BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-35870High confidence

smb: client: fix UAF in smb2_reconnect_server()

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.62% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.123-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-35588

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix UAF in smb2_reconnect_server() The UAF bug is due to smb2_reconnect_server() accessing a session that is already being teared down by another thread that is executing __cifs_put_smb_ses(). This can happen when (a) the client has connection to the server but no session or (b) another thread ends up setting @ses->ses_status again to something different than SES_EXITING. To fix this, we need to make sure to unconditionally set @ses->ses_status to SES_EXITING and prevent any other threads from setting a new status while we're still tearing it down. The following can be reproduced by adding some delay to right after the ipc is freed in __cifs_put_smb_ses() - which will give smb2_reconnect_server() worker a chance to run and then accessing @ses->ipc: kinit ... mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o sec=krb5,nohandlecache,echo_interval=10 [disconnect srv] ls /mnt/1 &>/dev/null sleep 30 kdestroy [reconnect srv] sleep 10 umount /mnt/1 ... CIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed CIFS: VFS: \\srv Send error in SessSetup = -126 CIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed CIFS: VFS: \\srv Send error in SessSetup = -126 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 Workqueue: cifsiod smb2_reconnect_server [cifs] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0 Code: 4f 08 48 85 d2 74 42 48 85 c9 74 59 48 b8 00 01 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 39 c2 74 61 48 b8 22 01 00 00 00 00 74 69 <48> 8b 01 48 39 f8 75 7b 48 8b 72 08 48 39 c6 0f 85 88 00 00 00 b8 RSP: 0018:ffffc900001bfd70 EFLAGS: 00010a83 RAX: dead000000000122 RBX: ffff88810da53838 RCX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RDX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RSI: ffffffffc02f6878 RDI: ffff88810da53800 RBP: ffff88810da53800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88810c064000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88810c064000 R15: ffff8881039cc000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888157c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe3728b1000 CR3: 000000010caa4000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x1c1/0x3f0 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0 __cifs_put_smb_ses+0x1ae/0x500 [cifs] smb2_reconnect_server+0x4ed/0x710 [cifs] process_one_work+0x205/0x6b0 worker_thread+0x191/0x360 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe2/0x110 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix UAF in smb2_reconnect_server() The UAF bug is due to smb2_reconnect_server() accessing a session that is already being teared down by another thread that is executing __cifs_put_smb_ses(). This can happen when (a) the client has connection to the server but no session or (b) another thread ends up setting @ses->ses_status again to something different than SES_EXITING. To fix this, we need to make sure to unconditionally set @ses->ses_status to SES_EXITING and prevent any other threads from setting a new status while we're still tearing it down. The following can be reproduced by adding some delay to right after the ipc is freed in __cifs_put_smb_ses() - which will give smb2_reconnect_server() worker a chance to run and then accessing @ses->ipc: kinit ... mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o sec=krb5,nohandlecache,echo_interval=10 [disconnect srv] ls /mnt/1 &>/dev/null sleep 30 kdestroy [reconnect srv] sleep 10 umount /mnt/1 ... CIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed CIFS: VFS: \\srv Send error in SessSetup = -126 CIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed CIFS: VFS: \\srv Send error in SessSetup = -126 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 Workqueue: cifsiod smb2_reconnect_server [cifs] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0 Code: 4f 08 48 85 d2 74 42 48 85 c9 74 59 48 b8 00 01 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 39 c2 74 61 48 b8 22 01 00 00 00 00 74 69 <48> 8b 01 48 39 f8 75 7b 48 8b 72 08 48 39 c6 0f 85 88 00 00 00 b8 RSP: 0018:ffffc900001bfd70 EFLAGS: 00010a83 RAX: dead000000000122 RBX: ffff88810da53838 RCX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RDX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RSI: ffffffffc02f6878 RDI: ffff88810da53800 RBP: ffff88810da53800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88810c064000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88810c064000 R15: ffff8881039cc000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888157c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe3728b1000 CR3: 000000010caa4000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x1c1/0x3f0 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0 __cifs_put_smb_ses+0x1ae/0x500 [cifs] smb2_reconnect_server+0x4ed/0x710 [cifs] process_one_work+0x205/0x6b0 worker_thread+0x191/0x360 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe2/0x110 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix UAF in smb2_reconnect_server() The UAF bug is due to smb2_reconnect_server() accessing a session that is already being teared down by another thread that is executing __cifs_put_smb_ses(). This can happen when (a) the client has connection to the server but no session or (b) another thread ends up setting @ses->ses_status again to something different than SES_EXITING. To fix this, we need to make sure to unconditionally set @ses->ses_status to SES_EXITING and prevent any other threads from setting a new status while we're still tearing it down. The following can be reproduced by adding some delay to right after the ipc is freed in __cifs_put_smb_ses() - which will give smb2_reconnect_server() worker a chance to run and then accessing @ses->ipc: kinit ... mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o sec=krb5,nohandlecache,echo_interval=10 [disconnect srv] ls /mnt/1 &>/dev/null sleep 30 kdestroy [reconnect srv] sleep 10 umount /mnt/1 ... CIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed CIFS: VFS: \\srv Send error in SessSetup = -126 CIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed CIFS: VFS: \\srv Send error in SessSetup = -126 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 Workqueue: cifsiod smb2_reconnect_server [cifs] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0 Code: 4f 08 48 85 d2 74 42 48 85 c9 74 59 48 b8 00 01 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 39 c2 74 61 48 b8 22 01 00 00 00 00 74 69 <48> 8b 01 48 39 f8 75 7b 48 8b 72 08 48 39 c6 0f 85 88 00 00 00 b8 RSP: 0018:ffffc900001bfd70 EFLAGS: 00010a83 RAX: dead000000000122 RBX: ffff88810da53838 RCX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RDX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RSI: ffffffffc02f6878 RDI: ffff88810da53800 RBP: ffff88810da53800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88810c064000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88810c064000 R15: ffff8881039cc000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888157c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe3728b1000 CR3: 000000010caa4000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x1c1/0x3f0 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0 __cifs_put_smb_ses+0x1ae/0x500 [cifs] smb2_reconnect_server+0x4ed/0x710 [cifs] process_one_work+0x205/0x6b0 worker_thread+0x191/0x360 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe2/0x110 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-35803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35832 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-35803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35832 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2023-52530 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52916 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27407 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36476 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0610Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0578Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0577Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0528Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-021657Linux の Linux Kernel における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: b327a717e506980399464e304e363f94f95eb7a1 < 755fe68cd4b59e1d2a2dd3286177fd4404f57fed, b327a717e506980399464e304e363f94f95eb7a1 < 6202996a1c1887e83d0b3b0fcd86d0e5e6910ea0, b327a717e506980399464e304e363f94f95eb7a1 < 45f2beda1f1bc3d962ec07db1ccc3197c25499a5, b327a717e506980399464e304e363f94f95eb7a1 < 24a9799aa8efecd0eb55a75e35f9d8e6400063aa, 4.16
Fixed
Linux: < 4.16, 6.1.121 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.29 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.5 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-35588
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-35870 · cve.blacktree.nl