BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-35971High confidence

net: ks8851: Handle softirqs at the end of IRQ thread to fix hang

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.69% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.90-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35689

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ks8851: Handle softirqs at the end of IRQ thread to fix hang The ks8851_irq() thread may call ks8851_rx_pkts() in case there are any packets in the MAC FIFO, which calls netif_rx(). This netif_rx() implementation is guarded by local_bh_disable() and local_bh_enable(). The local_bh_enable() may call do_softirq() to run softirqs in case any are pending. One of the softirqs is net_rx_action, which ultimately reaches the driver .start_xmit callback. If that happens, the system hangs. The entire call chain is below: ks8851_start_xmit_par from netdev_start_xmit netdev_start_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit __dev_queue_xmit from __neigh_update __neigh_update from neigh_update neigh_update from arp_process.constprop.0 arp_process.constprop.0 from __netif_receive_skb_one_core __netif_receive_skb_one_core from process_backlog process_backlog from __napi_poll.constprop.0 __napi_poll.constprop.0 from net_rx_action net_rx_action from __do_softirq __do_softirq from call_with_stack call_with_stack from do_softirq do_softirq from __local_bh_enable_ip __local_bh_enable_ip from netif_rx netif_rx from ks8851_irq ks8851_irq from irq_thread_fn irq_thread_fn from irq_thread irq_thread from kthread kthread from ret_from_fork The hang happens because ks8851_irq() first locks a spinlock in ks8851_par.c ks8851_lock_par() spin_lock_irqsave(&ksp->lock, ...) and with that spinlock locked, calls netif_rx(). Once the execution reaches ks8851_start_xmit_par(), it calls ks8851_lock_par() again which attempts to claim the already locked spinlock again, and the hang happens. Move the do_softirq() call outside of the spinlock protected section of ks8851_irq() by disabling BHs around the entire spinlock protected section of ks8851_irq() handler. Place local_bh_enable() outside of the spinlock protected section, so that it can trigger do_softirq() without the ks8851_par.c ks8851_lock_par() spinlock being held, and safely call ks8851_start_xmit_par() without attempting to lock the already locked spinlock. Since ks8851_irq() is protected by local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() now, replace netif_rx() with __netif_rx() which is not duplicating the local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() calls.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ks8851: Handle softirqs at the end of IRQ thread to fix hang The ks8851_irq() thread may call ks8851_rx_pkts() in case there are any packets in the MAC FIFO, which calls netif_rx(). This netif_rx() implementation is guarded by local_bh_disable() and local_bh_enable(). The local_bh_enable() may call do_softirq() to run softirqs in case any are pending. One of the softirqs is net_rx_action, which ultimately reaches the driver .start_xmit callback. If that happens, the system hangs. The entire call chain is below: ks8851_start_xmit_par from netdev_start_xmit netdev_start_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit __dev_queue_xmit from __neigh_update __neigh_update from neigh_update neigh_update from arp_process.constprop.0 arp_process.constprop.0 from __netif_receive_skb_one_core __netif_receive_skb_one_core from process_backlog process_backlog from __napi_poll.constprop.0 __napi_poll.constprop.0 from net_rx_action net_rx_action from __do_softirq __do_softirq from call_with_stack call_with_stack from do_softirq do_softirq from __local_bh_enable_ip __local_bh_enable_ip from netif_rx netif_rx from ks8851_irq ks8851_irq from irq_thread_fn irq_thread_fn from irq_thread irq_thread from kthread kthread from ret_from_fork The hang happens because ks8851_irq() first locks a spinlock in ks8851_par.c ks8851_lock_par() spin_lock_irqsave(&ksp->lock, ...) and with that spinlock locked, calls netif_rx(). Once the execution reaches ks8851_start_xmit_par(), it calls ks8851_lock_par() again which attempts to claim the already locked spinlock again, and the hang happens. Move the do_softirq() call outside of the spinlock protected section of ks8851_irq() by disabling BHs around the entire spinlock protected section of ks8851_irq() handler. Place local_bh_enable() outside of the spinlock protected section, so that it can trigger do_softirq() without the ks8851_par.c ks8851_lock_par() spinlock being held, and safely call ks8851_start_xmit_par() without attempting to lock the already locked spinlock. Since ks8851_irq() is protected by local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() now, replace netif_rx() with __netif_rx() which is not duplicating the local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() calls.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ks8851: Handle softirqs at the end of IRQ thread to fix hang The ks8851_irq() thread may call ks8851_rx_pkts() in case there are any packets in the MAC FIFO, which calls netif_rx(). This netif_rx() implementation is guarded by local_bh_disable() and local_bh_enable(). The local_bh_enable() may call do_softirq() to run softirqs in case any are pending. One of the softirqs is net_rx_action, which ultimately reaches the driver .start_xmit callback. If that happens, the system hangs. The entire call chain is below: ks8851_start_xmit_par from netdev_start_xmit netdev_start_xmit from dev_hard_start_xmit dev_hard_start_xmit from sch_direct_xmit sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit __dev_queue_xmit from __neigh_update __neigh_update from neigh_update neigh_update from arp_process.constprop.0 arp_process.constprop.0 from __netif_receive_skb_one_core __netif_receive_skb_one_core from process_backlog process_backlog from __napi_poll.constprop.0 __napi_poll.constprop.0 from net_rx_action net_rx_action from __do_softirq __do_softirq from call_with_stack call_with_stack from do_softirq do_softirq from __local_bh_enable_ip __local_bh_enable_ip from netif_rx netif_rx from ks8851_irq ks8851_irq from irq_thread_fn irq_thread_fn from irq_thread irq_thread from kthread kthread from ret_from_fork The hang happens because ks8851_irq() first locks a spinlock in ks8851_par.c ks8851_lock_par() spin_lock_irqsave(&ksp->lock, ...) and with that spinlock locked, calls netif_rx(). Once the execution reaches ks8851_start_xmit_par(), it calls ks8851_lock_par() again which attempts to claim the already locked spinlock again, and the hang happens. Move the do_softirq() call outside of the spinlock protected section of ks8851_irq() by disabling BHs around the entire spinlock protected section of ks8851_irq() handler. Place local_bh_enable() outside of the spinlock protected section, so that it can trigger do_softirq() without the ks8851_par.c ks8851_lock_par() spinlock being held, and safely call ks8851_start_xmit_par() without attempting to lock the already locked spinlock. Since ks8851_irq() is protected by local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() now, replace netif_rx() with __netif_rx() which is not duplicating the local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() calls.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0840Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27024 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-31076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028208Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 797047f875b5463719cc70ba213eb691d453c946 < 492337a4fbd1421b42df684ee9b34be2a2722540, 797047f875b5463719cc70ba213eb691d453c946 < cba376eb036c2c20077b41d47b317d8218fe754f, 797047f875b5463719cc70ba213eb691d453c946 < 49d5d70538b6b8f2a3f8f1ac30c1f921d4a0929b, 797047f875b5463719cc70ba213eb691d453c946 < be0384bf599cf1eb8d337517feeb732d71f75a6f, 5.8
Fixed
Linux: < 5.8, 6.1.87 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.28 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.7 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 May 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35689
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-35971 · cve.blacktree.nl