BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-35938High confidence

wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.90-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35728

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB Currently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assigned with 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channel buffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where system memory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim is not allowed. There is a fail report which is caused by it: kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0 CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfceb Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0 device_resume+0x104/0x340 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10 async_resume+0x1d/0x30 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120 process_one_work+0x168/0x330 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe8/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication. And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is less than 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1 allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save some memory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failure in those scenarios. Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB Currently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assigned with 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channel buffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where system memory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim is not allowed. There is a fail report which is caused by it: kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0 CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfceb Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0 device_resume+0x104/0x340 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10 async_resume+0x1d/0x30 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120 process_one_work+0x168/0x330 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe8/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication. And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is less than 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1 allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save some memory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failure in those scenarios. Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB Currently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assigned with 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channel buffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where system memory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim is not allowed. There is a fail report which is caused by it: kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0 CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfceb Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0 device_resume+0x104/0x340 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10 async_resume+0x1d/0x30 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120 process_one_work+0x168/0x330 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe8/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication. And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is less than 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1 allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save some memory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failure in those scenarios. Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1913Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0335Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35928 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35928 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028753Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: d5c65159f2895379e11ca13f62feabe93278985d < 805a1cdde82fec00c7471a393f4bb437b2741559, d5c65159f2895379e11ca13f62feabe93278985d < 6597a6687af54e2cb58371cf8f6ee4dd85c537de, d5c65159f2895379e11ca13f62feabe93278985d < 138fdeac75fb7512a7f9f1c3b236cd2e754af793, d5c65159f2895379e11ca13f62feabe93278985d < ae5876b3b7b2243d874e2afa099e7926122087a1, d5c65159f2895379e11ca13f62feabe93278985d < 1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015, 5.6
Fixed
Linux: < 5.6, 5.15.155 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.86 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.27 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.6 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:14 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35728
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-35938 · cve.blacktree.nl