BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-36972High confidence

af_unix: Update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb under sk_receive_queue lock.

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.52% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-36322

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb under sk_receive_queue lock. Billy Jheng Bing-Jhong reported a race between __unix_gc() and queue_oob(). __unix_gc() tries to garbage-collect close()d inflight sockets, and then if the socket has MSG_OOB in unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb, GC will drop the reference and set NULL to it locklessly. However, the peer socket still can send MSG_OOB message and queue_oob() can update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb concurrently, leading NULL pointer dereference. [0] To fix the issue, let's update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb under the sk_receive_queue's lock and take it everywhere we touch oob_skb. Note that we defer kfree_skb() in manage_oob() to silence lockdep false-positive (See [1]). [0]: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 8000000009f5e067 P4D 8000000009f5e067 PUD 9f5d067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00191-gd091e579b864 #110 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events delayed_fput RIP: 0010:skb_dequeue (./include/linux/skbuff.h:2386 ./include/linux/skbuff.h:2402 net/core/skbuff.c:3847) Code: 39 e3 74 3e 8b 43 10 48 89 ef 83 e8 01 89 43 10 49 8b 44 24 08 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00 00 00 49 8b 14 24 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 <48> 89 42 08 48 89 10 e8 e7 c5 42 00 4c 89 e0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 cc cc RSP: 0018:ffffc900001bfd48 EFLAGS: 00000002 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880088f5ae8 RCX: 00000000361289f9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000206 RDI: ffff8880088f5b00 RBP: ffff8880088f5b00 R08: 0000000000080000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8880056b6a00 R13: ffff8880088f5280 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff8880088f5a80 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88807dd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000006314000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> unix_release_sock (net/unix/af_unix.c:654) unix_release (net/unix/af_unix.c:1050) __sock_release (net/socket.c:660) sock_close (net/socket.c:1423) __fput (fs/file_table.c:423) delayed_fput (fs/file_table.c:444 (discriminator 3)) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue.c:3416) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:388) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153) ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:257) </TASK> Modules linked in: CR2: 0000000000000008

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb under sk_receive_queue lock. Billy Jheng Bing-Jhong reported a race between __unix_gc() and queue_oob(). __unix_gc() tries to garbage-collect close()d inflight sockets, and then if the socket has MSG_OOB in unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb, GC will drop the reference and set NULL to it locklessly. However, the peer socket still can send MSG_OOB message and queue_oob() can update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb concurrently, leading NULL pointer dereference. [0] To fix the issue, let's update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb under the sk_receive_queue's lock and take it everywhere we touch oob_skb. Note that we defer kfree_skb() in manage_oob() to silence lockdep false-positive (See [1]). [0]: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 8000000009f5e067 P4D 8000000009f5e067 PUD 9f5d067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00191-gd091e579b864 #110 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events delayed_fput RIP: 0010:skb_dequeue (./include/linux/skbuff.h:2386 ./include/linux/skbuff.h:2402 net/core/skbuff.c:3847) Code: 39 e3 74 3e 8b 43 10 48 89 ef 83 e8 01 89 43 10 49 8b 44 24 08 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00 00 00 49 8b 14 24 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 <48> 89 42 08 48 89 10 e8 e7 c5 42 00 4c 89 e0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 cc cc RSP: 0018:ffffc900001bfd48 EFLAGS: 00000002 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880088f5ae8 RCX: 00000000361289f9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000206 RDI: ffff8880088f5b00 RBP: ffff8880088f5b00 R08: 0000000000080000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8880056b6a00 R13: ffff8880088f5280 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff8880088f5a80 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88807dd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000006314000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> unix_release_sock (net/unix/af_unix.c:654) unix_release (net/unix/af_unix.c:1050) __sock_release (net/socket.c:660) sock_close (net/socket.c:1423) __fput (fs/file_table.c:423) delayed_fput (fs/file_table.c:444 (discriminator 3)) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue.c:3416) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:388) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153) ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:257) </TASK> Modules linked in: CR2: 0000000000000008

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb under sk_receive_queue lock. Billy Jheng Bing-Jhong reported a race between __unix_gc() and queue_oob(). __unix_gc() tries to garbage-collect close()d inflight sockets, and then if the socket has MSG_OOB in unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb, GC will drop the reference and set NULL to it locklessly. However, the peer socket still can send MSG_OOB message and queue_oob() can update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb concurrently, leading NULL pointer dereference. [0] To fix the issue, let's update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb under the sk_receive_queue's lock and take it everywhere we touch oob_skb. Note that we defer kfree_skb() in manage_oob() to silence lockdep false-positive (See [1]). [0]: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 8000000009f5e067 P4D 8000000009f5e067 PUD 9f5d067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-00191-gd091e579b864 #110 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events delayed_fput RIP: 0010:skb_dequeue (./include/linux/skbuff.h:2386 ./include/linux/skbuff.h:2402 net/core/skbuff.c:3847) Code: 39 e3 74 3e 8b 43 10 48 89 ef 83 e8 01 89 43 10 49 8b 44 24 08 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00 00 00 49 8b 14 24 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 <48> 89 42 08 48 89 10 e8 e7 c5 42 00 4c 89 e0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 cc cc RSP: 0018:ffffc900001bfd48 EFLAGS: 00000002 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880088f5ae8 RCX: 00000000361289f9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000206 RDI: ffff8880088f5b00 RBP: ffff8880088f5b00 R08: 0000000000080000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8880056b6a00 R13: ffff8880088f5280 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff8880088f5a80 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88807dd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000006314000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> unix_release_sock (net/unix/af_unix.c:654) unix_release (net/unix/af_unix.c:1050) __sock_release (net/socket.c:660) sock_close (net/socket.c:1423) __fput (fs/file_table.c:423) delayed_fput (fs/file_table.c:444 (discriminator 3)) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue.c:3416) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:388) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153) ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:257) </TASK> Modules linked in: CR2: 0000000000000008

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-2045Android Patchday September: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Google Android ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1322Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifische Angriffe

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240612Security Bulletin 12 Jun 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 12 Jun 2024, published on 12 June 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36028 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36348 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36349 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36350 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36357 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42265 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36288 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36477 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0733Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Google

ord?id=CVE-2024-33045 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33048 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33050 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33060 Référence CVE CVE-2024-3655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3655 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39432 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40652 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40654 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40655 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-36957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-36957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-36952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37353 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-021482Linux の Linux Kernel における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0358Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Google Android en Samsung Mobile

Een kwaadwillende kan de kwetsbaarheden misbruiken om zich verhoogde rechten toe te kennen op het device en zo willekeurige code uit te voeren, mogelijk met rechten van het systeem en toegang krijgen tot gevoelige gegevens. Voor succesvol misbruik moet de kwaadwillende het slachtoffer misleiden een malafide app te installeren en draaien of een malafide link te volgen. In deze update wordt ook de kwetsbaarheid met kenmerk CVE-2024-32896 verholpen. Deze bevindt zich in het Android Framework en stelt een lokale kwaadwillende in staat om zich verhoogde rechten toe te kennen en code uit te voeren met rechten van het systeem. Van deze kwetsbaarheid meldt Google dat deze zeer beperkt en gericht is misbruikt als ZeroDay op Google Pixel. Er is (nog) geen publieke Proof-of-Concept of exploit beschikbaar. In deze update zijn ook kwetsbaarheden verholpen in closed-source componenten van Arm, Imagination Technologies, Unisoc en Qualcomm. Google heeft verder weinig inhoudelijke informatie bekend gesteld.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 4fe505c63aa3273135a57597fda761e9aecc7668 < 518a994aa0b87d96f1bc6678a7035df5d1fcd7a1, e0e09186d8821ad59806115d347ea32efa43ca4b < 4bf6964451c3cb411fbaa1ae8b214b3d97a59bf1, b74aa9ce13d02b7fd37c5325b99854f91b9b4276 < d59ae9314b97e01c76a4171472441e55721ba636, 1279f9d9dec2d7462823a18c29ad61359e0a007d < 4708f49add84a57ce0ccc7bf9a6269845c631cc3, 1279f9d9dec2d7462823a18c29ad61359e0a007d < 9841991a446c87f90f66f4b9fee6fe934c1336a2, 82ae47c5c3a6b27fdc0f9e83c1499cb439c56140, 5.15.149 < 5.15.161, 6.1.78 < 6.1.93, 6.6.17 < 6.6.33, 6.7.5 < 6.8, 6.8
Fixed
Linux: < 6.8, 5.15.161 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.93 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.33 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.9.4 ≤ 6.9.*, 6.10 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Jun 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-36322
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-36972 · cve.blacktree.nl