CVE-2024-35195 / GitHub GHSA-9WX4-H78V-VM56: Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False

Distribution release	Source package	Vendor state	Fixed version	Evidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · main	`py3-requests`	Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.	`2.32.3-r0`	Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · main	`py3-requests`	Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.	`2.32.3-r0`	Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · main	`py3-requests`	Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.	`2.32.3-r0`	Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · source	`requests`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`2.32.3+dfsg-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · source	`requests`	Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.	`Not published in this feed`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · source	`requests`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`2.32.3+dfsg-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · source	`requests`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`2.32.3+dfsg-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · esm-apps	`python-pip`	Vendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.	`24.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1.3+esm1`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`requests`	Under evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026

Ecosystem and package	Affected range	First fixed version	Evidence
PyPIrequests	`ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 2.32.0`	`2.32.0`	OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
piprequests	`< 2.32.0`	`2.32.0`	GitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 16 Jan 2026

Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified

What, why and how

Requests is a HTTP library. Prior to 2.32.0, when making requests through a Requests `Session`, if the first request is made with `verify=False` to disable cert verification, all subsequent requests to the same host will continue to ignore cert verification regardless of changes to the value of `verify`. This behavior will continue for the lifecycle of the connection in the connection pool. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.32.0.

What

Why

The code contains a control flow path that does not reflect the algorithm that the path is intended to implement, leading to incorrect behavior any time this path is navigated.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Why

The code contains a control flow path that does not reflect the algorithm that the path is intended to implement, leading to incorrect behavior any time this path is navigated.

How

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path: local access → Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface: Local
Privileges required: High: elevated access is required
User interaction: Required interaction required
Attack complexity: High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary: Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ? CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.: CWE-670 ↗
CWE-670: Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation. The code contains a control flow path that does not reflect the algorithm that the path is intended to implement, leading to incorrect behavior any time this path is navigated.
CVSS vector ? CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRHighPrivileges required: The attacker needs elevated or administrative privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land: The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.

CWE-670

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-1565Official EUVD mapping

0 linked advisory records.

Official EUVD record ↗

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2363Oracle MySQL: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle MySQL ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False

Evidence used

Compensating controls

Verification

EUVD-2024-1565

What, why and how

Exploit reality and attack path

Official authority intelligence

Patch and workaround

Evidence and provenance