BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-40918High confidence

parisc: Try to fix random segmentation faults in package builds

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

13 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-38729

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: parisc: Try to fix random segmentation faults in package builds PA-RISC systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have had problems with random segmentation faults for many years. Systems with earlier processors are much more stable. Systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have a large L2 cache which needs per page flushing for decent performance when a large range is flushed. The combined cache in these systems is also more sensitive to non-equivalent aliases than the caches in earlier systems. The majority of random segmentation faults that I have looked at appear to be memory corruption in memory allocated using mmap and malloc. My first attempt at fixing the random faults didn't work. On reviewing the cache code, I realized that there were two issues which the existing code didn't handle correctly. Both relate to cache move-in. Another issue is that the present bit in PTEs is racy. 1) PA-RISC caches have a mind of their own and they can speculatively load data and instructions for a page as long as there is a entry in the TLB for the page which allows move-in. TLBs are local to each CPU. Thus, the TLB entry for a page must be purged before flushing the page. This is particularly important on SMP systems. In some of the flush routines, the flush routine would be called and then the TLB entry would be purged. This was because the flush routine needed the TLB entry to do the flush. 2) My initial approach to trying the fix the random faults was to try and use flush_cache_page_if_present for all flush operations. This actually made things worse and led to a couple of hardware lockups. It finally dawned on me that some lines weren't being flushed because the pte check code was racy. This resulted in random inequivalent mappings to physical pages. The __flush_cache_page tmpalias flush sets up its own TLB entry and it doesn't need the existing TLB entry. As long as we can find the pte pointer for the vm page, we can get the pfn and physical address of the page. We can also purge the TLB entry for the page before doing the flush. Further, __flush_cache_page uses a special TLB entry that inhibits cache move-in. When switching page mappings, we need to ensure that lines are removed from the cache. It is not sufficient to just flush the lines to memory as they may come back. This made it clear that we needed to implement all the required flush operations using tmpalias routines. This includes flushes for user and kernel pages. After modifying the code to use tmpalias flushes, it became clear that the random segmentation faults were not fully resolved. The frequency of faults was worse on systems with a 64 MB L2 (PA8900) and systems with more CPUs (rp4440). The warning that I added to flush_cache_page_if_present to detect pages that couldn't be flushed triggered frequently on some systems. Helge and I looked at the pages that couldn't be flushed and found that the PTE was either cleared or for a swap page. Ignoring pages that were swapped out seemed okay but pages with cleared PTEs seemed problematic. I looked at routines related to pte_clear and noticed ptep_clear_flush. The default implementation just flushes the TLB entry. However, it was obvious that on parisc we need to flush the cache page as well. If we don't flush the cache page, stale lines will be left in the cache and cause random corruption. Once a PTE is cleared, there is no way to find the physical address associated with the PTE and flush the associated page at a later time. I implemented an updated change with a parisc specific version of ptep_clear_flush. It fixed the random data corruption on Helge's rp4440 and rp3440, as well as on my c8000. At this point, I realized that I could restore the code where we only flush in flush_cache_page_if_present if the page has been accessed. However, for this, we also need to flush the cache when the accessed bit is cleared in ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: parisc: Try to fix random segmentation faults in package builds PA-RISC systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have had problems with random segmentation faults for many years. Systems with earlier processors are much more stable. Systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have a large L2 cache which needs per page flushing for decent performance when a large range is flushed. The combined cache in these systems is also more sensitive to non-equivalent aliases than the caches in earlier systems. The majority of random segmentation faults that I have looked at appear to be memory corruption in memory allocated using mmap and malloc. My first attempt at fixing the random faults didn't work. On reviewing the cache code, I realized that there were two issues which the existing code didn't handle correctly. Both relate to cache move-in. Another issue is that the present bit in PTEs is racy. 1) PA-RISC caches have a mind of their own and they can speculatively load data and instructions for a page as long as there is a entry in the TLB for the page which allows move-in. TLBs are local to each CPU. Thus, the TLB entry for a page must be purged before flushing the page. This is particularly important on SMP systems. In some of the flush routines, the flush routine would be called and then the TLB entry would be purged. This was because the flush routine needed the TLB entry to do the flush. 2) My initial approach to trying the fix the random faults was to try and use flush_cache_page_if_present for all flush operations. This actually made things worse and led to a couple of hardware lockups. It finally dawned on me that some lines weren't being flushed because the pte check code was racy. This resulted in random inequivalent mappings to physical pages. The __flush_cache_page tmpalias flush sets up its own TLB entry and it doesn't need the existing TLB entry. As long as we can find the pte pointer for the vm page, we can get the pfn and physical address of the page. We can also purge the TLB entry for the page before doing the flush. Further, __flush_cache_page uses a special TLB entry that inhibits cache move-in. When switching page mappings, we need to ensure that lines are removed from the cache. It is not sufficient to just flush the lines to memory as they may come back. This made it clear that we needed to implement all the required flush operations using tmpalias routines. This includes flushes for user and kernel pages. After modifying the code to use tmpalias flushes, it became clear that the random segmentation faults were not fully resolved. The frequency of faults was worse on systems with a 64 MB L2 (PA8900) and systems with more CPUs (rp4440). The warning that I added to flush_cache_page_if_present to detect pages that couldn't be flushed triggered frequently on some systems. Helge and I looked at the pages that couldn't be flushed and found that the PTE was either cleared or for a swap page. Ignoring pages that were swapped out seemed okay but pages with cleared PTEs seemed problematic. I looked at routines related to pte_clear and noticed ptep_clear_flush. The default implementation just flushes the TLB entry. However, it was obvious that on parisc we need to flush the cache page as well. If we don't flush the cache page, stale lines will be left in the cache and cause random corruption. Once a PTE is cleared, there is no way to find the physical address associated with the PTE and flush the associated page at a later time. I implemented an updated change with a parisc specific version of ptep_clear_flush. It fixed the random data corruption on Helge's rp4440 and rp3440, as well as on my c8000. At this point, I realized that I could restore the code where we only flush in flush_cache_page_if_present if the page has been accessed. However, for this, we also need to flush the cache when the accessed bit is cleared in ---truncated---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: parisc: Try to fix random segmentation faults in package builds PA-RISC systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have had problems with random segmentation faults for many years. Systems with earlier processors are much more stable. Systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have a large L2 cache which needs per page flushing for decent performance when a large range is flushed. The combined cache in these systems is also more sensitive to non-equivalent aliases than the caches in earlier systems. The majority of random segmentation faults that I have looked at appear to be memory corruption in memory allocated using mmap and malloc. My first attempt at fixing the random faults didn't work. On reviewing the cache code, I realized that there were two issues which the existing code didn't handle correctly. Both relate to cache move-in. Another issue is that the present bit in PTEs is racy. 1) PA-RISC caches have a mind of their own and they can speculatively load data and instructions for a page as long as there is a entry in the TLB for the page which allows move-in. TLBs are local to each CPU. Thus, the TLB entry for a page must be purged before flushing the page. This is particularly important on SMP systems. In some of the flush routines, the flush routine would be called and then the TLB entry would be purged. This was because the flush routine needed the TLB entry to do the flush. 2) My initial approach to trying the fix the random faults was to try and use flush_cache_page_if_present for all flush operations. This actually made things worse and led to a couple of hardware lockups. It finally dawned on me that some lines weren't being flushed because the pte check code was racy. This resulted in random inequivalent mappings to physical pages. The __flush_cache_page tmpalias flush sets up its own TLB entry and it doesn't need the existing TLB entry. As long as we can find the pte pointer for the vm page, we can get the pfn and physical address of the page. We can also purge the TLB entry for the page before doing the flush. Further, __flush_cache_page uses a special TLB entry that inhibits cache move-in. When switching page mappings, we need to ensure that lines are removed from the cache. It is not sufficient to just flush the lines to memory as they may come back. This made it clear that we needed to implement all the required flush operations using tmpalias routines. This includes flushes for user and kernel pages. After modifying the code to use tmpalias flushes, it became clear that the random segmentation faults were not fully resolved. The frequency of faults was worse on systems with a 64 MB L2 (PA8900) and systems with more CPUs (rp4440). The warning that I added to flush_cache_page_if_present to detect pages that couldn't be flushed triggered frequently on some systems. Helge and I looked at the pages that couldn't be flushed and found that the PTE was either cleared or for a swap page. Ignoring pages that were swapped out seemed okay but pages with cleared PTEs seemed problematic. I looked at routines related to pte_clear and noticed ptep_clear_flush. The default implementation just flushes the TLB entry. However, it was obvious that on parisc we need to flush the cache page as well. If we don't flush the cache page, stale lines will be left in the cache and cause random corruption. Once a PTE is cleared, there is no way to find the physical address associated with the PTE and flush the associated page at a later time. I implemented an updated change with a parisc specific version of ptep_clear_flush. It fixed the random data corruption on Helge's rp4440 and rp3440, as well as on my c8000. At this point, I realized that I could restore the code where we only flush in flush_cache_page_if_present if the page has been accessed. However, for this, we also need to flush the cache when the accessed bit is cleared in ---truncated---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-1607Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-40909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
2de8b4cc2051ee1d40eedbcf94de0e7d04507c37 < 5bf196f1936bf93df31112fbdfb78c03537c07b0; 2de8b4cc2051ee1d40eedbcf94de0e7d04507c37 < d66f2607d89f760cdffed88b22f309c895a2af20; 2de8b4cc2051ee1d40eedbcf94de0e7d04507c37 < 72d95924ee35c8cd16ef52f912483ee938a34d49; 5.18
Fixed
< 5.18; 6.6.35 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.9.6 ≤ 6.9.*; 6.10 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 12 Jul 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-38729
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-40918 · cve.blacktree.nl