BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-38606High confidence

crypto: qat - validate slices count returned by FW

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-38606 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 66 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-38606
15 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - validate slices count returned by FW The function adf_send_admin_tl_start() enables the telemetry (TL) feature on a QAT device by sending the ICP_QAT_FW_TL_START message to the firmware. This triggers the FW to start writing TL data to a DMA buffer in memory and returns an array containing the number of accelerators of each type (slices) supported by this HW. The pointer to this array is stored in the adf_tl_hw_data data structure called slice_cnt. The array slice_cnt is then used in the function tl_print_dev_data() to report in debugfs only statistics about the supported accelerators. An incorrect value of the elements in slice_cnt might lead to an out of bounds memory read. At the moment, there isn't an implementation of FW that returns a wrong value, but for robustness validate the slice count array returned by FW.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-37469

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - validate slices count returned by FW The function adf_send_admin_tl_start() enables the telemetry (TL) feature on a QAT device by sending the ICP_QAT_FW_TL_START message to the firmware. This triggers the FW to start writing TL data to a DMA buffer in memory and returns an array containing the number of accelerators of each type (slices) supported by this HW. The pointer to this array is stored in the adf_tl_hw_data data structure called slice_cnt. The array slice_cnt is then used in the function tl_print_dev_data() to report in debugfs only statistics about the supported accelerators. An incorrect value of the elements in slice_cnt might lead to an out of bounds memory read. At the moment, there isn't an implementation of FW that returns a wrong value, but for robustness validate the slice count array returned by FW.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - validate slices count returned by FW The function adf_send_admin_tl_start() enables the telemetry (TL) feature on a QAT device by sending the ICP_QAT_FW_TL_START message to the firmware. This triggers the FW to start writing TL data to a DMA buffer in memory and returns an array containing the number of accelerators of each type (slices) supported by this HW. The pointer to this array is stored in the adf_tl_hw_data data structure called slice_cnt. The array slice_cnt is then used in the function tl_print_dev_data() to report in debugfs only statistics about the supported accelerators. An incorrect value of the elements in slice_cnt might lead to an out of bounds memory read. At the moment, there isn't an implementation of FW that returns a wrong value, but for robustness validate the slice count array returned by FW.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - validate slices count returned by FW The function adf_send_admin_tl_start() enables the telemetry (TL) feature on a QAT device by sending the ICP_QAT_FW_TL_START message to the firmware. This triggers the FW to start writing TL data to a DMA buffer in memory and returns an array containing the number of accelerators of each type (slices) supported by this HW. The pointer to this array is stored in the adf_tl_hw_data data structure called slice_cnt. The array slice_cnt is then used in the function tl_print_dev_data() to report in debugfs only statistics about the supported accelerators. An incorrect value of the elements in slice_cnt might lead to an out of bounds memory read. At the moment, there isn't an implementation of FW that returns a wrong value, but for robustness validate the slice count array returned by FW.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1418Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240626Security Bulletin 26 Jun 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 26 Jun 2024, published on 26 June 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-36967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37370 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37371 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38561 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39486 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46751 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46752 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41149 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41149 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0694Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-38597 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-38597 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-020303Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.8, 6.8.12 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9.3 ≤ 6.9.*, 6.10 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jun 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-37469
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-38606 · cve.blacktree.nl