BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-27018High confidence

netfilter: br_netfilter: skip conntrack input hook for promisc packets

Linux · Linux

8.2HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 57 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.64% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 57 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

19 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 15 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.90-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-27018 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: netfilter: br_netfilter: skip conntrack input hook for promisc packets
42 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's `br_netfilter` module. This vulnerability allows packets received on a promiscuous interface to bypass the connection tracking input hook. This bypass could lead to unexpected network behavior or violations of security policies, potentially allowing unauthorized network access or information exposure.
Remediation
Out of support scope
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24280

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 57 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: br_netfilter: skip conntrack input hook for promisc packets For historical reasons, when bridge device is in promisc mode, packets that are directed to the taps follow bridge input hook path. This patch adds a workaround to reset conntrack for these packets. Jianbo Liu reports warning splats in their test infrastructure where cloned packets reach the br_netfilter input hook to confirm the conntrack object. Scratch one bit from BR_INPUT_SKB_CB to annotate that this packet has reached the input hook because it is passed up to the bridge device to reach the taps. [ 57.571874] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c:616 br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.572749] Modules linked in: xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink iptable_nat xt_addrtype xt_conntrack nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss oid_registry overlay rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_isc si ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5ctl mlx5_core [ 57.575158] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.8.0+ #19 [ 57.575700] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 57.576662] RIP: 0010:br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.577195] Code: fe ff ff 41 bd 04 00 00 00 be 04 00 00 00 e9 4a ff ff ff be 04 00 00 00 48 89 ef e8 f3 a9 3c e1 66 83 ad b4 00 00 00 04 eb 91 <0f> 0b e9 f1 fe ff ff 0f 0b e9 df fe ff ff 48 89 df e8 b3 53 47 e1 [ 57.578722] RSP: 0018:ffff88885f845a08 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 57.579207] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88812dfe8000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 57.579830] RDX: ffff88885f845a60 RSI: ffff8881022dc300 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 57.580454] RBP: ffff88885f845a60 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 [ 57.581076] R10: 00000000ffff1300 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 57.581695] R13: ffff8881047ffe00 R14: ffff888108dbee00 R15: ffff88814519b800 [ 57.582313] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88885f840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 57.583040] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 57.583564] CR2: 000000c4206aa000 CR3: 0000000103847001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 [ 57.584194] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 57.584820] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 57.585440] Call Trace: [ 57.585721] <IRQ> [ 57.585976] ? __warn+0x7d/0x130 [ 57.586323] ? br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.586811] ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1c0 [ 57.587177] ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 [ 57.587539] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [ 57.587929] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ 57.588336] ? br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.588825] nf_hook_slow+0x3d/0xd0 [ 57.589188] ? br_handle_vlan+0x4b/0x110 [ 57.589579] br_pass_frame_up+0xfc/0x150 [ 57.589970] ? br_port_flags_change+0x40/0x40 [ 57.590396] br_handle_frame_finish+0x346/0x5e0 [ 57.590837] ? ipt_do_table+0x32e/0x430 [ 57.591221] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.591656] br_nf_hook_thresh+0x4b/0xf0 [br_netfilter] [ 57.592286] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.592802] br_nf_pre_routing_finish+0x178/0x480 [br_netfilter] [ 57.593348] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.593782] ? nf_nat_ipv4_pre_routing+0x25/0x60 [nf_nat] [ 57.594279] br_nf_pre_routing+0x24c/0x550 [br_netfilter] [ 57.594780] ? br_nf_hook_thresh+0xf0/0xf0 [br_netfilter] [ 57.595280] br_handle_frame+0x1f3/0x3d0 [ 57.595676] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.596118] ? br_handle_frame_finish+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 57.596566] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x25b/0xfc0 [ 57.597017] ? __napi_build_skb+0x37/0x40 [ 57.597418] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0xfb/0x220

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: br_netfilter: skip conntrack input hook for promisc packets For historical reasons, when bridge device is in promisc mode, packets that are directed to the taps follow bridge input hook path. This patch adds a workaround to reset conntrack for these packets. Jianbo Liu reports warning splats in their test infrastructure where cloned packets reach the br_netfilter input hook to confirm the conntrack object. Scratch one bit from BR_INPUT_SKB_CB to annotate that this packet has reached the input hook because it is passed up to the bridge device to reach the taps. [ 57.571874] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c:616 br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.572749] Modules linked in: xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink iptable_nat xt_addrtype xt_conntrack nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss oid_registry overlay rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_isc si ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5ctl mlx5_core [ 57.575158] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.8.0+ #19 [ 57.575700] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 57.576662] RIP: 0010:br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.577195] Code: fe ff ff 41 bd 04 00 00 00 be 04 00 00 00 e9 4a ff ff ff be 04 00 00 00 48 89 ef e8 f3 a9 3c e1 66 83 ad b4 00 00 00 04 eb 91 <0f> 0b e9 f1 fe ff ff 0f 0b e9 df fe ff ff 48 89 df e8 b3 53 47 e1 [ 57.578722] RSP: 0018:ffff88885f845a08 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 57.579207] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88812dfe8000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 57.579830] RDX: ffff88885f845a60 RSI: ffff8881022dc300 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 57.580454] RBP: ffff88885f845a60 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 [ 57.581076] R10: 00000000ffff1300 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 57.581695] R13: ffff8881047ffe00 R14: ffff888108dbee00 R15: ffff88814519b800 [ 57.582313] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88885f840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 57.583040] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 57.583564] CR2: 000000c4206aa000 CR3: 0000000103847001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 [ 57.584194] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 57.584820] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 57.585440] Call Trace: [ 57.585721] <IRQ> [ 57.585976] ? __warn+0x7d/0x130 [ 57.586323] ? br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.586811] ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1c0 [ 57.587177] ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 [ 57.587539] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [ 57.587929] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ 57.588336] ? br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.588825] nf_hook_slow+0x3d/0xd0 [ 57.589188] ? br_handle_vlan+0x4b/0x110 [ 57.589579] br_pass_frame_up+0xfc/0x150 [ 57.589970] ? br_port_flags_change+0x40/0x40 [ 57.590396] br_handle_frame_finish+0x346/0x5e0 [ 57.590837] ? ipt_do_table+0x32e/0x430 [ 57.591221] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.591656] br_nf_hook_thresh+0x4b/0xf0 [br_netfilter] [ 57.592286] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.592802] br_nf_pre_routing_finish+0x178/0x480 [br_netfilter] [ 57.593348] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.593782] ? nf_nat_ipv4_pre_routing+0x25/0x60 [nf_nat] [ 57.594279] br_nf_pre_routing+0x24c/0x550 [br_netfilter] [ 57.594780] ? br_nf_hook_thresh+0xf0/0xf0 [br_netfilter] [ 57.595280] br_handle_frame+0x1f3/0x3d0 [ 57.595676] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.596118] ? br_handle_frame_finish+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 57.596566] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x25b/0xfc0 [ 57.597017] ? __napi_build_skb+0x37/0x40 [ 57.597418] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0xfb/0x220

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: br_netfilter: skip conntrack input hook for promisc packets For historical reasons, when bridge device is in promisc mode, packets that are directed to the taps follow bridge input hook path. This patch adds a workaround to reset conntrack for these packets. Jianbo Liu reports warning splats in their test infrastructure where cloned packets reach the br_netfilter input hook to confirm the conntrack object. Scratch one bit from BR_INPUT_SKB_CB to annotate that this packet has reached the input hook because it is passed up to the bridge device to reach the taps. [ 57.571874] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c:616 br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.572749] Modules linked in: xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink iptable_nat xt_addrtype xt_conntrack nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss oid_registry overlay rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_isc si ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5ctl mlx5_core [ 57.575158] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.8.0+ #19 [ 57.575700] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 57.576662] RIP: 0010:br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.577195] Code: fe ff ff 41 bd 04 00 00 00 be 04 00 00 00 e9 4a ff ff ff be 04 00 00 00 48 89 ef e8 f3 a9 3c e1 66 83 ad b4 00 00 00 04 eb 91 <0f> 0b e9 f1 fe ff ff 0f 0b e9 df fe ff ff 48 89 df e8 b3 53 47 e1 [ 57.578722] RSP: 0018:ffff88885f845a08 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 57.579207] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88812dfe8000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 57.579830] RDX: ffff88885f845a60 RSI: ffff8881022dc300 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 57.580454] RBP: ffff88885f845a60 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 [ 57.581076] R10: 00000000ffff1300 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 57.581695] R13: ffff8881047ffe00 R14: ffff888108dbee00 R15: ffff88814519b800 [ 57.582313] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88885f840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 57.583040] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 57.583564] CR2: 000000c4206aa000 CR3: 0000000103847001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 [ 57.584194] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 57.584820] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 57.585440] Call Trace: [ 57.585721] <IRQ> [ 57.585976] ? __warn+0x7d/0x130 [ 57.586323] ? br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.586811] ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1c0 [ 57.587177] ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 [ 57.587539] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [ 57.587929] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ 57.588336] ? br_nf_local_in+0x157/0x180 [br_netfilter] [ 57.588825] nf_hook_slow+0x3d/0xd0 [ 57.589188] ? br_handle_vlan+0x4b/0x110 [ 57.589579] br_pass_frame_up+0xfc/0x150 [ 57.589970] ? br_port_flags_change+0x40/0x40 [ 57.590396] br_handle_frame_finish+0x346/0x5e0 [ 57.590837] ? ipt_do_table+0x32e/0x430 [ 57.591221] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.591656] br_nf_hook_thresh+0x4b/0xf0 [br_netfilter] [ 57.592286] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.592802] br_nf_pre_routing_finish+0x178/0x480 [br_netfilter] [ 57.593348] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.593782] ? nf_nat_ipv4_pre_routing+0x25/0x60 [nf_nat] [ 57.594279] br_nf_pre_routing+0x24c/0x550 [br_netfilter] [ 57.594780] ? br_nf_hook_thresh+0xf0/0xf0 [br_netfilter] [ 57.595280] br_handle_frame+0x1f3/0x3d0 [ 57.595676] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [ 57.596118] ? br_handle_frame_finish+0x5e0/0x5e0 [ 57.596566] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x25b/0xfc0 [ 57.597017] ? __napi_build_skb+0x37/0x40 [ 57.597418] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0xfb/0x220

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1008Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder sonstige Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240508Security Bulletin 08 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 May 2024, published on 8 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26873 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0482Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

su-202520370-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20354-1 du 23 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520354-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20355-1 du 23 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520355-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20366-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520366-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20367-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520367-1 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0465Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

su-202520344-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01707-1 du 26 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501707-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20349-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520349-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20350-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520350-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20351-1 du 28 mai 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520351-1 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53014 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53018 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53023 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46784 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27024 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27024 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-27009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27021 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27024 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0381Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-27002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27024 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-003217Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.8, 5.15.157 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.88 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.29 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.8 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24280
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24280↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-27018 · cve.blacktree.nl