BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-27390High confidence

ipv6: mcast: remove one synchronize_net() barrier in ipv6_mc_down()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 24 Jul 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

15 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 11 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24594

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: mcast: remove one synchronize_net() barrier in ipv6_mc_down() As discussed in the past (commit 2d3916f31891 ("ipv6: fix skb drops in igmp6_event_query() and igmp6_event_report()")) I think the synchronize_net() call in ipv6_mc_down() is not needed. Under load, synchronize_net() can last between 200 usec and 5 ms. KASAN seems to agree as well.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: mcast: remove one synchronize_net() barrier in ipv6_mc_down() As discussed in the past (commit 2d3916f31891 ("ipv6: fix skb drops in igmp6_event_query() and igmp6_event_report()")) I think the synchronize_net() call in ipv6_mc_down() is not needed. Under load, synchronize_net() can last between 200 usec and 5 ms. KASAN seems to agree as well.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: mcast: remove one synchronize_net() barrier in ipv6_mc_down() As discussed in the past (commit 2d3916f31891 ("ipv6: fix skb drops in igmp6_event_query() and igmp6_event_report()")) I think the synchronize_net() call in ipv6_mc_down() is not needed. Under load, synchronize_net() can last between 200 usec and 5 ms. KASAN seems to agree as well.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1008Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder sonstige Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240508Security Bulletin 08 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 May 2024, published on 8 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27023 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27026 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27039 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28757 Référence CVE CVE-2024-3219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3219 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34459 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0580Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0546Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27075 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27076 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27078 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27391 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27392 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27403 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028156Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 94d6a071ab2f26eb18a83109940db0cec19552fd < bfd2f3c58ad86ad33db80515e6c3503e0414e44b, f185de28d9ae6c978135993769352e523ee8df06 < 9d159d6637ccce25f879d662a480541ef4ba3a50, f185de28d9ae6c978135993769352e523ee8df06 < a03ede2282ebbd181bd6f5c38cbfcb5765afcd04, f185de28d9ae6c978135993769352e523ee8df06 < 26d4bac55750d535f1f0b8790dc26daf6089e373, f185de28d9ae6c978135993769352e523ee8df06 < 7eb06ee5921189812e6b4bfe7b0f1e878be16df7, f185de28d9ae6c978135993769352e523ee8df06 < 5da9a218340a2bc804dc4327e5804392e24a0b88, f185de28d9ae6c978135993769352e523ee8df06 < 17ef8efc00b34918b966388b2af0993811895a8c, 5.13
Fixed
Linux: < 5.13, 5.15.153 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.83 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.23 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.11 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8.2 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2024 · Last source change 24 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24594
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-27390 · cve.blacktree.nl