BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26853High confidence

igc: avoid returning frame twice in XDP_REDIRECT

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.63% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.82-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24115

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: igc: avoid returning frame twice in XDP_REDIRECT When a frame can not be transmitted in XDP_REDIRECT (e.g. due to a full queue), it is necessary to free it by calling xdp_return_frame_rx_napi. However, this is the responsibility of the caller of the ndo_xdp_xmit (see for example bq_xmit_all in kernel/bpf/devmap.c) and thus calling it inside igc_xdp_xmit (which is the ndo_xdp_xmit of the igc driver) as well will lead to memory corruption. In fact, bq_xmit_all expects that it can return all frames after the last successfully transmitted one. Therefore, break for the first not transmitted frame, but do not call xdp_return_frame_rx_napi in igc_xdp_xmit. This is equally implemented in other Intel drivers such as the igb. There are two alternatives to this that were rejected: 1. Return num_frames as all the frames would have been transmitted and release them inside igc_xdp_xmit. While it might work technically, it is not what the return value is meant to represent (i.e. the number of SUCCESSFULLY transmitted packets). 2. Rework kernel/bpf/devmap.c and all drivers to support non-consecutively dropped packets. Besides being complex, it likely has a negative performance impact without a significant gain since it is anyway unlikely that the next frame can be transmitted if the previous one was dropped. The memory corruption can be reproduced with the following script which leads to a kernel panic after a few seconds. It basically generates more traffic than a i225 NIC can transmit and pushes it via XDP_REDIRECT from a virtual interface to the physical interface where frames get dropped. #!/bin/bash INTERFACE=enp4s0 INTERFACE_IDX=`cat /sys/class/net/$INTERFACE/ifindex` sudo ip link add dev veth1 type veth peer name veth2 sudo ip link set up $INTERFACE sudo ip link set up veth1 sudo ip link set up veth2 cat << EOF > redirect.bpf.c SEC("prog") int redirect(struct xdp_md *ctx) { return bpf_redirect($INTERFACE_IDX, 0); } char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; EOF clang -O2 -g -Wall -target bpf -c redirect.bpf.c -o redirect.bpf.o sudo ip link set veth2 xdp obj redirect.bpf.o cat << EOF > pass.bpf.c SEC("prog") int pass(struct xdp_md *ctx) { return XDP_PASS; } char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; EOF clang -O2 -g -Wall -target bpf -c pass.bpf.c -o pass.bpf.o sudo ip link set $INTERFACE xdp obj pass.bpf.o cat << EOF > trafgen.cfg { /* Ethernet Header */ 0xe8, 0x6a, 0x64, 0x41, 0xbf, 0x46, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, const16(ETH_P_IP), /* IPv4 Header */ 0b01000101, 0, # IPv4 version, IHL, TOS const16(1028), # IPv4 total length (UDP length + 20 bytes (IP header)) const16(2), # IPv4 ident 0b01000000, 0, # IPv4 flags, fragmentation off 64, # IPv4 TTL 17, # Protocol UDP csumip(14, 33), # IPv4 checksum /* UDP Header */ 10, 0, 1, 1, # IP Src - adapt as needed 10, 0, 1, 2, # IP Dest - adapt as needed const16(6666), # UDP Src Port const16(6666), # UDP Dest Port const16(1008), # UDP length (UDP header 8 bytes + payload length) csumudp(14, 34), # UDP checksum /* Payload */ fill('W', 1000), } EOF sudo trafgen -i trafgen.cfg -b3000MB -o veth1 --cpp

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: igc: avoid returning frame twice in XDP_REDIRECT When a frame can not be transmitted in XDP_REDIRECT (e.g. due to a full queue), it is necessary to free it by calling xdp_return_frame_rx_napi. However, this is the responsibility of the caller of the ndo_xdp_xmit (see for example bq_xmit_all in kernel/bpf/devmap.c) and thus calling it inside igc_xdp_xmit (which is the ndo_xdp_xmit of the igc driver) as well will lead to memory corruption. In fact, bq_xmit_all expects that it can return all frames after the last successfully transmitted one. Therefore, break for the first not transmitted frame, but do not call xdp_return_frame_rx_napi in igc_xdp_xmit. This is equally implemented in other Intel drivers such as the igb. There are two alternatives to this that were rejected: 1. Return num_frames as all the frames would have been transmitted and release them inside igc_xdp_xmit. While it might work technically, it is not what the return value is meant to represent (i.e. the number of SUCCESSFULLY transmitted packets). 2. Rework kernel/bpf/devmap.c and all drivers to support non-consecutively dropped packets. Besides being complex, it likely has a negative performance impact without a significant gain since it is anyway unlikely that the next frame can be transmitted if the previous one was dropped. The memory corruption can be reproduced with the following script which leads to a kernel panic after a few seconds. It basically generates more traffic than a i225 NIC can transmit and pushes it via XDP_REDIRECT from a virtual interface to the physical interface where frames get dropped. #!/bin/bash INTERFACE=enp4s0 INTERFACE_IDX=`cat /sys/class/net/$INTERFACE/ifindex` sudo ip link add dev veth1 type veth peer name veth2 sudo ip link set up $INTERFACE sudo ip link set up veth1 sudo ip link set up veth2 cat << EOF > redirect.bpf.c SEC("prog") int redirect(struct xdp_md *ctx) { return bpf_redirect($INTERFACE_IDX, 0); } char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; EOF clang -O2 -g -Wall -target bpf -c redirect.bpf.c -o redirect.bpf.o sudo ip link set veth2 xdp obj redirect.bpf.o cat << EOF > pass.bpf.c SEC("prog") int pass(struct xdp_md *ctx) { return XDP_PASS; } char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; EOF clang -O2 -g -Wall -target bpf -c pass.bpf.c -o pass.bpf.o sudo ip link set $INTERFACE xdp obj pass.bpf.o cat << EOF > trafgen.cfg { /* Ethernet Header */ 0xe8, 0x6a, 0x64, 0x41, 0xbf, 0x46, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, const16(ETH_P_IP), /* IPv4 Header */ 0b01000101, 0, # IPv4 version, IHL, TOS const16(1028), # IPv4 total length (UDP length + 20 bytes (IP header)) const16(2), # IPv4 ident 0b01000000, 0, # IPv4 flags, fragmentation off 64, # IPv4 TTL 17, # Protocol UDP csumip(14, 33), # IPv4 checksum /* UDP Header */ 10, 0, 1, 1, # IP Src - adapt as needed 10, 0, 1, 2, # IP Dest - adapt as needed const16(6666), # UDP Src Port const16(6666), # UDP Dest Port const16(1008), # UDP length (UDP header 8 bytes + payload length) csumudp(14, 34), # UDP checksum /* Payload */ fill('W', 1000), } EOF sudo trafgen -i trafgen.cfg -b3000MB -o veth1 --cpp

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: igc: avoid returning frame twice in XDP_REDIRECT When a frame can not be transmitted in XDP_REDIRECT (e.g. due to a full queue), it is necessary to free it by calling xdp_return_frame_rx_napi. However, this is the responsibility of the caller of the ndo_xdp_xmit (see for example bq_xmit_all in kernel/bpf/devmap.c) and thus calling it inside igc_xdp_xmit (which is the ndo_xdp_xmit of the igc driver) as well will lead to memory corruption. In fact, bq_xmit_all expects that it can return all frames after the last successfully transmitted one. Therefore, break for the first not transmitted frame, but do not call xdp_return_frame_rx_napi in igc_xdp_xmit. This is equally implemented in other Intel drivers such as the igb. There are two alternatives to this that were rejected: 1. Return num_frames as all the frames would have been transmitted and release them inside igc_xdp_xmit. While it might work technically, it is not what the return value is meant to represent (i.e. the number of SUCCESSFULLY transmitted packets). 2. Rework kernel/bpf/devmap.c and all drivers to support non-consecutively dropped packets. Besides being complex, it likely has a negative performance impact without a significant gain since it is anyway unlikely that the next frame can be transmitted if the previous one was dropped. The memory corruption can be reproduced with the following script which leads to a kernel panic after a few seconds. It basically generates more traffic than a i225 NIC can transmit and pushes it via XDP_REDIRECT from a virtual interface to the physical interface where frames get dropped. #!/bin/bash INTERFACE=enp4s0 INTERFACE_IDX=`cat /sys/class/net/$INTERFACE/ifindex` sudo ip link add dev veth1 type veth peer name veth2 sudo ip link set up $INTERFACE sudo ip link set up veth1 sudo ip link set up veth2 cat << EOF > redirect.bpf.c SEC("prog") int redirect(struct xdp_md *ctx) { return bpf_redirect($INTERFACE_IDX, 0); } char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; EOF clang -O2 -g -Wall -target bpf -c redirect.bpf.c -o redirect.bpf.o sudo ip link set veth2 xdp obj redirect.bpf.o cat << EOF > pass.bpf.c SEC("prog") int pass(struct xdp_md *ctx) { return XDP_PASS; } char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; EOF clang -O2 -g -Wall -target bpf -c pass.bpf.c -o pass.bpf.o sudo ip link set $INTERFACE xdp obj pass.bpf.o cat << EOF > trafgen.cfg { /* Ethernet Header */ 0xe8, 0x6a, 0x64, 0x41, 0xbf, 0x46, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, const16(ETH_P_IP), /* IPv4 Header */ 0b01000101, 0, # IPv4 version, IHL, TOS const16(1028), # IPv4 total length (UDP length + 20 bytes (IP header)) const16(2), # IPv4 ident 0b01000000, 0, # IPv4 flags, fragmentation off 64, # IPv4 TTL 17, # Protocol UDP csumip(14, 33), # IPv4 checksum /* UDP Header */ 10, 0, 1, 1, # IP Src - adapt as needed 10, 0, 1, 2, # IP Dest - adapt as needed const16(6666), # UDP Src Port const16(6666), # UDP Dest Port const16(1008), # UDP length (UDP header 8 bytes + payload length) csumudp(14, 34), # UDP checksum /* Payload */ fill('W', 1000), } EOF sudo trafgen -i trafgen.cfg -b3000MB -o veth1 --cpp

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1913Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0920Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240424Security Bulletin 24 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 Apr 2024, published on 24 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-26756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-26756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26869 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26954 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0855Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper Networks

cord?id=CVE-2024-2236 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24806 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26327 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27049 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27052 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27280 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27281 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-26824 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26822 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26832 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0695Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-26600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-26772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26908 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26832 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26848 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0420Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26825 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26833 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26848 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-022297Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 4ff3203610928cac82d5627ce803559e78d61b91 < 63a3c1f3c9ecc654d851e7906d05334cd0c236e2, 4ff3203610928cac82d5627ce803559e78d61b91 < 8df393af9e7e8dfd62e9c41dbaa4d2ff53bf794a, 4ff3203610928cac82d5627ce803559e78d61b91 < 1b3b8231386a572bac8cd5b6fd7e944b84f9bb1f, 4ff3203610928cac82d5627ce803559e78d61b91 < ef27f655b438bed4c83680e4f01e1cde2739854b, 5.13
Fixed
Linux: < 5.13, 6.1.82 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.22 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.10 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 Apr 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24115
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26853 · cve.blacktree.nl