BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26750High confidence

af_unix: Drop oob_skb ref before purging queue in GC.

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.82-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24012

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Drop oob_skb ref before purging queue in GC. syzbot reported another task hung in __unix_gc(). [0] The current while loop assumes that all of the left candidates have oob_skb and calling kfree_skb(oob_skb) releases the remaining candidates. However, I missed a case that oob_skb has self-referencing fd and another fd and the latter sk is placed before the former in the candidate list. Then, the while loop never proceeds, resulting the task hung. __unix_gc() has the same loop just before purging the collected skb, so we can call kfree_skb(oob_skb) there and let __skb_queue_purge() release all inflight sockets. [0]: Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1: NMI backtrace for cpu 1 CPU: 1 PID: 2784 Comm: kworker/u4:8 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-01028-g71b605d32017 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x0/0x70 kernel/kcov.c:200 Code: 89 fb e8 23 00 00 00 48 8b 3d 84 f5 1a 0c 48 89 de 5b e9 43 26 57 00 0f 1f 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 <f3> 0f 1e fa 48 8b 04 24 65 48 8b 0d 90 52 70 7e 65 8b 15 91 52 70 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000a17fa78 EFLAGS: 00000287 RAX: ffffffff8a0a6108 RBX: ffff88802b6c2640 RCX: ffff88802c0b3b80 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000a17fbf0 R08: ffffffff89383f1d R09: 1ffff1100ee5ff84 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100ee5ff85 R12: 1ffff110056d84ee R13: ffffc9000a17fae0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffff8f47b840 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffef5687ff8 CR3: 0000000029b34000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <NMI> </NMI> <TASK> __unix_gc+0xe69/0xf40 net/unix/garbage.c:343 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2633 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0x913/0x1420 kernel/workqueue.c:2706 worker_thread+0xa5f/0x1000 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x2ef/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Drop oob_skb ref before purging queue in GC. syzbot reported another task hung in __unix_gc(). [0] The current while loop assumes that all of the left candidates have oob_skb and calling kfree_skb(oob_skb) releases the remaining candidates. However, I missed a case that oob_skb has self-referencing fd and another fd and the latter sk is placed before the former in the candidate list. Then, the while loop never proceeds, resulting the task hung. __unix_gc() has the same loop just before purging the collected skb, so we can call kfree_skb(oob_skb) there and let __skb_queue_purge() release all inflight sockets. [0]: Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1: NMI backtrace for cpu 1 CPU: 1 PID: 2784 Comm: kworker/u4:8 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-01028-g71b605d32017 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x0/0x70 kernel/kcov.c:200 Code: 89 fb e8 23 00 00 00 48 8b 3d 84 f5 1a 0c 48 89 de 5b e9 43 26 57 00 0f 1f 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 <f3> 0f 1e fa 48 8b 04 24 65 48 8b 0d 90 52 70 7e 65 8b 15 91 52 70 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000a17fa78 EFLAGS: 00000287 RAX: ffffffff8a0a6108 RBX: ffff88802b6c2640 RCX: ffff88802c0b3b80 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000a17fbf0 R08: ffffffff89383f1d R09: 1ffff1100ee5ff84 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100ee5ff85 R12: 1ffff110056d84ee R13: ffffc9000a17fae0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffff8f47b840 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffef5687ff8 CR3: 0000000029b34000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <NMI> </NMI> <TASK> __unix_gc+0xe69/0xf40 net/unix/garbage.c:343 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2633 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0x913/0x1420 kernel/workqueue.c:2706 worker_thread+0xa5f/0x1000 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x2ef/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Drop oob_skb ref before purging queue in GC. syzbot reported another task hung in __unix_gc(). [0] The current while loop assumes that all of the left candidates have oob_skb and calling kfree_skb(oob_skb) releases the remaining candidates. However, I missed a case that oob_skb has self-referencing fd and another fd and the latter sk is placed before the former in the candidate list. Then, the while loop never proceeds, resulting the task hung. __unix_gc() has the same loop just before purging the collected skb, so we can call kfree_skb(oob_skb) there and let __skb_queue_purge() release all inflight sockets. [0]: Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1: NMI backtrace for cpu 1 CPU: 1 PID: 2784 Comm: kworker/u4:8 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-01028-g71b605d32017 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x0/0x70 kernel/kcov.c:200 Code: 89 fb e8 23 00 00 00 48 8b 3d 84 f5 1a 0c 48 89 de 5b e9 43 26 57 00 0f 1f 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 <f3> 0f 1e fa 48 8b 04 24 65 48 8b 0d 90 52 70 7e 65 8b 15 91 52 70 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000a17fa78 EFLAGS: 00000287 RAX: ffffffff8a0a6108 RBX: ffff88802b6c2640 RCX: ffff88802c0b3b80 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000a17fbf0 R08: ffffffff89383f1d R09: 1ffff1100ee5ff84 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100ee5ff85 R12: 1ffff110056d84ee R13: ffffc9000a17fae0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffff8f47b840 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffef5687ff8 CR3: 0000000029b34000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <NMI> </NMI> <TASK> __unix_gc+0xe69/0xf40 net/unix/garbage.c:343 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2633 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0x913/0x1420 kernel/workqueue.c:2706 worker_thread+0xa5f/0x1000 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x2ef/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0773Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, seine Privilegien eskalieren oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240410Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024, published on 10 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0645Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26743 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26747 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-0090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-0091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0091 Référence CVE CVE-2024-0092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26482 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0580Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26743 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26747 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0546Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26743 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26747 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0334Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26741 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26743 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26745 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26747 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26753 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-020635Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 36f7371de977f805750748e80279be7e370df85c < 6c480d0f131862645d172ca9e25dc152b1a5c3a6, 2a3d40b4025fcfe51b04924979f1653993b17669 < c4c795b21dd23d9514ae1c6646c3fb2c78b5be60, 69e0f04460f4037e01e29f0d9675544f62aafca3 < e9eac260369d0cf57ea53df95427125725507a0d, cb8890318dde26fc89c6ea67d6e9070ab50b6e91 < 43ba9e331559a30000c862eea313248707afa787, 25236c91b5ab4a26a56ba2e79b8060cf4e047839 < aa82ac51d63328714645c827775d64dbfd9941f3, 5.15.149 < 5.15.151
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Apr 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:03 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24012
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26750 · cve.blacktree.nl