BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-27415High confidence

netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack

Linux · Linux

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.25% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.82-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24619

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack conntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing the same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast) frames on bridges. Example: macvlan0 | br0 / \ ethX ethY ethX (or Y) receives a L2 multicast or broadcast packet containing an IP packet, flow is not yet in conntrack table. 1. skb passes through bridge and fake-ip (br_netfilter)Prerouting. -> skb->_nfct now references a unconfirmed entry 2. skb is broad/mcast packet. bridge now passes clones out on each bridge interface. 3. skb gets passed up the stack. 4. In macvlan case, macvlan driver retains clone(s) of the mcast skb and schedules a work queue to send them out on the lower devices. The clone skb->_nfct is not a copy, it is the same entry as the original skb. The macvlan rx handler then returns RX_HANDLER_PASS. 5. Normal conntrack hooks (in NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) confirm the orig skb. The Macvlan broadcast worker and normal confirm path will race. This race will not happen if step 2 already confirmed a clone. In that case later steps perform skb_clone() with skb->_nfct already confirmed (in hash table). This works fine. But such confirmation won't happen when eb/ip/nftables rules dropped the packets before they reached the nf_confirm step in postrouting. Pablo points out that nf_conntrack_bridge doesn't allow use of stateful nat, so we can safely discard the nf_conn entry and let inet call conntrack again. This doesn't work for bridge netfilter: skb could have a nat transformation. Also bridge nf prevents re-invocation of inet prerouting via 'sabotage_in' hook. Work around this problem by explicit confirmation of the entry at LOCAL_IN time, before upper layer has a chance to clone the unconfirmed entry. The downside is that this disables NAT and conntrack helpers. Alternative fix would be to add locking to all code parts that deal with unconfirmed packets, but even if that could be done in a sane way this opens up other problems, for example: -m physdev --physdev-out eth0 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.4 -m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.5 For multicast case, only one of such conflicting mappings will be created, conntrack only handles 1:1 NAT mappings. Users should set create a setup that explicitly marks such traffic NOTRACK (conntrack bypass) to avoid this, but we cannot auto-bypass them, ruleset might have accept rules for untracked traffic already, so user-visible behaviour would change.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack conntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing the same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast) frames on bridges. Example: macvlan0 | br0 / \ ethX ethY ethX (or Y) receives a L2 multicast or broadcast packet containing an IP packet, flow is not yet in conntrack table. 1. skb passes through bridge and fake-ip (br_netfilter)Prerouting. -> skb->_nfct now references a unconfirmed entry 2. skb is broad/mcast packet. bridge now passes clones out on each bridge interface. 3. skb gets passed up the stack. 4. In macvlan case, macvlan driver retains clone(s) of the mcast skb and schedules a work queue to send them out on the lower devices. The clone skb->_nfct is not a copy, it is the same entry as the original skb. The macvlan rx handler then returns RX_HANDLER_PASS. 5. Normal conntrack hooks (in NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) confirm the orig skb. The Macvlan broadcast worker and normal confirm path will race. This race will not happen if step 2 already confirmed a clone. In that case later steps perform skb_clone() with skb->_nfct already confirmed (in hash table). This works fine. But such confirmation won't happen when eb/ip/nftables rules dropped the packets before they reached the nf_confirm step in postrouting. Pablo points out that nf_conntrack_bridge doesn't allow use of stateful nat, so we can safely discard the nf_conn entry and let inet call conntrack again. This doesn't work for bridge netfilter: skb could have a nat transformation. Also bridge nf prevents re-invocation of inet prerouting via 'sabotage_in' hook. Work around this problem by explicit confirmation of the entry at LOCAL_IN time, before upper layer has a chance to clone the unconfirmed entry. The downside is that this disables NAT and conntrack helpers. Alternative fix would be to add locking to all code parts that deal with unconfirmed packets, but even if that could be done in a sane way this opens up other problems, for example: -m physdev --physdev-out eth0 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.4 -m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.5 For multicast case, only one of such conflicting mappings will be created, conntrack only handles 1:1 NAT mappings. Users should set create a setup that explicitly marks such traffic NOTRACK (conntrack bypass) to avoid this, but we cannot auto-bypass them, ruleset might have accept rules for untracked traffic already, so user-visible behaviour would change.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack conntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing the same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast) frames on bridges. Example: macvlan0 | br0 / \ ethX ethY ethX (or Y) receives a L2 multicast or broadcast packet containing an IP packet, flow is not yet in conntrack table. 1. skb passes through bridge and fake-ip (br_netfilter)Prerouting. -> skb->_nfct now references a unconfirmed entry 2. skb is broad/mcast packet. bridge now passes clones out on each bridge interface. 3. skb gets passed up the stack. 4. In macvlan case, macvlan driver retains clone(s) of the mcast skb and schedules a work queue to send them out on the lower devices. The clone skb->_nfct is not a copy, it is the same entry as the original skb. The macvlan rx handler then returns RX_HANDLER_PASS. 5. Normal conntrack hooks (in NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) confirm the orig skb. The Macvlan broadcast worker and normal confirm path will race. This race will not happen if step 2 already confirmed a clone. In that case later steps perform skb_clone() with skb->_nfct already confirmed (in hash table). This works fine. But such confirmation won't happen when eb/ip/nftables rules dropped the packets before they reached the nf_confirm step in postrouting. Pablo points out that nf_conntrack_bridge doesn't allow use of stateful nat, so we can safely discard the nf_conn entry and let inet call conntrack again. This doesn't work for bridge netfilter: skb could have a nat transformation. Also bridge nf prevents re-invocation of inet prerouting via 'sabotage_in' hook. Work around this problem by explicit confirmation of the entry at LOCAL_IN time, before upper layer has a chance to clone the unconfirmed entry. The downside is that this disables NAT and conntrack helpers. Alternative fix would be to add locking to all code parts that deal with unconfirmed packets, but even if that could be done in a sane way this opens up other problems, for example: -m physdev --physdev-out eth0 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.4 -m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.5 For multicast case, only one of such conflicting mappings will be created, conntrack only handles 1:1 NAT mappings. Users should set create a setup that explicitly marks such traffic NOTRACK (conntrack bypass) to avoid this, but we cannot auto-bypass them, ruleset might have accept rules for untracked traffic already, so user-visible behaviour would change.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
UnauthenticatedCWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1293IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Informationen auszuspähen, einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen oder weitere unspezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0482Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520354-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20355-1 du 23 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520355-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20366-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520366-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20367-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520367-1 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0465Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501707-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20349-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520349-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20350-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520350-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20351-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520351-1 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53018 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53023 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46784 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0839Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un contournement de la politique de sécurité, un déni de service et un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0728Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-26581 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0580Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0546Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27391 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27392 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27433 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028364Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 7c3f28599652acf431a2211168de4a583f30b6d5, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 2b1414d5e94e477edff1d2c79030f1d742625ea0, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 80cd0487f630b5382734997c3e5e3003a77db315, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < cb734975b0ffa688ff6cc0eed463865bf07b6c01, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 62e7151ae3eb465e0ab52a20c941ff33bb6332e9, 2.6.12
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.12, 5.15.151 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.81 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.21 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.9 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 May 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24619
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-27415 · cve.blacktree.nl