BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26620High confidence

s390/vfio-ap: always filter entire AP matrix

Linux · Linux

8.2HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.63% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.76-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-26620 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: s390/vfio-ap: always filter entire AP matrix
198 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
This linux kernel vulnerability occurs in the s390/vfio-ap cryptographic device driver for the IBM S/390 platform. The issue arises within the vfio_ap_mdev_filter_matrix function, which is called whenever a new adapter or domain is assigned to a mediated device (mdev). Because the code failed to consistently filter the entire AP matrix under certain conditions, it creates an out-of-bounds write flaw. This memory corruption bug could potentially be exploited to compromise the system's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Patched kernel versions resolve the issue by ensuring the driver properly filters the entire AP matrix during these assignment operations, preventing the unsafe out-of-bounds memory access.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-23882

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/vfio-ap: always filter entire AP matrix The vfio_ap_mdev_filter_matrix function is called whenever a new adapter or domain is assigned to the mdev. The purpose of the function is to update the guest's AP configuration by filtering the matrix of adapters and domains assigned to the mdev. When an adapter or domain is assigned, only the APQNs associated with the APID of the new adapter or APQI of the new domain are inspected. If an APQN does not reference a queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver, then it's APID will be filtered from the mdev's matrix when updating the guest's AP configuration. Inspecting only the APID of the new adapter or APQI of the new domain will result in passing AP queues through to a guest that are not bound to the vfio_ap device driver under certain circumstances. Consider the following: guest's AP configuration (all also assigned to the mdev's matrix): 14.0004 14.0005 14.0006 16.0004 16.0005 16.0006 unassign domain 4 unbind queue 16.0005 assign domain 4 When domain 4 is re-assigned, since only domain 4 will be inspected, the APQNs that will be examined will be: 14.0004 16.0004 Since both of those APQNs reference queue devices that are bound to the vfio_ap device driver, nothing will get filtered from the mdev's matrix when updating the guest's AP configuration. Consequently, queue 16.0005 will get passed through despite not being bound to the driver. This violates the linux device model requirement that a guest shall only be given access to devices bound to the device driver facilitating their pass-through. To resolve this problem, every adapter and domain assigned to the mdev will be inspected when filtering the mdev's matrix.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/vfio-ap: always filter entire AP matrix The vfio_ap_mdev_filter_matrix function is called whenever a new adapter or domain is assigned to the mdev. The purpose of the function is to update the guest's AP configuration by filtering the matrix of adapters and domains assigned to the mdev. When an adapter or domain is assigned, only the APQNs associated with the APID of the new adapter or APQI of the new domain are inspected. If an APQN does not reference a queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver, then it's APID will be filtered from the mdev's matrix when updating the guest's AP configuration. Inspecting only the APID of the new adapter or APQI of the new domain will result in passing AP queues through to a guest that are not bound to the vfio_ap device driver under certain circumstances. Consider the following: guest's AP configuration (all also assigned to the mdev's matrix): 14.0004 14.0005 14.0006 16.0004 16.0005 16.0006 unassign domain 4 unbind queue 16.0005 assign domain 4 When domain 4 is re-assigned, since only domain 4 will be inspected, the APQNs that will be examined will be: 14.0004 16.0004 Since both of those APQNs reference queue devices that are bound to the vfio_ap device driver, nothing will get filtered from the mdev's matrix when updating the guest's AP configuration. Consequently, queue 16.0005 will get passed through despite not being bound to the driver. This violates the linux device model requirement that a guest shall only be given access to devices bound to the device driver facilitating their pass-through. To resolve this problem, every adapter and domain assigned to the mdev will be inspected when filtering the mdev's matrix.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/vfio-ap: always filter entire AP matrix The vfio_ap_mdev_filter_matrix function is called whenever a new adapter or domain is assigned to the mdev. The purpose of the function is to update the guest's AP configuration by filtering the matrix of adapters and domains assigned to the mdev. When an adapter or domain is assigned, only the APQNs associated with the APID of the new adapter or APQI of the new domain are inspected. If an APQN does not reference a queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver, then it's APID will be filtered from the mdev's matrix when updating the guest's AP configuration. Inspecting only the APID of the new adapter or APQI of the new domain will result in passing AP queues through to a guest that are not bound to the vfio_ap device driver under certain circumstances. Consider the following: guest's AP configuration (all also assigned to the mdev's matrix): 14.0004 14.0005 14.0006 16.0004 16.0005 16.0006 unassign domain 4 unbind queue 16.0005 assign domain 4 When domain 4 is re-assigned, since only domain 4 will be inspected, the APQNs that will be examined will be: 14.0004 16.0004 Since both of those APQNs reference queue devices that are bound to the vfio_ap device driver, nothing will get filtered from the mdev's matrix when updating the guest's AP configuration. Consequently, queue 16.0005 will get passed through despite not being bound to the driver. This violates the linux device model requirement that a guest shall only be given access to devices bound to the device driver facilitating their pass-through. To resolve this problem, every adapter and domain assigned to the mdev will be inspected when filtering the mdev's matrix.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
High: elevated access is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRHighPrivileges required: The attacker needs elevated or administrative privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0527Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand zu verursachen und einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240313Security Bulletin 13 Mar 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 Mar 2024, published on 13 March 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0383Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26608 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26612 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26616 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26618 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26620 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26623 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0363Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-25739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25743 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26612 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26620 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26646 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-23307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26612 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26620 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26646 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-019045Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 48cae940c31d2407d860d87c41d5f9871c0521db < d6b8d034b576f406af920a7bee81606c027b24c6, 48cae940c31d2407d860d87c41d5f9871c0521db < c69d821197611678533fb3eb784fc823b921349a, 48cae940c31d2407d860d87c41d5f9871c0521db < cdd134d56138302976685e6c7bc4755450b3880e, 48cae940c31d2407d860d87c41d5f9871c0521db < 850fb7fa8c684a4c6bf0e4b6978f4ddcc5d43d11, 6.0
Fixed
Linux: < 6.0, 6.1.76 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.15 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.3 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Feb 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-23882
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26620 · cve.blacktree.nl