BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26792High confidence

btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24054

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem. The steps that lead to this: 1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(); 3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking; 5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1. Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace: ------------[ cut here ]------------ ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000 RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246 FS: 00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346 create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837 create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404 create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848 btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998 btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393 btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9 Code: 28 00 00 00 (...) RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9 RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658 </TASK> Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change may not fix the case triggered by sy ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem. The steps that lead to this: 1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(); 3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking; 5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1. Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace: ------------[ cut here ]------------ ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000 RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246 FS: 00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346 create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837 create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404 create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848 btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998 btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393 btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9 Code: 28 00 00 00 (...) RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9 RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658 </TASK> Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change may not fix the case triggered by sy ---truncated---

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem. The steps that lead to this: 1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(); 3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking; 5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1. Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace: ------------[ cut here ]------------ ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000 RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246 FS: 00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346 create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837 create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404 create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848 btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998 btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393 btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9 Code: 28 00 00 00 (...) RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9 RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658 </TASK> Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change may not fix the case triggered by sy ---truncated---

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Double Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-415 ↗

CWE-415: Double Free. The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-415
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0773Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, seine Privilegien eskalieren oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240410Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024, published on 10 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26818 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26824 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0580Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0546Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0420Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26773 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26816 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26817 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0334Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-26779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26781 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26789 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-015412Linux の Linux Kernel における二重解放に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、二重解放に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 66b317a2fc45b2ef66527ee3f8fa08fb5beab88d < c34adc20b91a8e55e048b18d63f4f4ae003ecf8f, 833775656d447c545133a744a0ed1e189ce61430 < eb3441093aad251418921246fc3b224fd1575701, 5a172344bfdabb46458e03708735d7b1a918c468 < c8ab7521665bd0f8bc4a900244d1d5a7095cc3b9, e03ee2fe873eb68c1f9ba5112fee70303ebf9dfb < e2b54eaf28df0c978626c9736b94f003b523b451, 3f5d47eb163bceb1b9e613c9003bae5fefc0046f, e31546b0f34af21738c4ceac47d662c00ee6382f, 5.10.210 < 5.11, 5.15.149 < 5.16, 6.1.79 < 6.1.81, 6.6.18 < 6.6.21, 6.7.6 < 6.7.9
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Apr 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC · CWE-415 · Double Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24054
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26792 · cve.blacktree.nl