BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26785High confidence

iommufd: Fix protection fault in iommufd_test_syz_conv_iova

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24047

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommufd: Fix protection fault in iommufd_test_syz_conv_iova Syzkaller reported the following bug: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000038: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000001c0-0x00000000000001c7] Call Trace: lock_acquire lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x4f0 down_read+0x93/0x4a0 iommufd_test_syz_conv_iova+0x56/0x1f0 iommufd_test_access_rw.isra.0+0x2ec/0x390 iommufd_test+0x1058/0x1e30 iommufd_fops_ioctl+0x381/0x510 vfs_ioctl __do_sys_ioctl __se_sys_ioctl __x64_sys_ioctl+0x170/0x1e0 do_syscall_x64 do_syscall_64+0x71/0x140 This is because the new iommufd_access_change_ioas() sets access->ioas to NULL during its process, so the lock might be gone in a concurrent racing context. Fix this by doing the same access->ioas sanity as iommufd_access_rw() and iommufd_access_pin_pages() functions do.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommufd: Fix protection fault in iommufd_test_syz_conv_iova Syzkaller reported the following bug: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000038: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000001c0-0x00000000000001c7] Call Trace: lock_acquire lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x4f0 down_read+0x93/0x4a0 iommufd_test_syz_conv_iova+0x56/0x1f0 iommufd_test_access_rw.isra.0+0x2ec/0x390 iommufd_test+0x1058/0x1e30 iommufd_fops_ioctl+0x381/0x510 vfs_ioctl __do_sys_ioctl __se_sys_ioctl __x64_sys_ioctl+0x170/0x1e0 do_syscall_x64 do_syscall_64+0x71/0x140 This is because the new iommufd_access_change_ioas() sets access->ioas to NULL during its process, so the lock might be gone in a concurrent racing context. Fix this by doing the same access->ioas sanity as iommufd_access_rw() and iommufd_access_pin_pages() functions do.

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommufd: Fix protection fault in iommufd_test_syz_conv_iova Syzkaller reported the following bug: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000038: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000001c0-0x00000000000001c7] Call Trace: lock_acquire lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x4f0 down_read+0x93/0x4a0 iommufd_test_syz_conv_iova+0x56/0x1f0 iommufd_test_access_rw.isra.0+0x2ec/0x390 iommufd_test+0x1058/0x1e30 iommufd_fops_ioctl+0x381/0x510 vfs_ioctl __do_sys_ioctl __se_sys_ioctl __x64_sys_ioctl+0x170/0x1e0 do_syscall_x64 do_syscall_64+0x71/0x140 This is because the new iommufd_access_change_ioas() sets access->ioas to NULL during its process, so the lock might be gone in a concurrent racing context. Fix this by doing the same access->ioas sanity as iommufd_access_rw() and iommufd_access_pin_pages() functions do.

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-120 ↗

CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'). The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-120
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0773Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, seine Privilegien eskalieren oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240410Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024, published on 10 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26764 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26774 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26794 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0669Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-021917Linux の Linux Kernel における古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 9227da7816dd1a42e20d41e2244cb63c205477ca < fd4d5cd7a2e8f08357c9bfc0905957cffe8ce568, 9227da7816dd1a42e20d41e2244cb63c205477ca < fc719ecbca45c9c046640d72baddba3d83e0bc0b, 9227da7816dd1a42e20d41e2244cb63c205477ca < cf7c2789822db8b5efa34f5ebcf1621bc0008d48, 6.6
Fixed
Linux: < 6.6, 6.6.55 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.9 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Apr 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:04 UTC · CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24047
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26785 · cve.blacktree.nl