BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-36905High confidence

tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-265688 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 12 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.33% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-613116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-613116: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.1
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets.
Remediation
Update to V3.1 or later version
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-36365

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets TCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by cross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers. In the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide by zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust() A socket makes the following state transitions, without ever calling tcp_init_transfer(), meaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called. TCP_CLOSE connect() TCP_SYN_SENT TCP_SYN_RECV shutdown() -> tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN) TCP_FIN_WAIT1 To fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not perform a TCP_SYN_RECV -> TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition, which makes no sense anyway. When tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state from TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at sk->sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state, and send a FIN packet from a sane socket state. This means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH context, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations. [1] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767 Code: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 <48> f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da FS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513 tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578 inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068 ____sys_recvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803 ___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline] do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets TCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by cross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers. In the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide by zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust() A socket makes the following state transitions, without ever calling tcp_init_transfer(), meaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called. TCP_CLOSE connect() TCP_SYN_SENT TCP_SYN_RECV shutdown() -> tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN) TCP_FIN_WAIT1 To fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not perform a TCP_SYN_RECV -> TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition, which makes no sense anyway. When tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state from TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at sk->sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state, and send a FIN packet from a sane socket state. This means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH context, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations. [1] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767 Code: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 <48> f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da FS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513 tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578 inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068 ____sys_recvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803 ___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline] do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001

Why

The product divides a value by zero.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets TCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by cross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers. In the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide by zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust() A socket makes the following state transitions, without ever calling tcp_init_transfer(), meaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called. TCP_CLOSE connect() TCP_SYN_SENT TCP_SYN_RECV shutdown() -> tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN) TCP_FIN_WAIT1 To fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not perform a TCP_SYN_RECV -> TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition, which makes no sense anyway. When tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state from TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at sk->sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state, and send a FIN packet from a sane socket state. This means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH context, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations. [1] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767 Code: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 <48> f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da FS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513 tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578 inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068 ____sys_recvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803 ___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline] do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001

Why

The product divides a value by zero.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Divide By Zero → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-369 ↗

CWE-369: Divide By Zero. The product divides a value by zero.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-369
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1293IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Informationen auszuspähen, einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen oder weitere unspezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1913Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0612IBM Security Guardium: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Security Guardium ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsbeschränkungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, beliebigen Code auszuführen und vertrauliche Informationen preiszugeben.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1259Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifischen Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240605Security Bulletin 05 Jun 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 05 Jun 2024, published on 5 June 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0024Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2023-6270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38538 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41082 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36031 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38576 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2024-36025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-3651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0716Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0694Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-36020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0527Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-36020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36031 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0472Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-35848 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36031 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-029990Debian等の複数ベンダの製品におけるゼロ除算に関する脆弱性

LinuxカーネルにおけるTCPソケット管理の脆弱性が修正されました。本脆弱性は、TCP_SYN_RECV状態のソケットに対して誤ったシャットダウン処理(SEND_SHUTDOWN)が遅延されることで発生し、この状態のソケットが正常に初期化されないまま状態遷移し、最終的にゼロ除算によるクラッシュが引き起こされます。この問題は、tcp_shutdown()関数がTCP_SYN_RECVからTCP_FIN_WAIT1への不適切な状態遷移を行わないように修正することで解決しました。修正により、ソケットの状態管理が適切に行われ、攻撃者によるサービス拒否(DoS)攻撃のリスクが軽減されます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.12, 4.19.314 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.276 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.217 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.159 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.91 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.31 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.10 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 30 May 2024 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 11:54 UTC · CWE-369 · Divide By Zero

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-36365
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-36905 · cve.blacktree.nl