BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-35949High confidence

btrfs: make sure that WRITTEN is set on all metadata blocks

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35667

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: make sure that WRITTEN is set on all metadata blocks We previously would call btrfs_check_leaf() if we had the check integrity code enabled, which meant that we could only run the extended leaf checks if we had WRITTEN set on the header flags. This leaves a gap in our checking, because we could end up with corruption on disk where WRITTEN isn't set on the leaf, and then the extended leaf checks don't get run which we rely on to validate all of the item pointers to make sure we don't access memory outside of the extent buffer. However, since 732fab95abe2 ("btrfs: check-integrity: remove CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY option") we no longer call btrfs_check_leaf() from btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), which means we only ever call it on blocks that are being written out, and thus have WRITTEN set, or that are being read in, which should have WRITTEN set. Add checks to make sure we have WRITTEN set appropriately, and then make sure __btrfs_check_leaf() always does the item checking. This will protect us from file systems that have been corrupted and no longer have WRITTEN set on some of the blocks. This was hit on a crafted image tweaking the WRITTEN bit and reported by KASAN as out-of-bound access in the eb accessors. The example is a dir item at the end of an eb. [2.042] BTRFS warning (device loop1): bad eb member start: ptr 0x3fff start 30572544 member offset 16410 size 2 [2.040] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe0009d1000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [2.537] KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x0005088000000018-0x000508800000001f] [2.729] CPU: 0 PID: 2587 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 [2.729] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [2.621] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] RSP: 0018:ffff88810871fab8 EFLAGS: 00000206 [2.621] RAX: 0000a11000000003 RBX: ffff888104ff8720 RCX: ffff88811b2288c0 [2.621] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff81dd8aca RDI: ffff88810871f748 [2.621] RBP: 000000000000401a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10210e3ee9 [2.621] R10: ffff88810871f74f R11: 205d323430333737 R12: 000000000000001a [2.621] R13: 000508800000001a R14: 1ffff110210e3f5d R15: ffffffff850011e8 [2.621] FS: 00007f56ea275840(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [2.621] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [2.621] CR2: 00007febd13b75c0 CR3: 000000010bb50000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [2.621] Call Trace: [2.621] <TASK> [2.621] ? show_regs+0x74/0x80 [2.621] ? die_addr+0x46/0xc0 [2.621] ? exc_general_protection+0x161/0x2a0 [2.621] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0 [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_get_16+0x10/0x10 [2.621] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10 [2.621] btrfs_match_dir_item_name+0x101/0x1a0 [2.621] btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x1f3/0x280 [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x10/0x10 [2.621] btrfs_get_tree+0xd25/0x1910 [ copy more details from report ]

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: make sure that WRITTEN is set on all metadata blocks We previously would call btrfs_check_leaf() if we had the check integrity code enabled, which meant that we could only run the extended leaf checks if we had WRITTEN set on the header flags. This leaves a gap in our checking, because we could end up with corruption on disk where WRITTEN isn't set on the leaf, and then the extended leaf checks don't get run which we rely on to validate all of the item pointers to make sure we don't access memory outside of the extent buffer. However, since 732fab95abe2 ("btrfs: check-integrity: remove CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY option") we no longer call btrfs_check_leaf() from btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), which means we only ever call it on blocks that are being written out, and thus have WRITTEN set, or that are being read in, which should have WRITTEN set. Add checks to make sure we have WRITTEN set appropriately, and then make sure __btrfs_check_leaf() always does the item checking. This will protect us from file systems that have been corrupted and no longer have WRITTEN set on some of the blocks. This was hit on a crafted image tweaking the WRITTEN bit and reported by KASAN as out-of-bound access in the eb accessors. The example is a dir item at the end of an eb. [2.042] BTRFS warning (device loop1): bad eb member start: ptr 0x3fff start 30572544 member offset 16410 size 2 [2.040] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe0009d1000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [2.537] KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x0005088000000018-0x000508800000001f] [2.729] CPU: 0 PID: 2587 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 [2.729] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [2.621] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] RSP: 0018:ffff88810871fab8 EFLAGS: 00000206 [2.621] RAX: 0000a11000000003 RBX: ffff888104ff8720 RCX: ffff88811b2288c0 [2.621] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff81dd8aca RDI: ffff88810871f748 [2.621] RBP: 000000000000401a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10210e3ee9 [2.621] R10: ffff88810871f74f R11: 205d323430333737 R12: 000000000000001a [2.621] R13: 000508800000001a R14: 1ffff110210e3f5d R15: ffffffff850011e8 [2.621] FS: 00007f56ea275840(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [2.621] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [2.621] CR2: 00007febd13b75c0 CR3: 000000010bb50000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [2.621] Call Trace: [2.621] <TASK> [2.621] ? show_regs+0x74/0x80 [2.621] ? die_addr+0x46/0xc0 [2.621] ? exc_general_protection+0x161/0x2a0 [2.621] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0 [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_get_16+0x10/0x10 [2.621] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10 [2.621] btrfs_match_dir_item_name+0x101/0x1a0 [2.621] btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x1f3/0x280 [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x10/0x10 [2.621] btrfs_get_tree+0xd25/0x1910 [ copy more details from report ]

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: make sure that WRITTEN is set on all metadata blocks We previously would call btrfs_check_leaf() if we had the check integrity code enabled, which meant that we could only run the extended leaf checks if we had WRITTEN set on the header flags. This leaves a gap in our checking, because we could end up with corruption on disk where WRITTEN isn't set on the leaf, and then the extended leaf checks don't get run which we rely on to validate all of the item pointers to make sure we don't access memory outside of the extent buffer. However, since 732fab95abe2 ("btrfs: check-integrity: remove CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY option") we no longer call btrfs_check_leaf() from btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), which means we only ever call it on blocks that are being written out, and thus have WRITTEN set, or that are being read in, which should have WRITTEN set. Add checks to make sure we have WRITTEN set appropriately, and then make sure __btrfs_check_leaf() always does the item checking. This will protect us from file systems that have been corrupted and no longer have WRITTEN set on some of the blocks. This was hit on a crafted image tweaking the WRITTEN bit and reported by KASAN as out-of-bound access in the eb accessors. The example is a dir item at the end of an eb. [2.042] BTRFS warning (device loop1): bad eb member start: ptr 0x3fff start 30572544 member offset 16410 size 2 [2.040] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe0009d1000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [2.537] KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x0005088000000018-0x000508800000001f] [2.729] CPU: 0 PID: 2587 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 [2.729] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [2.621] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] RSP: 0018:ffff88810871fab8 EFLAGS: 00000206 [2.621] RAX: 0000a11000000003 RBX: ffff888104ff8720 RCX: ffff88811b2288c0 [2.621] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff81dd8aca RDI: ffff88810871f748 [2.621] RBP: 000000000000401a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10210e3ee9 [2.621] R10: ffff88810871f74f R11: 205d323430333737 R12: 000000000000001a [2.621] R13: 000508800000001a R14: 1ffff110210e3f5d R15: ffffffff850011e8 [2.621] FS: 00007f56ea275840(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [2.621] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [2.621] CR2: 00007febd13b75c0 CR3: 000000010bb50000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [2.621] Call Trace: [2.621] <TASK> [2.621] ? show_regs+0x74/0x80 [2.621] ? die_addr+0x46/0xc0 [2.621] ? exc_general_protection+0x161/0x2a0 [2.621] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0 [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_get_16+0x10/0x10 [2.621] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10 [2.621] btrfs_match_dir_item_name+0x101/0x1a0 [2.621] btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x1f3/0x280 [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x10/0x10 [2.621] btrfs_get_tree+0xd25/0x1910 [ copy more details from report ]

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0234Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

cord?id=CVE-2023-1192 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26708 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35847 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36476 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0071Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1079Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1048Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27043 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38538 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0822Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27437 Référence CVE CVE-2024-31076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0694Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35856 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35859 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35983 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35856 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35859 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35983 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-029727Fedora Project等の複数ベンダの製品における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

LinuxカーネルのBtrfsファイルシステムでは、特定の状況下でメタデータブロックにWRITTENフラグが適切に設定されていない場合、リーフの整合性チェックが正しく実施されず、システムが範囲外のメモリにアクセスしてクラッシュや情報漏えいのリスクが生じる問題が発生していました。この脆弱性により、細工されたディスクイメージなどを処理する際にKASANによる検出を伴うメモリアクセス違反が発生する可能性があります。対策として、すべてのメタデータブロックでWRITTENが適切に設定され、リーフチェック時にアイテムの検証が確実に行われるよう修正されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 85d8a826c7cde17f9cca9c4debecb4538bdb6573 < 9dff3e36ea89e8003516841c27c45af562b6ef44, 85d8a826c7cde17f9cca9c4debecb4538bdb6573 < ef3ba8ce8cf7075b716aa4afcefc3034215878ee, 85d8a826c7cde17f9cca9c4debecb4538bdb6573 < e03418abde871314e1a3a550f4c8afb7b89cb273, 6.5
Fixed
Linux: < 6.5, 6.6.85 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.10 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 May 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35667
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-35949 · cve.blacktree.nl