BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-35886High confidence

ipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done().

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-265688 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 12 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.28% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done(). syzkaller reported infinite recursive calls of fib6_dump_done() during netlink socket destruction. From the log, syzkaller sent an AF_UNSPEC RTM_GETROUTE message, and then the response was generated. The following recvmmsg() resumed the dump for IPv6, but the first call of inet6_dump_fib() failed at kzalloc() due to the fault injection. 12:01:34 executing program 3: r0 = socket$nl_route(0x10, 0x3, 0x0) sendmsg$nl_route(r0, ... snip ...) recvmmsg(r0, ... snip ...) (fail_nth: 8) Here, fib6_dump_done() was set to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done, and the next call of inet6_dump_fib() set it to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3]. syzkaller stopped receiving the response halfway through, and finally netlink_sock_destruct() called nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done(). fib6_dump_done() calls fib6_dump_end() and nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() if it is still not NULL. fib6_dump_end() rewrites nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() by nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3], but it has the same function, not NULL, calling itself recursively and hitting the stack guard page. To avoid the issue, let's set the destructor after kzalloc().
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35604

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done(). syzkaller reported infinite recursive calls of fib6_dump_done() during netlink socket destruction. [1] From the log, syzkaller sent an AF_UNSPEC RTM_GETROUTE message, and then the response was generated. The following recvmmsg() resumed the dump for IPv6, but the first call of inet6_dump_fib() failed at kzalloc() due to the fault injection. [0] 12:01:34 executing program 3: r0 = socket$nl_route(0x10, 0x3, 0x0) sendmsg$nl_route(r0, ... snip ...) recvmmsg(r0, ... snip ...) (fail_nth: 8) Here, fib6_dump_done() was set to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done, and the next call of inet6_dump_fib() set it to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3]. syzkaller stopped receiving the response halfway through, and finally netlink_sock_destruct() called nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done(). fib6_dump_done() calls fib6_dump_end() and nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() if it is still not NULL. fib6_dump_end() rewrites nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() by nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3], but it has the same function, not NULL, calling itself recursively and hitting the stack guard page. To avoid the issue, let's set the destructor after kzalloc(). [0]: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0 CPU: 1 PID: 432110 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117) should_fail_ex (lib/fault-inject.c:52 lib/fault-inject.c:153) should_failslab (mm/slub.c:3733) kmalloc_trace (mm/slub.c:3748 mm/slub.c:3827 mm/slub.c:3992) inet6_dump_fib (./include/linux/slab.h:628 ./include/linux/slab.h:749 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:662) rtnl_dump_all (net/core/rtnetlink.c:4029) netlink_dump (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2269) netlink_recvmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988) ____sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:1046 net/socket.c:2801) ___sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:2846) do_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:2943) __x64_sys_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:3041 net/socket.c:3034 net/socket.c:3034) [1]: BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at 00000000f2fa9af1 (stack is 00000000b7912430..000000009a436beb) stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 223719 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events netlink_sock_destruct_work RIP: 0010:fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:570) Code: 3c 24 e8 f3 e9 51 fd e9 28 fd ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd <53> 48 8d 5d 60 e8 b6 4d 07 fd 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d980000 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff84405990 RCX: ffffffff844059d3 RDX: ffff8881028e0000 RSI: ffffffff84405ac2 RDI: ffff88810c02f358 RBP: ffff88810c02f358 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000224 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff888007c82c78 R14: ffff888007c82c68 R15: ffff888007c82c68 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc9000d97fff8 CR3: 0000000102309002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <#DF> </#DF> <TASK> fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) ... fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) netlink_sock_destruct (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:401) __sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2177 (discriminator 2)) sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2224) __sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2235) sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2246) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue. ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done(). syzkaller reported infinite recursive calls of fib6_dump_done() during netlink socket destruction. [1] From the log, syzkaller sent an AF_UNSPEC RTM_GETROUTE message, and then the response was generated. The following recvmmsg() resumed the dump for IPv6, but the first call of inet6_dump_fib() failed at kzalloc() due to the fault injection. [0] 12:01:34 executing program 3: r0 = socket$nl_route(0x10, 0x3, 0x0) sendmsg$nl_route(r0, ... snip ...) recvmmsg(r0, ... snip ...) (fail_nth: 8) Here, fib6_dump_done() was set to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done, and the next call of inet6_dump_fib() set it to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3]. syzkaller stopped receiving the response halfway through, and finally netlink_sock_destruct() called nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done(). fib6_dump_done() calls fib6_dump_end() and nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() if it is still not NULL. fib6_dump_end() rewrites nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() by nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3], but it has the same function, not NULL, calling itself recursively and hitting the stack guard page. To avoid the issue, let's set the destructor after kzalloc(). [0]: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0 CPU: 1 PID: 432110 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117) should_fail_ex (lib/fault-inject.c:52 lib/fault-inject.c:153) should_failslab (mm/slub.c:3733) kmalloc_trace (mm/slub.c:3748 mm/slub.c:3827 mm/slub.c:3992) inet6_dump_fib (./include/linux/slab.h:628 ./include/linux/slab.h:749 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:662) rtnl_dump_all (net/core/rtnetlink.c:4029) netlink_dump (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2269) netlink_recvmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988) ____sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:1046 net/socket.c:2801) ___sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:2846) do_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:2943) __x64_sys_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:3041 net/socket.c:3034 net/socket.c:3034) [1]: BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at 00000000f2fa9af1 (stack is 00000000b7912430..000000009a436beb) stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 223719 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events netlink_sock_destruct_work RIP: 0010:fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:570) Code: 3c 24 e8 f3 e9 51 fd e9 28 fd ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd <53> 48 8d 5d 60 e8 b6 4d 07 fd 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d980000 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff84405990 RCX: ffffffff844059d3 RDX: ffff8881028e0000 RSI: ffffffff84405ac2 RDI: ffff88810c02f358 RBP: ffff88810c02f358 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000224 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff888007c82c78 R14: ffff888007c82c68 R15: ffff888007c82c68 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc9000d97fff8 CR3: 0000000102309002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <#DF> </#DF> <TASK> fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) ... fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) netlink_sock_destruct (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:401) __sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2177 (discriminator 2)) sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2224) __sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2235) sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2246) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue. ---truncated---

Why

The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done(). syzkaller reported infinite recursive calls of fib6_dump_done() during netlink socket destruction. [1] From the log, syzkaller sent an AF_UNSPEC RTM_GETROUTE message, and then the response was generated. The following recvmmsg() resumed the dump for IPv6, but the first call of inet6_dump_fib() failed at kzalloc() due to the fault injection. [0] 12:01:34 executing program 3: r0 = socket$nl_route(0x10, 0x3, 0x0) sendmsg$nl_route(r0, ... snip ...) recvmmsg(r0, ... snip ...) (fail_nth: 8) Here, fib6_dump_done() was set to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done, and the next call of inet6_dump_fib() set it to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3]. syzkaller stopped receiving the response halfway through, and finally netlink_sock_destruct() called nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done(). fib6_dump_done() calls fib6_dump_end() and nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() if it is still not NULL. fib6_dump_end() rewrites nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() by nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3], but it has the same function, not NULL, calling itself recursively and hitting the stack guard page. To avoid the issue, let's set the destructor after kzalloc(). [0]: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0 CPU: 1 PID: 432110 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117) should_fail_ex (lib/fault-inject.c:52 lib/fault-inject.c:153) should_failslab (mm/slub.c:3733) kmalloc_trace (mm/slub.c:3748 mm/slub.c:3827 mm/slub.c:3992) inet6_dump_fib (./include/linux/slab.h:628 ./include/linux/slab.h:749 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:662) rtnl_dump_all (net/core/rtnetlink.c:4029) netlink_dump (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2269) netlink_recvmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988) ____sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:1046 net/socket.c:2801) ___sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:2846) do_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:2943) __x64_sys_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:3041 net/socket.c:3034 net/socket.c:3034) [1]: BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at 00000000f2fa9af1 (stack is 00000000b7912430..000000009a436beb) stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 223719 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events netlink_sock_destruct_work RIP: 0010:fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:570) Code: 3c 24 e8 f3 e9 51 fd e9 28 fd ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd <53> 48 8d 5d 60 e8 b6 4d 07 fd 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d980000 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff84405990 RCX: ffffffff844059d3 RDX: ffff8881028e0000 RSI: ffffffff84405ac2 RDI: ffff88810c02f358 RBP: ffff88810c02f358 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000224 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff888007c82c78 R14: ffff888007c82c68 R15: ffff888007c82c68 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc9000d97fff8 CR3: 0000000102309002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <#DF> </#DF> <TASK> fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) ... fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) netlink_sock_destruct (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:401) __sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2177 (discriminator 2)) sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2224) __sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2235) sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2246) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue. ---truncated---

Why

The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Uncontrolled Recursion → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-674 ↗

CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion. The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-674
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1293IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Informationen auszuspähen, einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen oder weitere unspezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35247 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0610Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0578Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0527Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-35849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-029689Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における複数の脆弱性

LinuxカーネルにはIPv6ルーティングに関連する問題があり、誤ったタイミングでデストラクタが設定されることで、fib6_dump_done関数が無限再帰してスタックオーバーフローが発生する可能性がありました。この問題は、fib6_dump_done内でコールバックが意図せず再帰することによって引き起こされましたが、デストラクタの設定タイミングを修正することで再帰が防止されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.12, 4.19.312 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.274 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.215 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.154 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.85 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.26 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.5 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2024 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 11:52 UTC · CWE-674 · Uncontrolled Recursion

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35604
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-35886 · cve.blacktree.nl