BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-30203High confidence

In Emacs before 29.3, Gnus treats inline MIME contents as trusted

Unknown · Unknown

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.58% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

10 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceemacsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:29.3+1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceorg-modeVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.6.23+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceemacsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:28.2+1-15+deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceorg-modeAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceemacsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:29.3+1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceorg-modeVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.6.23+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceemacsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:29.3+1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceorg-modeVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.6.23+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivexemacs21Under evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivexemacs21-packagesUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-28135

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In Emacs before 29.3, Gnus treats inline MIME contents as trusted.

What

In Emacs before 29.3, Gnus treats inline MIME contents as trusted.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In Emacs before 29.3, Gnus treats inline MIME contents as trusted.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Unauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0708GNU Emacs: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in GNU Emacs ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240327Security Bulletin 27 Mar 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 27 Mar 2024, published on 27 March 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0855Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper Networks

d?id=CVE-2024-27065 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27280 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27281 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27282 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27983 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28182 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30204 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30205 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-21147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21208 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21210 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21217 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21235 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21536 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21536 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21538 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27267 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30204 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30205 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39331 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43796 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43799 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0086Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2020-27511 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29425 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34917 Référence CVE CVE-2023-20584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20584 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2455 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31356 Référence CVE CVE-2024-10976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30205 Référence CVE CVE-2024-32007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39331 Référence CVE CVE-2024-4032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4032 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45490 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45491 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45492 Référence CVE CVE-2024-5535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2024-28182 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29133 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-30205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30205 Référence CVE CVE-2024-31076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-31882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33601 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-023131GNU Project の GNU Emacs 等複数ベンダの製品における脆弱性

GNU Project の GNU Emacs 等複数ベンダの製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
n/a
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Mar 2024 · Last source change 7 Nov 2024, 11:03 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-28135
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification, affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-30203 · cve.blacktree.nl