BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-38557High confidence

net/mlx5: Reload only IB representors upon lag disable/enable

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 14 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-37420

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Reload only IB representors upon lag disable/enable On lag disable, the bond IB device along with all of its representors are destroyed, and then the slaves' representors get reloaded. In case the slave IB representor load fails, the eswitch error flow unloads all representors, including ethernet representors, where the netdevs get detached and removed from lag bond. Such flow is inaccurate as the lag driver is not responsible for loading/unloading ethernet representors. Furthermore, the flow described above begins by holding lag lock to prevent bond changes during disable flow. However, when reaching the ethernet representors detachment from lag, the lag lock is required again, triggering the following deadlock: Call trace: __switch_to+0xf4/0x148 __schedule+0x2c8/0x7d0 schedule+0x50/0xe0 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x18/0x28 __mutex_lock.isra.13+0x2b8/0x570 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1c/0x28 mutex_lock+0x4c/0x68 mlx5_lag_remove_netdev+0x3c/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_uplink_rep_disable+0x70/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_detach_netdev+0x6c/0xb0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_netdev_change_profile+0x44/0x138 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_netdev_attach_nic_profile+0x28/0x38 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_vport_rep_unload+0x184/0x1b8 [mlx5_core] mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_load+0xd8/0xe0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_eswitch_reload_reps+0x74/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_disable_lag+0x130/0x138 [mlx5_core] mlx5_lag_disable_change+0x6c/0x70 [mlx5_core] // hold ldev->lock mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set+0xc0/0x410 [mlx5_core] devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit+0xdc/0x180 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.17+0xe8/0x138 genl_rcv_msg+0xe4/0x220 netlink_rcv_skb+0x44/0x108 genl_rcv+0x40/0x58 netlink_unicast+0x198/0x268 netlink_sendmsg+0x1d4/0x418 sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x60 __sys_sendto+0xf4/0x120 __arm64_sys_sendto+0x30/0x40 el0_svc_common+0x8c/0x120 do_el0_svc+0x30/0xa0 el0_svc+0x20/0x30 el0_sync_handler+0x90/0xb8 el0_sync+0x160/0x180 Thus, upon lag enable/disable, load and unload only the IB representors of the slaves preventing the deadlock mentioned above. While at it, refactor the mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_load() function to have a static helper method for its internal logic, in symmetry with the representor unload design.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Reload only IB representors upon lag disable/enable On lag disable, the bond IB device along with all of its representors are destroyed, and then the slaves' representors get reloaded. In case the slave IB representor load fails, the eswitch error flow unloads all representors, including ethernet representors, where the netdevs get detached and removed from lag bond. Such flow is inaccurate as the lag driver is not responsible for loading/unloading ethernet representors. Furthermore, the flow described above begins by holding lag lock to prevent bond changes during disable flow. However, when reaching the ethernet representors detachment from lag, the lag lock is required again, triggering the following deadlock: Call trace: __switch_to+0xf4/0x148 __schedule+0x2c8/0x7d0 schedule+0x50/0xe0 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x18/0x28 __mutex_lock.isra.13+0x2b8/0x570 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1c/0x28 mutex_lock+0x4c/0x68 mlx5_lag_remove_netdev+0x3c/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_uplink_rep_disable+0x70/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_detach_netdev+0x6c/0xb0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_netdev_change_profile+0x44/0x138 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_netdev_attach_nic_profile+0x28/0x38 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_vport_rep_unload+0x184/0x1b8 [mlx5_core] mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_load+0xd8/0xe0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_eswitch_reload_reps+0x74/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_disable_lag+0x130/0x138 [mlx5_core] mlx5_lag_disable_change+0x6c/0x70 [mlx5_core] // hold ldev->lock mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set+0xc0/0x410 [mlx5_core] devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit+0xdc/0x180 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.17+0xe8/0x138 genl_rcv_msg+0xe4/0x220 netlink_rcv_skb+0x44/0x108 genl_rcv+0x40/0x58 netlink_unicast+0x198/0x268 netlink_sendmsg+0x1d4/0x418 sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x60 __sys_sendto+0xf4/0x120 __arm64_sys_sendto+0x30/0x40 el0_svc_common+0x8c/0x120 do_el0_svc+0x30/0xa0 el0_svc+0x20/0x30 el0_sync_handler+0x90/0xb8 el0_sync+0x160/0x180 Thus, upon lag enable/disable, load and unload only the IB representors of the slaves preventing the deadlock mentioned above. While at it, refactor the mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_load() function to have a static helper method for its internal logic, in symmetry with the representor unload design.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Reload only IB representors upon lag disable/enable On lag disable, the bond IB device along with all of its representors are destroyed, and then the slaves' representors get reloaded. In case the slave IB representor load fails, the eswitch error flow unloads all representors, including ethernet representors, where the netdevs get detached and removed from lag bond. Such flow is inaccurate as the lag driver is not responsible for loading/unloading ethernet representors. Furthermore, the flow described above begins by holding lag lock to prevent bond changes during disable flow. However, when reaching the ethernet representors detachment from lag, the lag lock is required again, triggering the following deadlock: Call trace: __switch_to+0xf4/0x148 __schedule+0x2c8/0x7d0 schedule+0x50/0xe0 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x18/0x28 __mutex_lock.isra.13+0x2b8/0x570 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1c/0x28 mutex_lock+0x4c/0x68 mlx5_lag_remove_netdev+0x3c/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_uplink_rep_disable+0x70/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_detach_netdev+0x6c/0xb0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_netdev_change_profile+0x44/0x138 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_netdev_attach_nic_profile+0x28/0x38 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_vport_rep_unload+0x184/0x1b8 [mlx5_core] mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_load+0xd8/0xe0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_eswitch_reload_reps+0x74/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_disable_lag+0x130/0x138 [mlx5_core] mlx5_lag_disable_change+0x6c/0x70 [mlx5_core] // hold ldev->lock mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set+0xc0/0x410 [mlx5_core] devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit+0xdc/0x180 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.17+0xe8/0x138 genl_rcv_msg+0xe4/0x220 netlink_rcv_skb+0x44/0x108 genl_rcv+0x40/0x58 netlink_unicast+0x198/0x268 netlink_sendmsg+0x1d4/0x418 sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x60 __sys_sendto+0xf4/0x120 __arm64_sys_sendto+0x30/0x40 el0_svc_common+0x8c/0x120 do_el0_svc+0x30/0xa0 el0_svc+0x20/0x30 el0_sync_handler+0x90/0xb8 el0_sync+0x160/0x180 Thus, upon lag enable/disable, load and unload only the IB representors of the slaves preventing the deadlock mentioned above. While at it, refactor the mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_load() function to have a static helper method for its internal logic, in symmetry with the representor unload design.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1418Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240626Security Bulletin 26 Jun 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 26 Jun 2024, published on 26 June 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-36951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-36951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38548 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0694Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-38548 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38561 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38563 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38548 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-38548 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38561 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38563 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38548 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0578Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38546 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-006933Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 598fe77df855feeeca9dfda2ffe622ac7724e5c3 < e93fc8d959e56092e2eca1e5511c2d2f0ad6807a, 598fe77df855feeeca9dfda2ffe622ac7724e5c3 < f03c714a0fdd1f93101a929d0e727c28a66383fc, 598fe77df855feeeca9dfda2ffe622ac7724e5c3 < 0f320f28f54b1b269a755be2e3fb3695e0b80b07, 598fe77df855feeeca9dfda2ffe622ac7724e5c3 < 0f06228d4a2dcc1fca5b3ddb0eefa09c05b102c4, 5.15
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 6.6.33 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.12 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9.3 ≤ 6.9.*, 6.10 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jun 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:18 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-37420
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-38557 · cve.blacktree.nl