BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26669High confidence

net/sched: flower: Fix chain template offload

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-23931

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: flower: Fix chain template offload When a qdisc is deleted from a net device the stack instructs the underlying driver to remove its flow offload callback from the associated filter block using the 'FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND' command. The stack then continues to replay the removal of the filters in the block for this driver by iterating over the chains in the block and invoking the 'reoffload' operation of the classifier being used. In turn, the classifier in its 'reoffload' operation prepares and emits a 'FLOW_CLS_DESTROY' command for each filter. However, the stack does not do the same for chain templates and the underlying driver never receives a 'FLOW_CLS_TMPLT_DESTROY' command when a qdisc is deleted. This results in a memory leak [1] which can be reproduced using [2]. Fix by introducing a 'tmplt_reoffload' operation and have the stack invoke it with the appropriate arguments as part of the replay. Implement the operation in the sole classifier that supports chain templates (flower) by emitting the 'FLOW_CLS_TMPLT_{CREATE,DESTROY}' command based on whether a flow offload callback is being bound to a filter block or being unbound from one. As far as I can tell, the issue happens since cited commit which reordered tcf_block_offload_unbind() before tcf_block_flush_all_chains() in __tcf_block_put(). The order cannot be reversed as the filter block is expected to be freed after flushing all the chains. [1] unreferenced object 0xffff888107e28800 (size 2048): comm "tc", pid 1079, jiffies 4294958525 (age 3074.287s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): b1 a6 7c 11 81 88 ff ff e0 5b b3 10 81 88 ff ff ..|......[...... 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 aa b0 84 ff ff ff ff ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff81c06a68>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e8/0x320 [<ffffffff81ab374e>] __kmalloc+0x4e/0x90 [<ffffffff832aec6d>] mlxsw_sp_acl_ruleset_get+0x34d/0x7a0 [<ffffffff832bc195>] mlxsw_sp_flower_tmplt_create+0x145/0x180 [<ffffffff832b2e1a>] mlxsw_sp_flow_block_cb+0x1ea/0x280 [<ffffffff83a10613>] tc_setup_cb_call+0x183/0x340 [<ffffffff83a9f85a>] fl_tmplt_create+0x3da/0x4c0 [<ffffffff83a22435>] tc_ctl_chain+0xa15/0x1170 [<ffffffff838a863c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xed0 [<ffffffff83ac87f0>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x170/0x440 [<ffffffff83ac6270>] netlink_unicast+0x540/0x820 [<ffffffff83ac6e28>] netlink_sendmsg+0x8d8/0xda0 [<ffffffff83793def>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x30f/0xa80 [<ffffffff8379d29a>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x13a/0x1e0 [<ffffffff8379d50c>] __sys_sendmsg+0x11c/0x1f0 [<ffffffff843b9ce0>] do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 unreferenced object 0xffff88816d2c0400 (size 1024): comm "tc", pid 1079, jiffies 4294958525 (age 3074.287s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 57 f6 38 be 00 00 00 00 @.......W.8..... 10 04 2c 6d 81 88 ff ff 10 04 2c 6d 81 88 ff ff ..,m......,m.... backtrace: [<ffffffff81c06a68>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e8/0x320 [<ffffffff81ab36c1>] __kmalloc_node+0x51/0x90 [<ffffffff81a8ed96>] kvmalloc_node+0xa6/0x1f0 [<ffffffff82827d03>] bucket_table_alloc.isra.0+0x83/0x460 [<ffffffff82828d2b>] rhashtable_init+0x43b/0x7c0 [<ffffffff832aed48>] mlxsw_sp_acl_ruleset_get+0x428/0x7a0 [<ffffffff832bc195>] mlxsw_sp_flower_tmplt_create+0x145/0x180 [<ffffffff832b2e1a>] mlxsw_sp_flow_block_cb+0x1ea/0x280 [<ffffffff83a10613>] tc_setup_cb_call+0x183/0x340 [<ffffffff83a9f85a>] fl_tmplt_create+0x3da/0x4c0 [<ffffffff83a22435>] tc_ctl_chain+0xa15/0x1170 [<ffffffff838a863c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xed0 [<ffffffff83ac87f0>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x170/0x440 [<ffffffff83ac6270>] netlink_unicast+0x540/0x820 [<ffffffff83ac6e28>] netlink_sendmsg+0x8d8/0xda0 [<ffffffff83793def>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x30f/0xa80 [2] # tc qdisc add dev swp1 clsact # tc chain add dev swp1 ingress proto ip chain 1 flower dst_ip 0.0.0.0/32 # tc qdisc del dev ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: flower: Fix chain template offload When a qdisc is deleted from a net device the stack instructs the underlying driver to remove its flow offload callback from the associated filter block using the 'FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND' command. The stack then continues to replay the removal of the filters in the block for this driver by iterating over the chains in the block and invoking the 'reoffload' operation of the classifier being used. In turn, the classifier in its 'reoffload' operation prepares and emits a 'FLOW_CLS_DESTROY' command for each filter. However, the stack does not do the same for chain templates and the underlying driver never receives a 'FLOW_CLS_TMPLT_DESTROY' command when a qdisc is deleted. This results in a memory leak [1] which can be reproduced using [2]. Fix by introducing a 'tmplt_reoffload' operation and have the stack invoke it with the appropriate arguments as part of the replay. Implement the operation in the sole classifier that supports chain templates (flower) by emitting the 'FLOW_CLS_TMPLT_{CREATE,DESTROY}' command based on whether a flow offload callback is being bound to a filter block or being unbound from one. As far as I can tell, the issue happens since cited commit which reordered tcf_block_offload_unbind() before tcf_block_flush_all_chains() in __tcf_block_put(). The order cannot be reversed as the filter block is expected to be freed after flushing all the chains. [1] unreferenced object 0xffff888107e28800 (size 2048): comm "tc", pid 1079, jiffies 4294958525 (age 3074.287s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): b1 a6 7c 11 81 88 ff ff e0 5b b3 10 81 88 ff ff ..|......[...... 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 aa b0 84 ff ff ff ff ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff81c06a68>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e8/0x320 [<ffffffff81ab374e>] __kmalloc+0x4e/0x90 [<ffffffff832aec6d>] mlxsw_sp_acl_ruleset_get+0x34d/0x7a0 [<ffffffff832bc195>] mlxsw_sp_flower_tmplt_create+0x145/0x180 [<ffffffff832b2e1a>] mlxsw_sp_flow_block_cb+0x1ea/0x280 [<ffffffff83a10613>] tc_setup_cb_call+0x183/0x340 [<ffffffff83a9f85a>] fl_tmplt_create+0x3da/0x4c0 [<ffffffff83a22435>] tc_ctl_chain+0xa15/0x1170 [<ffffffff838a863c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xed0 [<ffffffff83ac87f0>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x170/0x440 [<ffffffff83ac6270>] netlink_unicast+0x540/0x820 [<ffffffff83ac6e28>] netlink_sendmsg+0x8d8/0xda0 [<ffffffff83793def>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x30f/0xa80 [<ffffffff8379d29a>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x13a/0x1e0 [<ffffffff8379d50c>] __sys_sendmsg+0x11c/0x1f0 [<ffffffff843b9ce0>] do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 unreferenced object 0xffff88816d2c0400 (size 1024): comm "tc", pid 1079, jiffies 4294958525 (age 3074.287s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 57 f6 38 be 00 00 00 00 @.......W.8..... 10 04 2c 6d 81 88 ff ff 10 04 2c 6d 81 88 ff ff ..,m......,m.... backtrace: [<ffffffff81c06a68>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e8/0x320 [<ffffffff81ab36c1>] __kmalloc_node+0x51/0x90 [<ffffffff81a8ed96>] kvmalloc_node+0xa6/0x1f0 [<ffffffff82827d03>] bucket_table_alloc.isra.0+0x83/0x460 [<ffffffff82828d2b>] rhashtable_init+0x43b/0x7c0 [<ffffffff832aed48>] mlxsw_sp_acl_ruleset_get+0x428/0x7a0 [<ffffffff832bc195>] mlxsw_sp_flower_tmplt_create+0x145/0x180 [<ffffffff832b2e1a>] mlxsw_sp_flow_block_cb+0x1ea/0x280 [<ffffffff83a10613>] tc_setup_cb_call+0x183/0x340 [<ffffffff83a9f85a>] fl_tmplt_create+0x3da/0x4c0 [<ffffffff83a22435>] tc_ctl_chain+0xa15/0x1170 [<ffffffff838a863c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xed0 [<ffffffff83ac87f0>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x170/0x440 [<ffffffff83ac6270>] netlink_unicast+0x540/0x820 [<ffffffff83ac6e28>] netlink_sendmsg+0x8d8/0xda0 [<ffffffff83793def>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x30f/0xa80 [2] # tc qdisc add dev swp1 clsact # tc chain add dev swp1 ingress proto ip chain 1 flower dst_ip 0.0.0.0/32 # tc qdisc del dev ---truncated---

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: flower: Fix chain template offload When a qdisc is deleted from a net device the stack instructs the underlying driver to remove its flow offload callback from the associated filter block using the 'FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND' command. The stack then continues to replay the removal of the filters in the block for this driver by iterating over the chains in the block and invoking the 'reoffload' operation of the classifier being used. In turn, the classifier in its 'reoffload' operation prepares and emits a 'FLOW_CLS_DESTROY' command for each filter. However, the stack does not do the same for chain templates and the underlying driver never receives a 'FLOW_CLS_TMPLT_DESTROY' command when a qdisc is deleted. This results in a memory leak [1] which can be reproduced using [2]. Fix by introducing a 'tmplt_reoffload' operation and have the stack invoke it with the appropriate arguments as part of the replay. Implement the operation in the sole classifier that supports chain templates (flower) by emitting the 'FLOW_CLS_TMPLT_{CREATE,DESTROY}' command based on whether a flow offload callback is being bound to a filter block or being unbound from one. As far as I can tell, the issue happens since cited commit which reordered tcf_block_offload_unbind() before tcf_block_flush_all_chains() in __tcf_block_put(). The order cannot be reversed as the filter block is expected to be freed after flushing all the chains. [1] unreferenced object 0xffff888107e28800 (size 2048): comm "tc", pid 1079, jiffies 4294958525 (age 3074.287s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): b1 a6 7c 11 81 88 ff ff e0 5b b3 10 81 88 ff ff ..|......[...... 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 aa b0 84 ff ff ff ff ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff81c06a68>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e8/0x320 [<ffffffff81ab374e>] __kmalloc+0x4e/0x90 [<ffffffff832aec6d>] mlxsw_sp_acl_ruleset_get+0x34d/0x7a0 [<ffffffff832bc195>] mlxsw_sp_flower_tmplt_create+0x145/0x180 [<ffffffff832b2e1a>] mlxsw_sp_flow_block_cb+0x1ea/0x280 [<ffffffff83a10613>] tc_setup_cb_call+0x183/0x340 [<ffffffff83a9f85a>] fl_tmplt_create+0x3da/0x4c0 [<ffffffff83a22435>] tc_ctl_chain+0xa15/0x1170 [<ffffffff838a863c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xed0 [<ffffffff83ac87f0>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x170/0x440 [<ffffffff83ac6270>] netlink_unicast+0x540/0x820 [<ffffffff83ac6e28>] netlink_sendmsg+0x8d8/0xda0 [<ffffffff83793def>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x30f/0xa80 [<ffffffff8379d29a>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x13a/0x1e0 [<ffffffff8379d50c>] __sys_sendmsg+0x11c/0x1f0 [<ffffffff843b9ce0>] do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 unreferenced object 0xffff88816d2c0400 (size 1024): comm "tc", pid 1079, jiffies 4294958525 (age 3074.287s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 57 f6 38 be 00 00 00 00 @.......W.8..... 10 04 2c 6d 81 88 ff ff 10 04 2c 6d 81 88 ff ff ..,m......,m.... backtrace: [<ffffffff81c06a68>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e8/0x320 [<ffffffff81ab36c1>] __kmalloc_node+0x51/0x90 [<ffffffff81a8ed96>] kvmalloc_node+0xa6/0x1f0 [<ffffffff82827d03>] bucket_table_alloc.isra.0+0x83/0x460 [<ffffffff82828d2b>] rhashtable_init+0x43b/0x7c0 [<ffffffff832aed48>] mlxsw_sp_acl_ruleset_get+0x428/0x7a0 [<ffffffff832bc195>] mlxsw_sp_flower_tmplt_create+0x145/0x180 [<ffffffff832b2e1a>] mlxsw_sp_flow_block_cb+0x1ea/0x280 [<ffffffff83a10613>] tc_setup_cb_call+0x183/0x340 [<ffffffff83a9f85a>] fl_tmplt_create+0x3da/0x4c0 [<ffffffff83a22435>] tc_ctl_chain+0xa15/0x1170 [<ffffffff838a863c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xed0 [<ffffffff83ac87f0>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x170/0x440 [<ffffffff83ac6270>] netlink_unicast+0x540/0x820 [<ffffffff83ac6e28>] netlink_sendmsg+0x8d8/0xda0 [<ffffffff83793def>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x30f/0xa80 [2] # tc qdisc add dev swp1 clsact # tc chain add dev swp1 ingress proto ip chain 1 flower dst_ip 0.0.0.0/32 # tc qdisc del dev ---truncated---

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1293IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Informationen auszuspähen, einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen oder weitere unspezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1913Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0749Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240403Security Bulletin 03 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 03 Apr 2024, published on 3 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-26600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26717 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0561Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

ord?id=CVE-2022-49328 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49377 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49377 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49395 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49407 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1652 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

ord?id=CVE-2023-52889 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52904 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52918 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1080Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2023-52889 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1013Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-25741 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0997Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2023-52889 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-26461 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26586 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26667 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26700 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26703 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0957Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2023-52614 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52918 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26891 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0840Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52909 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52910 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52911 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52912 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0822Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2023-6546 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26590 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26682 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26683 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52909 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52910 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52911 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52912 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26590 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26682 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26683 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

ord?id=CVE-2023-52885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26586 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0383Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26646 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26670 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-020790Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: bbf73830cd48cff1599811d4f69c7cfd49c7b869 < 9ed46144cff3598a5cf79955630e795ff9af5b97, bbf73830cd48cff1599811d4f69c7cfd49c7b869 < c04709b2cc99ae31c346f79f0211752d7b74df01, bbf73830cd48cff1599811d4f69c7cfd49c7b869 < 32f2a0afa95fae0d1ceec2ff06e0e816939964b8, 5.1
Fixed
Linux: < 5.1, 6.6.15 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.3 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Apr 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:01 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-23931
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26669 · cve.blacktree.nl