BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence

Full vulnerability report · 2024

CVE-2024-35895High confidence

bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1

Recommended action

Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available

Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu release	Source package	Vendor state	Fixed version	Evidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-aws`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-fde`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gcp`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gke`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gkeop`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-ibm`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-intel`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-tegra`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oem-6.11`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oracle`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-riscv`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-xilinx`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current

SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1

1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem

Summary: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem syzkaller started using corpuses where a BPF tracing program deletes elements from a sockmap/sockhash map. Because BPF tracing programs can be invoked from any interrupt context, locks taken during a map_delete_elem operation must be hardirq-safe. Otherwise a deadlock due to lock inversion is possible, as reported by lockdep: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&host->lock); lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); lock(&host->lock); Locks in sockmap are hardirq-unsafe by design. We expects elements to be deleted from sockmap/sockhash only in task (normal) context with interrupts enabled, or in softirq context. Detect when map_delete_elem operation is invoked from a context which is _not_ hardirq-unsafe, that is interrupts are disabled, and bail out with an error. Note that map updates are not affected by this issue. BPF verifier does not allow updating sockmap/sockhash from a BPF tracing program today.
Remediation: Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current

ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35613

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state: Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation: Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score: Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence: No linked advisory details stored yet

Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem syzkaller started using corpuses where a BPF tracing program deletes elements from a sockmap/sockhash map. Because BPF tracing programs can be invoked from any interrupt context, locks taken during a map_delete_elem operation must be hardirq-safe. Otherwise a deadlock due to lock inversion is possible, as reported by lockdep: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&host->lock); lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); <Interrupt> lock(&host->lock); Locks in sockmap are hardirq-unsafe by design. We expects elements to be deleted from sockmap/sockhash only in task (normal) context with interrupts enabled, or in softirq context. Detect when map_delete_elem operation is invoked from a context which is _not_ hardirq-unsafe, that is interrupts are disabled, and bail out with an error. Note that map updates are not affected by this issue. BPF verifier does not allow updating sockmap/sockhash from a BPF tracing program today.

What

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path: local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface: Local
Privileges required: Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction: None
Attack complexity: Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary: Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ? CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.: CWE-667 ↗
CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.
CVSS vector ? CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land: The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.

CWE-667

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35613Official EUVD mapping

0 linked advisory records.

Official EUVD record

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0225Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain ausnutzen, um erhöhte Rechte zu erlangen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2023-6531 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35815 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36476 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0821Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-26993 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0749Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service.

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0527Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-35854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status ? Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.: Patch available
Affected: SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Fixed: < 4.20; 5.4.274 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.215 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.154 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.85 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.26 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.8.5 ≤ 6.8.*; 6.9 ≤ *
Action: Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround: Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2024 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 11:52 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2

CVSS sourceNIST NVD

EPSS source

The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.

FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14

European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35613

Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT

Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT

CWE sourceNIST NVD

NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

2024-05-19CVE published

2026-05-12Fixed release or patch reference recorded

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35613↗Vendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗

Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report

CVE: Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS: Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS: Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE: Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA: CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD: National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT: A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC: Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF: Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL: Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.

bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem

National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

EUVD-2024-35613

What, why and how

Exploit reality and attack path

Official authority intelligence

Patch and workaround

Evidence and provenance

National CERT insights
?
CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.