Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
- EPSS is 0.77% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceUnknown · Unknown
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
| Distribution release | Source package | Vendor state | Fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debian trixietrixie · source | bouncycastle | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 1.80-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026 |
| Debian bookwormbookworm · source | bouncycastle | Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open. | Not published in this feed | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026 |
| Debian forkyforky · source | bouncycastle | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 1.80-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026 |
| Debian sidsid · source | bouncycastle | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 1.80-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · esm-apps | bouncycastle | Vendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree. | 1.77-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 | Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026 |
These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.
| Ecosystem and package | Affected range | First fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk12 | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 1.61; fixed 1.78 | 1.78 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk14 | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 1.61; fixed 1.78 | 1.78 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 1.61; fixed 1.78 | 1.78 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15to18 | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 1.61; fixed 1.78 | 1.78 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 1.61; fixed 1.78 | 1.78 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-lts8on | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 2.73.6 | 2.73.6 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bctls-fips | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 1.0.19 | 1.0.19 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk12 | >= 1.61, < 1.78 | 1.78 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 17 Apr 2026 |
| mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk14 | >= 1.61, < 1.78 | 1.78 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 17 Apr 2026 |
| mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on | >= 1.61, < 1.78 | 1.78 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 17 Apr 2026 |
| mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15to18 | >= 1.61, < 1.78 | 1.78 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 17 Apr 2026 |
| mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on | >= 1.61, < 1.78 | 1.78 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 17 Apr 2026 |
| mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-lts8on | < 2.73.6 | 2.73.6 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 17 Apr 2026 |
| mavenorg.bouncycastle:bctls-fips | < 1.0.19 | 1.0.19 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 17 Apr 2026 |
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Fix not verifiedAn issue was discovered in the Bouncy Castle Crypto Package For Java before BC TLS Java 1.0.19 (ships with BC Java 1.78, BC Java (LTS) 2.73.6) and before BC FIPS TLS Java 1.0.19. When endpoint identification is enabled in the BCJSSE and an SSL socket is created without an explicit hostname (as happens with HttpsURLConnection), hostname verification could be performed against a DNS-resolved IP address in some situations, opening up a possibility of DNS poisoning.
An issue was discovered in the Bouncy Castle Crypto Package For Java before BC TLS Java 1.0.19 (ships with BC Java 1.78, BC Java (LTS) 2.73.6) and before BC FIPS TLS Java 1.0.19. When endpoint identification is enabled in the BCJSSE and an SSL socket is created without an explicit hostname (as happens with HttpsURLConnection), hostname verification could be performed against a DNS-resolved IP address in some situations, opening up a possibility of DNS poisoning.
The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
An issue was discovered in the Bouncy Castle Crypto Package For Java before BC TLS Java 1.0.19 (ships with BC Java 1.78, BC Java (LTS) 2.73.6) and before BC FIPS TLS Java 1.0.19. When endpoint identification is enabled in the BCJSSE and an SSL socket is created without an explicit hostname (as happens with HttpsURLConnection), hostname verification could be performed against a DNS-resolved IP address in some situations, opening up a possibility of DNS poisoning.
The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch. The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 3 May 2024 · Last source change 17 Jun 2025, 19:33 UTC · CWE-297 · Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.