001083] internal_get_user_pages_fast+0x1119/0x1530 [ 63.001109] iov_iter_extract_pages+0x23b/0x580 [ 63.001206] bio_iov_iter_get_pages+0x4de/0x1220 [ 63.001235] iomap_dio_bio_iter+0x9b6/0x1410 [ 63.001297] __iomap_dio_rw+0xab4/0x1810 [ 63.001316] iomap_dio_rw+0x45/0xa0 [ 63.001328] ext4_file_write_iter+0xdde/0x1390 [ 63.001372] vfs_write+0x599/0xbd0 [ 63.001394] ksys_write+0xc8/0x190 [ 63.001403] do_syscall_64+0xd4/0x1b0 [ 63.001421] ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x3a/0x60 [ 63.001479] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 [ 63.001535] RIP: 0033:0x7f7fd3ebf539 [ 63.001551] Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 63.001562] RSP: 002b:00007f7fd32570c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 63.001584] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7fd3ff3f80 RCX: 00007f7fd3ebf539 [ 63.001590] RDX: 4db6d1e4f7e43360 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 63.001595] RBP: 00007f7fd3f1e496 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 63.001599] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 63.001604] R13: 0000000000000006 R14: 00007f7fd3ff3f80 R15: 00007ffd415ad2b8 ... [ 63.018142] ---[ end trace ]--- Historically, the signed integer overflow sanitizer did not work in the kernel due to its interaction with `-fwrapv` but this has since been changed [1] in the newest version of Clang; It was re-enabled in the kernel with Commit 557f8c582a9ba8ab ("ubsan: Reintroduce signed overflow sanitizer"). Let's rework this overflow checking logic to not actually perform an overflow during the check itself, thus avoiding the UBSAN splat. [1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1607Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240717Security Bulletin 17 Jul 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 Jul 2024, published on 17 July 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-40978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40993 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0870Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-37353 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38538 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42243 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0840Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38554 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0822Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0613Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40993 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Gestion détaillée du document le 19 juillet 2024 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gou

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-006323Linux の Linux Kernel における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Fixed
Linux: < 6.8, 5.10.221 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.162 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.96 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.36 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.9.7 ≤ 6.9.*, 6.10 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 12 Jul 2024 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:51 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-39349
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-41000 · cve.blacktree.nl