BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-27435High confidence

nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

11 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24639

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation We found a issue on production environment while using NVMe over RDMA, admin_q reconnect failed forever while remote target and network is ok. After dig into it, we found it may caused by a ABBA deadlock due to tag allocation. In my case, the tag was hold by a keep alive request waiting inside admin_q, as we quiesced admin_q while reset ctrl, so the request maked as idle and will not process before reset success. As fabric_q shares tagset with admin_q, while reconnect remote target, we need a tag for connect command, but the only one reserved tag was held by keep alive command which waiting inside admin_q. As a result, we failed to reconnect admin_q forever. In order to fix this issue, I think we should keep two reserved tags for admin queue.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation We found a issue on production environment while using NVMe over RDMA, admin_q reconnect failed forever while remote target and network is ok. After dig into it, we found it may caused by a ABBA deadlock due to tag allocation. In my case, the tag was hold by a keep alive request waiting inside admin_q, as we quiesced admin_q while reset ctrl, so the request maked as idle and will not process before reset success. As fabric_q shares tagset with admin_q, while reconnect remote target, we need a tag for connect command, but the only one reserved tag was held by keep alive command which waiting inside admin_q. As a result, we failed to reconnect admin_q forever. In order to fix this issue, I think we should keep two reserved tags for admin queue.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation We found a issue on production environment while using NVMe over RDMA, admin_q reconnect failed forever while remote target and network is ok. After dig into it, we found it may caused by a ABBA deadlock due to tag allocation. In my case, the tag was hold by a keep alive request waiting inside admin_q, as we quiesced admin_q while reset ctrl, so the request maked as idle and will not process before reset success. As fabric_q shares tagset with admin_q, while reconnect remote target, we need a tag for connect command, but the only one reserved tag was held by keep alive command which waiting inside admin_q. As a result, we failed to reconnect admin_q forever. In order to fix this issue, I think we should keep two reserved tags for admin queue.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-27035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27983 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-31884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-3220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3220 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-27035 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27983 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-31884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437 Référence CVE CVE-2024-33619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0612Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2023-52638 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0546Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27433 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35788 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27401 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae < 149afee5c7418ec5db9d7387b9c9a5c1eb7ea2a8; ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae < ff2f90f88d78559802466ad1c84ac5bda4416b3a; ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae < 6851778504cdb49431809b4ba061903d5f592c96; ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae < 262da920896e2f2ab0e3947d9dbee0aa09045818; ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae < de105068fead55ed5c07ade75e9c8e7f86a00d1d; 5.12
Fixed
< 5.12; 6.1.83 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.23 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.7.11 ≤ 6.7.*; 6.8.2 ≤ 6.8.*; 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 May 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24639
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-27435 · cve.blacktree.nl