BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26924High confidence

netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 15 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.85% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 15 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.90-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.8.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2024-26924 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 154 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-26924
114 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo: add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms ... add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added ... add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms 1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X Then, KASAN shows a splat. Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a rule that maps to a non-deactivated element. Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation. Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map. The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one element that share the same key. This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing key has timed out or is not active in the next generation. In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element. If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes unreachable. The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale pointer). Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step. If not, we need to continue searching. Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent element. v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-613116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-613116: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.1
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo: add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms ... add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added ... add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms 1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X Then, KASAN shows a splat. Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a rule that maps to a non-deactivated element. Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation. Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map. The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one element that share the same key. This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing key has timed out or is not active in the next generation. In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element. If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes unreachable. The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale pointer). Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step. If not, we need to continue searching. Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent element. v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)
Remediation
Update to V3.1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24186

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 15 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo: add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms ... add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added ... add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms 1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X Then, KASAN shows a splat. Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a rule that maps to a non-deactivated element. Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation. Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map. The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one element that share the same key. This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing key has timed out or is not active in the next generation. In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element. If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes unreachable. The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale pointer). Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step. If not, we need to continue searching. Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent element. v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo: add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms ... add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added ... add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms 1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X Then, KASAN shows a splat. Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a rule that maps to a non-deactivated element. Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation. Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map. The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one element that share the same key. This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing key has timed out or is not active in the next generation. In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element. If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes unreachable. The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale pointer). Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step. If not, we need to continue searching. Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent element. v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo: add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms ... add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added ... add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms 1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X Then, KASAN shows a splat. Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a rule that maps to a non-deactivated element. Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation. Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map. The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one element that share the same key. This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing key has timed out or is not active in the next generation. In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element. If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes unreachable. The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale pointer). Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step. If not, we need to continue searching. Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent element. v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1293IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Informationen auszuspähen, einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen oder weitere unspezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0964Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240501Security Bulletin 01 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 01 May 2024, published on 1 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-26859 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53676 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53717 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53727 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53728 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53729 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53730 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53731 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2023-3111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26586 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26762 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26762 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0401Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Secure Analytics

ord?id=CVE-2024-12085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-1488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1488 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21208 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21210 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21217 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21235 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-32007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26708 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27054 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0153Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0106Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-10978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-10979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-22353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22353 Référence CVE CVE-2024-22354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22354 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25026 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27268 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26596 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27029 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0071Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-24860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2023-6546 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

umentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:8856 du 05 novembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8856 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:8870 du 05 novembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8870 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48936 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52492 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26909 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-269355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?i

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-269355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?i

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26919 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0580Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27024 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27037 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0546Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0527Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-26900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0381Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-26901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-020781Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.6, 5.10.216 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.157 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.88 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.29 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.8.8 ≤ 6.8.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Apr 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24186
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26924 · cve.blacktree.nl