BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-27405High confidence

usb: gadget: ncm: Avoid dropping datagrams of properly parsed NTBs

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-613116 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 1.30% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.82-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-613116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-613116: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.1
3 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: gadget: ncm: Avoid dropping datagrams of properly parsed NTBs
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24609

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: gadget: ncm: Avoid dropping datagrams of properly parsed NTBs It is observed sometimes when tethering is used over NCM with Windows 11 as host, at some instances, the gadget_giveback has one byte appended at the end of a proper NTB. When the NTB is parsed, unwrap call looks for any leftover bytes in SKB provided by u_ether and if there are any pending bytes, it treats them as a separate NTB and parses it. But in case the second NTB (as per unwrap call) is faulty/corrupt, all the datagrams that were parsed properly in the first NTB and saved in rx_list are dropped. Adding a few custom traces showed the following: [002] d..1 7828.532866: dwc3_gadget_giveback: ep1out: req 000000003868811a length 1025/16384 zsI ==> 0 [002] d..1 7828.532867: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb toprocess: 1025 [002] d..1 7828.532867: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb nth: 1751999342 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb seq: 0xce67 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb blk_len: 0x400 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb ndp_len: 0x10 [002] d..1 7828.532869: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: Parsed NTB with 1 frames In this case, the giveback is of 1025 bytes and block length is 1024. The rest 1 byte (which is 0x00) won't be parsed resulting in drop of all datagrams in rx_list. Same is case with packets of size 2048: [002] d..1 7828.557948: dwc3_gadget_giveback: ep1out: req 0000000011dfd96e length 2049/16384 zsI ==> 0 [002] d..1 7828.557949: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb nth: 1751999342 [002] d..1 7828.557950: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb blk_len: 0x800 Lecroy shows one byte coming in extra confirming that the byte is coming in from PC: Transfer 2959 - Bytes Transferred(1025) Timestamp((18.524 843 590) - Transaction 8391 - Data(1025 bytes) Timestamp(18.524 843 590) --- Packet 4063861 Data(1024 bytes) Duration(2.117us) Idle(14.700ns) Timestamp(18.524 843 590) --- Packet 4063863 Data(1 byte) Duration(66.160ns) Time(282.000ns) Timestamp(18.524 845 722) According to Windows driver, no ZLP is needed if wBlockLength is non-zero, because the non-zero wBlockLength has already told the function side the size of transfer to be expected. However, there are in-market NCM devices that rely on ZLP as long as the wBlockLength is multiple of wMaxPacketSize. To deal with such devices, it pads an extra 0 at end so the transfer is no longer multiple of wMaxPacketSize.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: gadget: ncm: Avoid dropping datagrams of properly parsed NTBs It is observed sometimes when tethering is used over NCM with Windows 11 as host, at some instances, the gadget_giveback has one byte appended at the end of a proper NTB. When the NTB is parsed, unwrap call looks for any leftover bytes in SKB provided by u_ether and if there are any pending bytes, it treats them as a separate NTB and parses it. But in case the second NTB (as per unwrap call) is faulty/corrupt, all the datagrams that were parsed properly in the first NTB and saved in rx_list are dropped. Adding a few custom traces showed the following: [002] d..1 7828.532866: dwc3_gadget_giveback: ep1out: req 000000003868811a length 1025/16384 zsI ==> 0 [002] d..1 7828.532867: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb toprocess: 1025 [002] d..1 7828.532867: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb nth: 1751999342 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb seq: 0xce67 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb blk_len: 0x400 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb ndp_len: 0x10 [002] d..1 7828.532869: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: Parsed NTB with 1 frames In this case, the giveback is of 1025 bytes and block length is 1024. The rest 1 byte (which is 0x00) won't be parsed resulting in drop of all datagrams in rx_list. Same is case with packets of size 2048: [002] d..1 7828.557948: dwc3_gadget_giveback: ep1out: req 0000000011dfd96e length 2049/16384 zsI ==> 0 [002] d..1 7828.557949: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb nth: 1751999342 [002] d..1 7828.557950: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb blk_len: 0x800 Lecroy shows one byte coming in extra confirming that the byte is coming in from PC: Transfer 2959 - Bytes Transferred(1025) Timestamp((18.524 843 590) - Transaction 8391 - Data(1025 bytes) Timestamp(18.524 843 590) --- Packet 4063861 Data(1024 bytes) Duration(2.117us) Idle(14.700ns) Timestamp(18.524 843 590) --- Packet 4063863 Data(1 byte) Duration(66.160ns) Time(282.000ns) Timestamp(18.524 845 722) According to Windows driver, no ZLP is needed if wBlockLength is non-zero, because the non-zero wBlockLength has already told the function side the size of transfer to be expected. However, there are in-market NCM devices that rely on ZLP as long as the wBlockLength is multiple of wMaxPacketSize. To deal with such devices, it pads an extra 0 at end so the transfer is no longer multiple of wMaxPacketSize.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: gadget: ncm: Avoid dropping datagrams of properly parsed NTBs It is observed sometimes when tethering is used over NCM with Windows 11 as host, at some instances, the gadget_giveback has one byte appended at the end of a proper NTB. When the NTB is parsed, unwrap call looks for any leftover bytes in SKB provided by u_ether and if there are any pending bytes, it treats them as a separate NTB and parses it. But in case the second NTB (as per unwrap call) is faulty/corrupt, all the datagrams that were parsed properly in the first NTB and saved in rx_list are dropped. Adding a few custom traces showed the following: [002] d..1 7828.532866: dwc3_gadget_giveback: ep1out: req 000000003868811a length 1025/16384 zsI ==> 0 [002] d..1 7828.532867: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb toprocess: 1025 [002] d..1 7828.532867: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb nth: 1751999342 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb seq: 0xce67 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb blk_len: 0x400 [002] d..1 7828.532868: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb ndp_len: 0x10 [002] d..1 7828.532869: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: Parsed NTB with 1 frames In this case, the giveback is of 1025 bytes and block length is 1024. The rest 1 byte (which is 0x00) won't be parsed resulting in drop of all datagrams in rx_list. Same is case with packets of size 2048: [002] d..1 7828.557948: dwc3_gadget_giveback: ep1out: req 0000000011dfd96e length 2049/16384 zsI ==> 0 [002] d..1 7828.557949: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb nth: 1751999342 [002] d..1 7828.557950: ncm_unwrap_ntb: K: ncm_unwrap_ntb blk_len: 0x800 Lecroy shows one byte coming in extra confirming that the byte is coming in from PC: Transfer 2959 - Bytes Transferred(1025) Timestamp((18.524 843 590) - Transaction 8391 - Data(1025 bytes) Timestamp(18.524 843 590) --- Packet 4063861 Data(1024 bytes) Duration(2.117us) Idle(14.700ns) Timestamp(18.524 843 590) --- Packet 4063863 Data(1 byte) Duration(66.160ns) Time(282.000ns) Timestamp(18.524 845 722) According to Windows driver, no ZLP is needed if wBlockLength is non-zero, because the non-zero wBlockLength has already told the function side the size of transfer to be expected. However, there are in-market NCM devices that rely on ZLP as long as the wBlockLength is multiple of wMaxPacketSize. To deal with such devices, it pads an extra 0 at end so the transfer is no longer multiple of wMaxPacketSize.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1188Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-26801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0580Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0546Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27391 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27392 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0527Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-27076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-021821Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 9f6ce4240a2bf456402c15c06768059e5973f28c < 059285e04ebb273d32323fbad5431c5b94f77e48, 9f6ce4240a2bf456402c15c06768059e5973f28c < a31cf46d108dabce3df80b3e5c07661e24912151, 9f6ce4240a2bf456402c15c06768059e5973f28c < 57ca0e16f393bb21d69734e536e383a3a4c665fd, 9f6ce4240a2bf456402c15c06768059e5973f28c < 2cb66b62a5d64ccf09b0591ab86fb085fa491fc5, 9f6ce4240a2bf456402c15c06768059e5973f28c < 35b604a37ec70d68b19dafd10bbacf1db505c9ca, 9f6ce4240a2bf456402c15c06768059e5973f28c < 2b7ec68869d50ea998908af43b643bca7e54577e, 9f6ce4240a2bf456402c15c06768059e5973f28c < c7f43900bc723203d7554d299a2ce844054fab8e, 9f6ce4240a2bf456402c15c06768059e5973f28c < 76c51146820c5dac629f21deafab0a7039bc3ccd, 2.6.38
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.38, 4.19.308 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.270 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.211 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.150 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.80 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.19 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.7 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 May 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:10 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24609
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-27405 · cve.blacktree.nl