BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-38636High confidence

f2fs: multidev: fix to recognize valid zero block address

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-37499

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: multidev: fix to recognize valid zero block address As reported by Yi Zhang in mailing list [1], kernel warning was catched during zbd/010 test as below: ./check zbd/010 zbd/010 (test gap zone support with F2FS) [failed] runtime ... 3.752s something found in dmesg: [ 4378.146781] run blktests zbd/010 at 2024-02-18 11:31:13 [ 4378.192349] null_blk: module loaded [ 4378.209860] null_blk: disk nullb0 created [ 4378.413285] scsi_debug:sdebug_driver_probe: scsi_debug: trim poll_queues to 0. poll_q/nr_hw = (0/1) [ 4378.422334] scsi host15: scsi_debug: version 0191 [20210520] dev_size_mb=1024, opts=0x0, submit_queues=1, statistics=0 [ 4378.434922] scsi 15:0:0:0: Direct-Access-ZBC Linux scsi_debug 0191 PQ: 0 ANSI: 7 [ 4378.443343] scsi 15:0:0:0: Power-on or device reset occurred [ 4378.449371] sd 15:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 20 [ 4378.449418] sd 15:0:0:0: [sdf] Host-managed zoned block device ... (See '/mnt/tests/gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/19168116/repository/archive.zip/storage/blktests/blk/blktests/results/nodev/zbd/010.dmesg' WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 44011 at fs/iomap/iter.c:51 CPU: 22 PID: 44011 Comm: fio Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3+ #1 RIP: 0010:iomap_iter+0x32b/0x350 Call Trace: <TASK> __iomap_dio_rw+0x1df/0x830 f2fs_file_read_iter+0x156/0x3d0 [f2fs] aio_read+0x138/0x210 io_submit_one+0x188/0x8c0 __x64_sys_io_submit+0x8c/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x86/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 Shinichiro Kawasaki helps to analyse this issue and proposes a potential fixing patch in [2]. Quoted from reply of Shinichiro Kawasaki: "I confirmed that the trigger commit is dbf8e63f48af as Yi reported. I took a look in the commit, but it looks fine to me. So I thought the cause is not in the commit diff. I found the WARN is printed when the f2fs is set up with multiple devices, and read requests are mapped to the very first block of the second device in the direct read path. In this case, f2fs_map_blocks() and f2fs_map_blocks_cached() modify map->m_pblk as the physical block address from each block device. It becomes zero when it is mapped to the first block of the device. However, f2fs_iomap_begin() assumes that map->m_pblk is the physical block address of the whole f2fs, across the all block devices. It compares map->m_pblk against NULL_ADDR == 0, then go into the unexpected branch and sets the invalid iomap->length. The WARN catches the invalid iomap->length. This WARN is printed even for non-zoned block devices, by following steps. - Create two (non-zoned) null_blk devices memory backed with 128MB size each: nullb0 and nullb1. # mkfs.f2fs /dev/nullb0 -c /dev/nullb1 # mount -t f2fs /dev/nullb0 "${mount_dir}" # dd if=/dev/zero of="${mount_dir}/test.dat" bs=1M count=192 # dd if="${mount_dir}/test.dat" of=/dev/null bs=1M count=192 iflag=direct ..." So, the root cause of this issue is: when multi-devices feature is on, f2fs_map_blocks() may return zero blkaddr in non-primary device, which is a verified valid block address, however, f2fs_iomap_begin() treats it as an invalid block address, and then it triggers the warning in iomap framework code. Finally, as discussed, we decide to use a more simple and direct way that checking (map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_MAPPED) condition instead of (map.m_pblk != NULL_ADDR) to fix this issue. Thanks a lot for the effort of Yi Zhang and Shinichiro Kawasaki on this issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/CAHj4cs-kfojYC9i0G73PRkYzcxCTex=-vugRFeP40g_URGvnfQ@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/gngdj77k4picagsfdtiaa7gpgnup6fsgwzsltx6milmhegmjff@iax2n4wvrqye/

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: multidev: fix to recognize valid zero block address As reported by Yi Zhang in mailing list [1], kernel warning was catched during zbd/010 test as below: ./check zbd/010 zbd/010 (test gap zone support with F2FS) [failed] runtime ... 3.752s something found in dmesg: [ 4378.146781] run blktests zbd/010 at 2024-02-18 11:31:13 [ 4378.192349] null_blk: module loaded [ 4378.209860] null_blk: disk nullb0 created [ 4378.413285] scsi_debug:sdebug_driver_probe: scsi_debug: trim poll_queues to 0. poll_q/nr_hw = (0/1) [ 4378.422334] scsi host15: scsi_debug: version 0191 [20210520] dev_size_mb=1024, opts=0x0, submit_queues=1, statistics=0 [ 4378.434922] scsi 15:0:0:0: Direct-Access-ZBC Linux scsi_debug 0191 PQ: 0 ANSI: 7 [ 4378.443343] scsi 15:0:0:0: Power-on or device reset occurred [ 4378.449371] sd 15:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 20 [ 4378.449418] sd 15:0:0:0: [sdf] Host-managed zoned block device ... (See '/mnt/tests/gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/19168116/repository/archive.zip/storage/blktests/blk/blktests/results/nodev/zbd/010.dmesg' WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 44011 at fs/iomap/iter.c:51 CPU: 22 PID: 44011 Comm: fio Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3+ #1 RIP: 0010:iomap_iter+0x32b/0x350 Call Trace: <TASK> __iomap_dio_rw+0x1df/0x830 f2fs_file_read_iter+0x156/0x3d0 [f2fs] aio_read+0x138/0x210 io_submit_one+0x188/0x8c0 __x64_sys_io_submit+0x8c/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x86/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 Shinichiro Kawasaki helps to analyse this issue and proposes a potential fixing patch in [2]. Quoted from reply of Shinichiro Kawasaki: "I confirmed that the trigger commit is dbf8e63f48af as Yi reported. I took a look in the commit, but it looks fine to me. So I thought the cause is not in the commit diff. I found the WARN is printed when the f2fs is set up with multiple devices, and read requests are mapped to the very first block of the second device in the direct read path. In this case, f2fs_map_blocks() and f2fs_map_blocks_cached() modify map->m_pblk as the physical block address from each block device. It becomes zero when it is mapped to the first block of the device. However, f2fs_iomap_begin() assumes that map->m_pblk is the physical block address of the whole f2fs, across the all block devices. It compares map->m_pblk against NULL_ADDR == 0, then go into the unexpected branch and sets the invalid iomap->length. The WARN catches the invalid iomap->length. This WARN is printed even for non-zoned block devices, by following steps. - Create two (non-zoned) null_blk devices memory backed with 128MB size each: nullb0 and nullb1. # mkfs.f2fs /dev/nullb0 -c /dev/nullb1 # mount -t f2fs /dev/nullb0 "${mount_dir}" # dd if=/dev/zero of="${mount_dir}/test.dat" bs=1M count=192 # dd if="${mount_dir}/test.dat" of=/dev/null bs=1M count=192 iflag=direct ..." So, the root cause of this issue is: when multi-devices feature is on, f2fs_map_blocks() may return zero blkaddr in non-primary device, which is a verified valid block address, however, f2fs_iomap_begin() treats it as an invalid block address, and then it triggers the warning in iomap framework code. Finally, as discussed, we decide to use a more simple and direct way that checking (map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_MAPPED) condition instead of (map.m_pblk != NULL_ADDR) to fix this issue. Thanks a lot for the effort of Yi Zhang and Shinichiro Kawasaki on this issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/CAHj4cs-kfojYC9i0G73PRkYzcxCTex=-vugRFeP40g_URGvnfQ@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/gngdj77k4picagsfdtiaa7gpgnup6fsgwzsltx6milmhegmjff@iax2n4wvrqye/

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: multidev: fix to recognize valid zero block address As reported by Yi Zhang in mailing list [1], kernel warning was catched during zbd/010 test as below: ./check zbd/010 zbd/010 (test gap zone support with F2FS) [failed] runtime ... 3.752s something found in dmesg: [ 4378.146781] run blktests zbd/010 at 2024-02-18 11:31:13 [ 4378.192349] null_blk: module loaded [ 4378.209860] null_blk: disk nullb0 created [ 4378.413285] scsi_debug:sdebug_driver_probe: scsi_debug: trim poll_queues to 0. poll_q/nr_hw = (0/1) [ 4378.422334] scsi host15: scsi_debug: version 0191 [20210520] dev_size_mb=1024, opts=0x0, submit_queues=1, statistics=0 [ 4378.434922] scsi 15:0:0:0: Direct-Access-ZBC Linux scsi_debug 0191 PQ: 0 ANSI: 7 [ 4378.443343] scsi 15:0:0:0: Power-on or device reset occurred [ 4378.449371] sd 15:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 20 [ 4378.449418] sd 15:0:0:0: [sdf] Host-managed zoned block device ... (See '/mnt/tests/gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/19168116/repository/archive.zip/storage/blktests/blk/blktests/results/nodev/zbd/010.dmesg' WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 44011 at fs/iomap/iter.c:51 CPU: 22 PID: 44011 Comm: fio Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3+ #1 RIP: 0010:iomap_iter+0x32b/0x350 Call Trace: <TASK> __iomap_dio_rw+0x1df/0x830 f2fs_file_read_iter+0x156/0x3d0 [f2fs] aio_read+0x138/0x210 io_submit_one+0x188/0x8c0 __x64_sys_io_submit+0x8c/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x86/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 Shinichiro Kawasaki helps to analyse this issue and proposes a potential fixing patch in [2]. Quoted from reply of Shinichiro Kawasaki: "I confirmed that the trigger commit is dbf8e63f48af as Yi reported. I took a look in the commit, but it looks fine to me. So I thought the cause is not in the commit diff. I found the WARN is printed when the f2fs is set up with multiple devices, and read requests are mapped to the very first block of the second device in the direct read path. In this case, f2fs_map_blocks() and f2fs_map_blocks_cached() modify map->m_pblk as the physical block address from each block device. It becomes zero when it is mapped to the first block of the device. However, f2fs_iomap_begin() assumes that map->m_pblk is the physical block address of the whole f2fs, across the all block devices. It compares map->m_pblk against NULL_ADDR == 0, then go into the unexpected branch and sets the invalid iomap->length. The WARN catches the invalid iomap->length. This WARN is printed even for non-zoned block devices, by following steps. - Create two (non-zoned) null_blk devices memory backed with 128MB size each: nullb0 and nullb1. # mkfs.f2fs /dev/nullb0 -c /dev/nullb1 # mount -t f2fs /dev/nullb0 "${mount_dir}" # dd if=/dev/zero of="${mount_dir}/test.dat" bs=1M count=192 # dd if="${mount_dir}/test.dat" of=/dev/null bs=1M count=192 iflag=direct ..." So, the root cause of this issue is: when multi-devices feature is on, f2fs_map_blocks() may return zero blkaddr in non-primary device, which is a verified valid block address, however, f2fs_iomap_begin() treats it as an invalid block address, and then it triggers the warning in iomap framework code. Finally, as discussed, we decide to use a more simple and direct way that checking (map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_MAPPED) condition instead of (map.m_pblk != NULL_ADDR) to fix this issue. Thanks a lot for the effort of Yi Zhang and Shinichiro Kawasaki on this issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/CAHj4cs-kfojYC9i0G73PRkYzcxCTex=-vugRFeP40g_URGvnfQ@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/gngdj77k4picagsfdtiaa7gpgnup6fsgwzsltx6milmhegmjff@iax2n4wvrqye/

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1422Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240626Security Bulletin 26 Jun 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 26 Jun 2024, published on 26 June 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38621 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38621 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38621 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028940Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 1517c1a7a4456f080fabc4ac9853930e4b880d14 < 1a9225fdd0ec95fcf32936bcea9ceef0cf1512dc, 1517c1a7a4456f080fabc4ac9853930e4b880d14 < 2b2611a42462c6c685d40b5f3aedcd8d21c27065, 1517c1a7a4456f080fabc4ac9853930e4b880d14 < e8b485e39b4d17afa9a2821fc778d5a67abfc03a, 1517c1a7a4456f080fabc4ac9853930e4b880d14 < 33e62cd7b4c281cd737c62e5d8c4f0e602a8c5c5, 5.17
Fixed
Linux: < 5.17, 6.1.93 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.33 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.9.4 ≤ 6.9.*, 6.10 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Jun 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:20 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-37499
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-38636 · cve.blacktree.nl