BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-35910High confidence

tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.26% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
CVE-2024-35910 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 86 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-35910
381 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled. Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago. When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers. inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later. For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns. For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns. This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler. Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held. It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code) We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled. Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago. When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers. inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later. For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns. For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns. This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler. Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held. It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code) We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled. Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago. When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers. inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later. For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns. For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns. This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler. Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held. It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code) We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35628

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled. Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago. When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers. inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later. For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns. For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns. This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler. Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held. It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code) We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled. Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago. When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers. inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later. For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns. For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns. This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler. Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held. It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code) We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled. Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago. When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers. inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later. For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns. For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns. This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler. Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held. It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code) We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1913Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41149 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53024 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53025 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41149 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-35814 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0695Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-35800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-35824 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0527Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-029642Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.2, 4.19.312 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.274 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.215 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.154 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.85 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.26 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.5 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35628
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-35910 · cve.blacktree.nl