BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-35970High confidence

af_unix: Clear stale u->oob_skb.

Linux · Linux

6.3MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

13 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35688

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Clear stale u->oob_skb. syzkaller started to report deadlock of unix_gc_lock after commit 4090fa373f0e ("af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm."), but it just uncovers the bug that has been there since commit 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support"). The repro basically does the following. from socket import * from array import array c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM) c1.sendmsg([b'a'], [(SOL_SOCKET, SCM_RIGHTS, array("i", [c2.fileno()]))], MSG_OOB) c2.recv(1) # blocked as no normal data in recv queue c2.close() # done async and unblock recv() c1.close() # done async and trigger GC A socket sends its file descriptor to itself as OOB data and tries to receive normal data, but finally recv() fails due to async close(). The problem here is wrong handling of OOB skb in manage_oob(). When recvmsg() is called without MSG_OOB, manage_oob() is called to check if the peeked skb is OOB skb. In such a case, manage_oob() pops it out of the receive queue but does not clear unix_sock(sk)->oob_skb. This is wrong in terms of uAPI. Let's say we send "hello" with MSG_OOB, and "world" without MSG_OOB. The 'o' is handled as OOB data. When recv() is called twice without MSG_OOB, the OOB data should be lost. >>> from socket import * >>> c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) >>> c1.send(b'hello', MSG_OOB) # 'o' is OOB data 5 >>> c1.send(b'world') 5 >>> c2.recv(5) # OOB data is not received b'hell' >>> c2.recv(5) # OOB date is skipped b'world' >>> c2.recv(5, MSG_OOB) # This should return an error b'o' In the same situation, TCP actually returns -EINVAL for the last recv(). Also, if we do not clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb, unix_poll() always set EPOLLPRI even though the data has passed through by previous recv(). To avoid these issues, we must clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb when dequeuing it from recv queue. The reason why the old GC did not trigger the deadlock is because the old GC relied on the receive queue to detect the loop. When it is triggered, the socket with OOB data is marked as GC candidate because file refcount == inflight count (1). However, after traversing all inflight sockets, the socket still has a positive inflight count (1), thus the socket is excluded from candidates. Then, the old GC lose the chance to garbage-collect the socket. With the old GC, the repro continues to create true garbage that will never be freed nor detected by kmemleak as it's linked to the global inflight list. That's why we couldn't even notice the issue.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Clear stale u->oob_skb. syzkaller started to report deadlock of unix_gc_lock after commit 4090fa373f0e ("af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm."), but it just uncovers the bug that has been there since commit 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support"). The repro basically does the following. from socket import * from array import array c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM) c1.sendmsg([b'a'], [(SOL_SOCKET, SCM_RIGHTS, array("i", [c2.fileno()]))], MSG_OOB) c2.recv(1) # blocked as no normal data in recv queue c2.close() # done async and unblock recv() c1.close() # done async and trigger GC A socket sends its file descriptor to itself as OOB data and tries to receive normal data, but finally recv() fails due to async close(). The problem here is wrong handling of OOB skb in manage_oob(). When recvmsg() is called without MSG_OOB, manage_oob() is called to check if the peeked skb is OOB skb. In such a case, manage_oob() pops it out of the receive queue but does not clear unix_sock(sk)->oob_skb. This is wrong in terms of uAPI. Let's say we send "hello" with MSG_OOB, and "world" without MSG_OOB. The 'o' is handled as OOB data. When recv() is called twice without MSG_OOB, the OOB data should be lost. >>> from socket import * >>> c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) >>> c1.send(b'hello', MSG_OOB) # 'o' is OOB data 5 >>> c1.send(b'world') 5 >>> c2.recv(5) # OOB data is not received b'hell' >>> c2.recv(5) # OOB date is skipped b'world' >>> c2.recv(5, MSG_OOB) # This should return an error b'o' In the same situation, TCP actually returns -EINVAL for the last recv(). Also, if we do not clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb, unix_poll() always set EPOLLPRI even though the data has passed through by previous recv(). To avoid these issues, we must clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb when dequeuing it from recv queue. The reason why the old GC did not trigger the deadlock is because the old GC relied on the receive queue to detect the loop. When it is triggered, the socket with OOB data is marked as GC candidate because file refcount == inflight count (1). However, after traversing all inflight sockets, the socket still has a positive inflight count (1), thus the socket is excluded from candidates. Then, the old GC lose the chance to garbage-collect the socket. With the old GC, the repro continues to create true garbage that will never be freed nor detected by kmemleak as it's linked to the global inflight list. That's why we couldn't even notice the issue.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Clear stale u->oob_skb. syzkaller started to report deadlock of unix_gc_lock after commit 4090fa373f0e ("af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm."), but it just uncovers the bug that has been there since commit 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support"). The repro basically does the following. from socket import * from array import array c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM) c1.sendmsg([b'a'], [(SOL_SOCKET, SCM_RIGHTS, array("i", [c2.fileno()]))], MSG_OOB) c2.recv(1) # blocked as no normal data in recv queue c2.close() # done async and unblock recv() c1.close() # done async and trigger GC A socket sends its file descriptor to itself as OOB data and tries to receive normal data, but finally recv() fails due to async close(). The problem here is wrong handling of OOB skb in manage_oob(). When recvmsg() is called without MSG_OOB, manage_oob() is called to check if the peeked skb is OOB skb. In such a case, manage_oob() pops it out of the receive queue but does not clear unix_sock(sk)->oob_skb. This is wrong in terms of uAPI. Let's say we send "hello" with MSG_OOB, and "world" without MSG_OOB. The 'o' is handled as OOB data. When recv() is called twice without MSG_OOB, the OOB data should be lost. >>> from socket import * >>> c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) >>> c1.send(b'hello', MSG_OOB) # 'o' is OOB data 5 >>> c1.send(b'world') 5 >>> c2.recv(5) # OOB data is not received b'hell' >>> c2.recv(5) # OOB date is skipped b'world' >>> c2.recv(5, MSG_OOB) # This should return an error b'o' In the same situation, TCP actually returns -EINVAL for the last recv(). Also, if we do not clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb, unix_poll() always set EPOLLPRI even though the data has passed through by previous recv(). To avoid these issues, we must clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb when dequeuing it from recv queue. The reason why the old GC did not trigger the deadlock is because the old GC relied on the receive queue to detect the loop. When it is triggered, the socket with OOB data is marked as GC candidate because file refcount == inflight count (1). However, after traversing all inflight sockets, the socket still has a positive inflight count (1), thus the socket is excluded from candidates. Then, the old GC lose the chance to garbage-collect the socket. With the old GC, the repro continues to create true garbage that will never be freed nor detected by kmemleak as it's linked to the global inflight list. That's why we couldn't even notice the issue.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2711Android Patchday Dezember 2025: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Google Android ausnutzen, um sich erweiterte Berechtigungen zu verschaffen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1056Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Android

s ont été découvertes dans Google Android. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service. Google indique que les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-48633 et CVE-2025-48572 sont activement exploitées. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Google Android du 01 décembre 2025 https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2025-12-01?hl=fr Référence CVE CVE-2023-40130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-20725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-20726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-20727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-20730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-022754Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0379Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Google Android en Samsung Mobile

Recent updates to the SUSE Linux Enterprise 15 SP6 and Ubuntu Linux Kernels addressed multiple security vulnerabilities, including memory leaks, buffer overflows, and potential remote code execution risks.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 314001f0bf927015e459c9d387d62a231fe93af3 < b4bc99d04c689b5652665394ae8d3e02fb754153, 314001f0bf927015e459c9d387d62a231fe93af3 < 84a352b7eba1142a95441380058985ff19f25ec9, 314001f0bf927015e459c9d387d62a231fe93af3 < 601a89ea24d05089debfa2dc896ea9f5937ac7a6, 314001f0bf927015e459c9d387d62a231fe93af3 < 698a95ade1a00e6494482046902b986dfffd1caf, 314001f0bf927015e459c9d387d62a231fe93af3 < b46f4eaa4f0ec38909fb0072eea3aeddb32f954e, 5.15
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 5.15.156 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.87 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.28 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.7 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 May 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:14 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35688
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-35970 · cve.blacktree.nl