BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26740High confidence

net/sched: act_mirred: use the backlog for mirred ingress

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-24002

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_mirred: use the backlog for mirred ingress The test Davide added in commit ca22da2fbd69 ("act_mirred: use the backlog for nested calls to mirred ingress") hangs our testing VMs every 10 or so runs, with the familiar tcp_v4_rcv -> tcp_v4_rcv deadlock reported by lockdep. The problem as previously described by Davide (see Link) is that if we reverse flow of traffic with the redirect (egress -> ingress) we may reach the same socket which generated the packet. And we may still be holding its socket lock. The common solution to such deadlocks is to put the packet in the Rx backlog, rather than run the Rx path inline. Do that for all egress -> ingress reversals, not just once we started to nest mirred calls. In the past there was a concern that the backlog indirection will lead to loss of error reporting / less accurate stats. But the current workaround does not seem to address the issue.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_mirred: use the backlog for mirred ingress The test Davide added in commit ca22da2fbd69 ("act_mirred: use the backlog for nested calls to mirred ingress") hangs our testing VMs every 10 or so runs, with the familiar tcp_v4_rcv -> tcp_v4_rcv deadlock reported by lockdep. The problem as previously described by Davide (see Link) is that if we reverse flow of traffic with the redirect (egress -> ingress) we may reach the same socket which generated the packet. And we may still be holding its socket lock. The common solution to such deadlocks is to put the packet in the Rx backlog, rather than run the Rx path inline. Do that for all egress -> ingress reversals, not just once we started to nest mirred calls. In the past there was a concern that the backlog indirection will lead to loss of error reporting / less accurate stats. But the current workaround does not seem to address the issue.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_mirred: use the backlog for mirred ingress The test Davide added in commit ca22da2fbd69 ("act_mirred: use the backlog for nested calls to mirred ingress") hangs our testing VMs every 10 or so runs, with the familiar tcp_v4_rcv -> tcp_v4_rcv deadlock reported by lockdep. The problem as previously described by Davide (see Link) is that if we reverse flow of traffic with the redirect (egress -> ingress) we may reach the same socket which generated the packet. And we may still be holding its socket lock. The common solution to such deadlocks is to put the packet in the Rx backlog, rather than run the Rx path inline. Do that for all egress -> ingress reversals, not just once we started to nest mirred calls. In the past there was a concern that the backlog indirection will lead to loss of error reporting / less accurate stats. But the current workaround does not seem to address the issue.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1293IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Informationen auszuspähen, einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen oder weitere unspezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1913Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0773Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, seine Privilegien eskalieren oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240410Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024, published on 10 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26717 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-26648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26699 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26719 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-26648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26699 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26719 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0279Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2023-44487 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45142 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45857 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52455 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52467 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52605 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27281 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-26707 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26710 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26713 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26718 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26721 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26727 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26818 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26820 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-26614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26715 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760 Référence CVE CVE-2024-267600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-020627Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 53592b3640019f2834701093e38272fdfd367ad8 < 7c787888d164689da8b1b115f3ef562c1e843af4, 53592b3640019f2834701093e38272fdfd367ad8 < 60ddea1600bc476e0f5e02bce0e29a460ccbf0be, 53592b3640019f2834701093e38272fdfd367ad8 < 52f671db18823089a02f07efc04efdb2272ddc17, 4.10
Fixed
Linux: < 4.10, 6.6.19 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.7 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 Apr 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:03 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-24002
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26740 · cve.blacktree.nl