BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-40998High confidence

ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.27% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 14 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-40998 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()
64 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel's ext4 filesystem within the __ext4_fill_super() function, where uninitialized access to ratelimit_state->lock can occur, where the sysfs interface is registered before properly initializing rs->lock, potentially allowing other processes to modify rs->interval to a non-zero value.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-38792

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super() In the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock: ext4_fill_super ext4_register_sysfs // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms // Other processes modify rs->interval to // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms ext4_orphan_cleanup ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "Errors on filesystem, " __ext4_msg ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state) if (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0 return 1; raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags) raw_spin_trylock(lock) _raw_spin_trylock __raw_spin_trylock spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_) lock_acquire __lock_acquire register_lock_class assign_lock_key dump_stack(); ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10); raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock); // init rs->lock here and get the following dump_stack: ========================================================= INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504 [...] Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170 dump_stack+0x18/0x30 register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0 __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0 lock_acquire+0x120/0x450 _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0 ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220 __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4] ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4] __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4] ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4] [...] ========================================================= Normally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so ___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing rs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value via the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is uninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by accessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all initializations are complete to avoid such problems.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super() In the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock: ext4_fill_super ext4_register_sysfs // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms // Other processes modify rs->interval to // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms ext4_orphan_cleanup ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "Errors on filesystem, " __ext4_msg ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state) if (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0 return 1; raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags) raw_spin_trylock(lock) _raw_spin_trylock __raw_spin_trylock spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_) lock_acquire __lock_acquire register_lock_class assign_lock_key dump_stack(); ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10); raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock); // init rs->lock here and get the following dump_stack: ========================================================= INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504 [...] Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170 dump_stack+0x18/0x30 register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0 __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0 lock_acquire+0x120/0x450 _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0 ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220 __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4] ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4] __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4] ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4] [...] ========================================================= Normally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so ___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing rs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value via the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is uninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by accessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all initializations are complete to avoid such problems.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super() In the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock: ext4_fill_super ext4_register_sysfs // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms // Other processes modify rs->interval to // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms ext4_orphan_cleanup ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "Errors on filesystem, " __ext4_msg ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state) if (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0 return 1; raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags) raw_spin_trylock(lock) _raw_spin_trylock __raw_spin_trylock spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_) lock_acquire __lock_acquire register_lock_class assign_lock_key dump_stack(); ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10); raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock); // init rs->lock here and get the following dump_stack: ========================================================= INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504 [...] Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170 dump_stack+0x18/0x30 register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0 __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0 lock_acquire+0x120/0x450 _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0 ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220 __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4] ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4] __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4] ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4] [...] ========================================================= Normally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so ___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing rs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value via the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is uninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by accessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all initializations are complete to avoid such problems.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use of Uninitialized Resource → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-908 ↗

CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource. The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-908
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1607Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240717Security Bulletin 17 Jul 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 Jul 2024, published on 17 July 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-40974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-40900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41030 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-40900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41030 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0021Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-40954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0937Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0925Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0821Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-40960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-40981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-40981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0669Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-40948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028446Linux の Linux Kernel における初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 12 Jul 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:24 UTC · CWE-908 · Use of Uninitialized Resource

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-38792
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-40998 · cve.blacktree.nl