BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-35944High confidence

VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 12 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.23% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.90-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
CVE-2024-35944 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 118 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-35944
161 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host() Syzkaller hit 'WARNING in dg_dispatch_as_host' bug. memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 56) of single field "&dg_info->msg" at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (size 24) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 dg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 Some code commentry, based on my understanding: 544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size) /// This is 24 + payload_size memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size); Destination = dg_info->msg ---> this is a 24 byte structure(struct vmci_datagram) Source = dg --> this is a 24 byte structure (struct vmci_datagram) Size = dg_size = 24 + payload_size {payload_size = 56-24 =32} -- Syzkaller managed to set payload_size to 32. 35 struct delayed_datagram_info { 36 struct datagram_entry *entry; 37 struct work_struct work; 38 bool in_dg_host_queue; 39 /* msg and msg_payload must be together. */ 40 struct vmci_datagram msg; 41 u8 msg_payload[]; 42 }; So those extra bytes of payload are copied into msg_payload[], a run time warning is seen while fuzzing with Syzkaller. One possible way to fix the warning is to split the memcpy() into two parts -- one -- direct assignment of msg and second taking care of payload. Gustavo quoted: "Under FORTIFY_SOURCE we should not copy data across multiple members in a structure."
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host()
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host()
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35662

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host() Syzkaller hit 'WARNING in dg_dispatch_as_host' bug. memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 56) of single field "&dg_info->msg" at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (size 24) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 dg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 Some code commentry, based on my understanding: 544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size) /// This is 24 + payload_size memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size); Destination = dg_info->msg ---> this is a 24 byte structure(struct vmci_datagram) Source = dg --> this is a 24 byte structure (struct vmci_datagram) Size = dg_size = 24 + payload_size {payload_size = 56-24 =32} -- Syzkaller managed to set payload_size to 32. 35 struct delayed_datagram_info { 36 struct datagram_entry *entry; 37 struct work_struct work; 38 bool in_dg_host_queue; 39 /* msg and msg_payload must be together. */ 40 struct vmci_datagram msg; 41 u8 msg_payload[]; 42 }; So those extra bytes of payload are copied into msg_payload[], a run time warning is seen while fuzzing with Syzkaller. One possible way to fix the warning is to split the memcpy() into two parts -- one -- direct assignment of msg and second taking care of payload. Gustavo quoted: "Under FORTIFY_SOURCE we should not copy data across multiple members in a structure."

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host() Syzkaller hit 'WARNING in dg_dispatch_as_host' bug. memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 56) of single field "&dg_info->msg" at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (size 24) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 dg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 Some code commentry, based on my understanding: 544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size) /// This is 24 + payload_size memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size); Destination = dg_info->msg ---> this is a 24 byte structure(struct vmci_datagram) Source = dg --> this is a 24 byte structure (struct vmci_datagram) Size = dg_size = 24 + payload_size {payload_size = 56-24 =32} -- Syzkaller managed to set payload_size to 32. 35 struct delayed_datagram_info { 36 struct datagram_entry *entry; 37 struct work_struct work; 38 bool in_dg_host_queue; 39 /* msg and msg_payload must be together. */ 40 struct vmci_datagram msg; 41 u8 msg_payload[]; 42 }; So those extra bytes of payload are copied into msg_payload[], a run time warning is seen while fuzzing with Syzkaller. One possible way to fix the warning is to split the memcpy() into two parts -- one -- direct assignment of msg and second taking care of payload. Gustavo quoted: "Under FORTIFY_SOURCE we should not copy data across multiple members in a structure."

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host() Syzkaller hit 'WARNING in dg_dispatch_as_host' bug. memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 56) of single field "&dg_info->msg" at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (size 24) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 dg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 Some code commentry, based on my understanding: 544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size) /// This is 24 + payload_size memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size); Destination = dg_info->msg ---> this is a 24 byte structure(struct vmci_datagram) Source = dg --> this is a 24 byte structure (struct vmci_datagram) Size = dg_size = 24 + payload_size {payload_size = 56-24 =32} -- Syzkaller managed to set payload_size to 32. 35 struct delayed_datagram_info { 36 struct datagram_entry *entry; 37 struct work_struct work; 38 bool in_dg_host_queue; 39 /* msg and msg_payload must be together. */ 40 struct vmci_datagram msg; 41 u8 msg_payload[]; 42 }; So those extra bytes of payload are copied into msg_payload[], a run time warning is seen while fuzzing with Syzkaller. One possible way to fix the warning is to split the memcpy() into two parts -- one -- direct assignment of msg and second taking care of payload. Gustavo quoted: "Under FORTIFY_SOURCE we should not copy data across multiple members in a structure."

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0225Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain ausnutzen, um erhöhte Rechte zu erlangen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0021Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-26960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0821Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0527Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-029645Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.9, 4.19.312 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.274 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.215 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.155 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.86 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.27 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.6 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2024 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 11:53 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35662
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-35944 · cve.blacktree.nl