BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26676High confidence

af_unix: Call kfree_skb() for dead unix_(sk)->oob_skb in GC.

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.23% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.82-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-23938

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Call kfree_skb() for dead unix_(sk)->oob_skb in GC. syzbot reported a warning [0] in __unix_gc() with a repro, which creates a socketpair and sends one socket's fd to itself using the peer. socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, [3, 4]) = 0 sendmsg(4, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\360", iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_control=[{cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, cmsg_data=[3]}], msg_controllen=24, msg_flags=0}, MSG_OOB|MSG_PROBE|MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_ZEROCOPY) = 1 This forms a self-cyclic reference that GC should finally untangle but does not due to lack of MSG_OOB handling, resulting in memory leak. Recently, commit 11498715f266 ("af_unix: Remove io_uring code for GC.") removed io_uring's dead code in GC and revealed the problem. The code was executed at the final stage of GC and unconditionally moved all GC candidates from gc_candidates to gc_inflight_list. That papered over the reported problem by always making the following WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&gc_candidates)) false. The problem has been there since commit 2aab4b969002 ("af_unix: fix struct pid leaks in OOB support") added full scm support for MSG_OOB while fixing another bug. To fix this problem, we must call kfree_skb() for unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb if the socket still exists in gc_candidates after purging collected skb. Then, we need to set NULL to oob_skb before calling kfree_skb() because it calls last fput() and triggers unix_release_sock(), where we call duplicate kfree_skb(u->oob_skb) if not NULL. Note that the leaked socket remained being linked to a global list, so kmemleak also could not detect it. We need to check /proc/net/protocol to notice the unfreed socket. [0]: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2863 at net/unix/garbage.c:345 __unix_gc+0xc74/0xe80 net/unix/garbage.c:345 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 2863 Comm: kworker/u4:11 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00583-g1701940b1a02 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc RIP: 0010:__unix_gc+0xc74/0xe80 net/unix/garbage.c:345 Code: 8b 5c 24 50 e9 86 f8 ff ff e8 f8 e4 22 f8 31 d2 48 c7 c6 30 6a 69 89 4c 89 ef e8 97 ef ff ff e9 80 f9 ff ff e8 dd e4 22 f8 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 7b fd ff ff 48 89 df e8 5c e7 7c f8 e9 d3 f8 ff ff e8 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000b03fba0 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9000b03fc10 RCX: ffffffff816c493e RDX: ffff88802c02d940 RSI: ffffffff896982f3 RDI: ffffc9000b03fb30 RBP: ffffc9000b03fce0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff52001607f66 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffffc9000b03fc10 R14: ffffc9000b03fc10 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005559c8677a60 CR3: 000000000d57a000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> process_one_work+0x889/0x15e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2633 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2706 [inline] worker_thread+0x8b9/0x12a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x2c6/0x3b0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Call kfree_skb() for dead unix_(sk)->oob_skb in GC. syzbot reported a warning [0] in __unix_gc() with a repro, which creates a socketpair and sends one socket's fd to itself using the peer. socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, [3, 4]) = 0 sendmsg(4, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\360", iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_control=[{cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, cmsg_data=[3]}], msg_controllen=24, msg_flags=0}, MSG_OOB|MSG_PROBE|MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_ZEROCOPY) = 1 This forms a self-cyclic reference that GC should finally untangle but does not due to lack of MSG_OOB handling, resulting in memory leak. Recently, commit 11498715f266 ("af_unix: Remove io_uring code for GC.") removed io_uring's dead code in GC and revealed the problem. The code was executed at the final stage of GC and unconditionally moved all GC candidates from gc_candidates to gc_inflight_list. That papered over the reported problem by always making the following WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&gc_candidates)) false. The problem has been there since commit 2aab4b969002 ("af_unix: fix struct pid leaks in OOB support") added full scm support for MSG_OOB while fixing another bug. To fix this problem, we must call kfree_skb() for unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb if the socket still exists in gc_candidates after purging collected skb. Then, we need to set NULL to oob_skb before calling kfree_skb() because it calls last fput() and triggers unix_release_sock(), where we call duplicate kfree_skb(u->oob_skb) if not NULL. Note that the leaked socket remained being linked to a global list, so kmemleak also could not detect it. We need to check /proc/net/protocol to notice the unfreed socket. [0]: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2863 at net/unix/garbage.c:345 __unix_gc+0xc74/0xe80 net/unix/garbage.c:345 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 2863 Comm: kworker/u4:11 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00583-g1701940b1a02 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc RIP: 0010:__unix_gc+0xc74/0xe80 net/unix/garbage.c:345 Code: 8b 5c 24 50 e9 86 f8 ff ff e8 f8 e4 22 f8 31 d2 48 c7 c6 30 6a 69 89 4c 89 ef e8 97 ef ff ff e9 80 f9 ff ff e8 dd e4 22 f8 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 7b fd ff ff 48 89 df e8 5c e7 7c f8 e9 d3 f8 ff ff e8 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000b03fba0 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9000b03fc10 RCX: ffffffff816c493e RDX: ffff88802c02d940 RSI: ffffffff896982f3 RDI: ffffc9000b03fb30 RBP: ffffc9000b03fce0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff52001607f66 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffffc9000b03fc10 R14: ffffc9000b03fc10 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005559c8677a60 CR3: 000000000d57a000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> process_one_work+0x889/0x15e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2633 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2706 [inline] worker_thread+0x8b9/0x12a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x2c6/0x3b0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Call kfree_skb() for dead unix_(sk)->oob_skb in GC. syzbot reported a warning [0] in __unix_gc() with a repro, which creates a socketpair and sends one socket's fd to itself using the peer. socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, [3, 4]) = 0 sendmsg(4, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\360", iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_control=[{cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, cmsg_data=[3]}], msg_controllen=24, msg_flags=0}, MSG_OOB|MSG_PROBE|MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_ZEROCOPY) = 1 This forms a self-cyclic reference that GC should finally untangle but does not due to lack of MSG_OOB handling, resulting in memory leak. Recently, commit 11498715f266 ("af_unix: Remove io_uring code for GC.") removed io_uring's dead code in GC and revealed the problem. The code was executed at the final stage of GC and unconditionally moved all GC candidates from gc_candidates to gc_inflight_list. That papered over the reported problem by always making the following WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&gc_candidates)) false. The problem has been there since commit 2aab4b969002 ("af_unix: fix struct pid leaks in OOB support") added full scm support for MSG_OOB while fixing another bug. To fix this problem, we must call kfree_skb() for unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb if the socket still exists in gc_candidates after purging collected skb. Then, we need to set NULL to oob_skb before calling kfree_skb() because it calls last fput() and triggers unix_release_sock(), where we call duplicate kfree_skb(u->oob_skb) if not NULL. Note that the leaked socket remained being linked to a global list, so kmemleak also could not detect it. We need to check /proc/net/protocol to notice the unfreed socket. [0]: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2863 at net/unix/garbage.c:345 __unix_gc+0xc74/0xe80 net/unix/garbage.c:345 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 2863 Comm: kworker/u4:11 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00583-g1701940b1a02 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc RIP: 0010:__unix_gc+0xc74/0xe80 net/unix/garbage.c:345 Code: 8b 5c 24 50 e9 86 f8 ff ff e8 f8 e4 22 f8 31 d2 48 c7 c6 30 6a 69 89 4c 89 ef e8 97 ef ff ff e9 80 f9 ff ff e8 dd e4 22 f8 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 7b fd ff ff 48 89 df e8 5c e7 7c f8 e9 d3 f8 ff ff e8 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000b03fba0 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9000b03fc10 RCX: ffffffff816c493e RDX: ffff88802c02d940 RSI: ffffffff896982f3 RDI: ffffc9000b03fb30 RBP: ffffc9000b03fce0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff52001607f66 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffffc9000b03fc10 R14: ffffc9000b03fc10 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005559c8677a60 CR3: 000000000d57a000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> process_one_work+0x889/0x15e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2633 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2706 [inline] worker_thread+0x8b9/0x12a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x2c6/0x3b0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 </TASK>

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0749Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240403Security Bulletin 03 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 03 Apr 2024, published on 3 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26657 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26666 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26667 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26688 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-0090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-0091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0091 Référence CVE CVE-2024-0092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26482 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0633Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26666 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26667 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26687 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0611Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26666 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26667 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26687 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0456Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0439Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0422Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0383Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26670 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26695 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0334Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-26659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26667 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26687 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-022985Linux の Linux Kernel における有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: f3969427fb06a2c3cd6efd7faab63505cfa76e76 < 4fe505c63aa3273135a57597fda761e9aecc7668, ac1968ac399205fda9ee3b18f7de7416cb3a5d0d < e0e09186d8821ad59806115d347ea32efa43ca4b, 2aab4b96900272885bc157f8b236abf1cdc02e08 < b74aa9ce13d02b7fd37c5325b99854f91b9b4276, 2aab4b96900272885bc157f8b236abf1cdc02e08 < 82ae47c5c3a6b27fdc0f9e83c1499cb439c56140, 2aab4b96900272885bc157f8b236abf1cdc02e08 < 1279f9d9dec2d7462823a18c29ad61359e0a007d, a59d6306263c38e5c0592ea4451ca26a0778c947, 5.15.103 < 5.15.149, 6.1.20 < 6.1.78, 6.2.7 < 6.3, 6.3
Fixed
Linux: < 6.3, 5.15.149 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.78 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.17 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.5 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Apr 2024 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:36 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-23938
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD enrichment underway

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26676 · cve.blacktree.nl